Real world delays in antivenom administration: patient, snake or hospital factors (ASP-33).

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2433125
Geoffrey K Isbister, Angela L Chiew, Nicholas A Buckley, Jessamine Soderstrom, Simon Ga Brown, Shane Jenkins, Katherine Z Isoardi
{"title":"Real world delays in antivenom administration: patient, snake or hospital factors (ASP-33).","authors":"Geoffrey K Isbister, Angela L Chiew, Nicholas A Buckley, Jessamine Soderstrom, Simon Ga Brown, Shane Jenkins, Katherine Z Isoardi","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2433125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Early antivenom administration is essential for effective treatment. We investigated the delays in antivenom administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed snakebites from the Australian Snakebite Project (2006-2021) given antivenom, presenting to hospital within 12 h. We extracted demographics, snake type, time of bite, hospital arrival, blood collection, antivenom treatment and hospital transfer.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,169 patients recruited to Australian Snakebite Project 1,132 patients received antivenom within 12 h of the bite, and 1,019 of these were envenomated: median age 41 years (IQR: 24-57 years); 738 (72%) males. A pressure bandage was applied in 950 (93%), a median of 15 min (IQR: 5-30 min) post-bite. Specific snakes were identified by venom assays in 855 patients (80%), including 328 brown snakes (32%), 173 tiger snakes (17%), 74 rough-scaled snakes (7%), 85 red-bellied black snakes (8%), 49 taipans (5%) and 26 death adders (3%). Seventy-seven patients (7%) received antivenom without envenomation. The median length of hospital stay was 41 h (IQR: 24-67 h). The median time to hospital was 60 min (IQR: 30-105 min), to first blood tests was 90 min (IQR: 59-154 min) and to antivenom was 235 min (IQR: 155-345 min). There was a median delay in blood tests of 20 min (IQR: 10-37 min) and a median delay to antivenom of 147 min (IQR: 84-249 min). Non-specific systemic symptoms occurred in 641 (63%) patients, which occurred a median of 24 min (IQR: 10-60 min) post-bite, which was at a median of 180 min (IQR: 106 to 275 min) prior to antivenom administration. Time to antivenom in the 314 transferred patients was similar to those not transferred. Time to antivenom was significantly shorter for 189 patients given antivenom prior to transfer, median 183 min (IQR: 110-270 min), compared to 130 patients given antivenom after transfer, median 363 min (IQR: 289-513 min; <i>P</i> <0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Antivenom administration was delayed on average by 2.5 h after hospital presentation, despite three-quarters arriving in hospital within 3 h, the optimal time for antivenom administration. Patients requiring transfer received antivenom in a similar time, but earlier if administered prior to transfer, highlighting the possible benefits of pragmatic clinical decision-making prior to blood tests.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found the leading cause of delays to antivenom administration after patients arrive in hospital was waiting for blood results. Systemic symptoms occurred early in most cases and could be given greater weight in decisions about early antivenom.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"10-15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2433125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Early antivenom administration is essential for effective treatment. We investigated the delays in antivenom administration.

Methods: We reviewed snakebites from the Australian Snakebite Project (2006-2021) given antivenom, presenting to hospital within 12 h. We extracted demographics, snake type, time of bite, hospital arrival, blood collection, antivenom treatment and hospital transfer.

Results: There were 2,169 patients recruited to Australian Snakebite Project 1,132 patients received antivenom within 12 h of the bite, and 1,019 of these were envenomated: median age 41 years (IQR: 24-57 years); 738 (72%) males. A pressure bandage was applied in 950 (93%), a median of 15 min (IQR: 5-30 min) post-bite. Specific snakes were identified by venom assays in 855 patients (80%), including 328 brown snakes (32%), 173 tiger snakes (17%), 74 rough-scaled snakes (7%), 85 red-bellied black snakes (8%), 49 taipans (5%) and 26 death adders (3%). Seventy-seven patients (7%) received antivenom without envenomation. The median length of hospital stay was 41 h (IQR: 24-67 h). The median time to hospital was 60 min (IQR: 30-105 min), to first blood tests was 90 min (IQR: 59-154 min) and to antivenom was 235 min (IQR: 155-345 min). There was a median delay in blood tests of 20 min (IQR: 10-37 min) and a median delay to antivenom of 147 min (IQR: 84-249 min). Non-specific systemic symptoms occurred in 641 (63%) patients, which occurred a median of 24 min (IQR: 10-60 min) post-bite, which was at a median of 180 min (IQR: 106 to 275 min) prior to antivenom administration. Time to antivenom in the 314 transferred patients was similar to those not transferred. Time to antivenom was significantly shorter for 189 patients given antivenom prior to transfer, median 183 min (IQR: 110-270 min), compared to 130 patients given antivenom after transfer, median 363 min (IQR: 289-513 min; P <0.001).

Discussion: Antivenom administration was delayed on average by 2.5 h after hospital presentation, despite three-quarters arriving in hospital within 3 h, the optimal time for antivenom administration. Patients requiring transfer received antivenom in a similar time, but earlier if administered prior to transfer, highlighting the possible benefits of pragmatic clinical decision-making prior to blood tests.

Conclusion: We found the leading cause of delays to antivenom administration after patients arrive in hospital was waiting for blood results. Systemic symptoms occurred early in most cases and could be given greater weight in decisions about early antivenom.

现实世界中抗蛇毒血清治疗的延迟:患者、蛇或医院因素(ASP-33)。
目的:早期给予抗蛇毒血清是有效治疗的必要条件。我们调查了抗蛇毒血清治疗的延迟。方法:我们回顾了澳大利亚蛇咬伤项目(2006-2021)中使用抗蛇毒血清的蛇咬伤,并在12小时内就诊。我们提取了人口统计数据、蛇的种类、咬伤时间、到达医院、采血、抗蛇毒血清治疗和医院转院。结果:澳大利亚蛇咬伤项目招募了2169名患者,其中1132名患者在咬伤后12小时内接受了抗蛇毒血清治疗,其中1019名患者中位年龄41岁(IQR: 24-57岁);男性738人(72%)。950例(93%)患者在咬伤后中位15分钟(IQR: 5-30分钟)使用压力绷带。其中,褐蛇328条(32%)、虎蛇173条(17%)、粗鳞蛇74条(7%)、红腹黑蛇85条(8%)、大班蛇49条(5%)、死亡加德蛇26条(3%)。77例(7%)患者接受抗蛇毒血清无毒化治疗。中位住院时间为41小时(IQR: 24-67小时)。到医院的中位时间为60分钟(IQR: 30-105分钟),到首次血液检查的中位时间为90分钟(IQR: 59-154分钟),到抗蛇毒血清的中位时间为235分钟(IQR: 155-345分钟)。血液检测中位延迟20分钟(IQR: 10-37分钟),抗蛇毒血清检测中位延迟147分钟(IQR: 84-249分钟)。641例(63%)患者出现非特异性全身症状,咬伤后中位时间为24分钟(IQR: 10-60分钟),而抗蛇毒血清治疗前中位时间为180分钟(IQR: 106 - 275分钟)。314名转院患者的抗蛇毒血清时间与未转院患者相似。转移前给予抗蛇毒血清的189例患者到抗蛇毒血清的时间显著缩短,中位183分钟(IQR: 110-270分钟),而转移后给予抗蛇毒血清的130例患者,中位363分钟(IQR: 289-513分钟);P讨论:抗蛇毒血清给药平均延迟2.5小时,尽管四分之三的患者在3小时内到达医院,这是抗蛇毒血清给药的最佳时间。需要转移的患者在类似的时间内接受了抗蛇毒血清治疗,但如果在转移前给药,则更早,这突出了在血液检测前进行务实的临床决策可能带来的好处。结论:我们发现患者到达医院后抗蛇毒血清给药延误的主要原因是等待血液结果。在大多数情况下,全身性症状出现得较早,因此在决定是否早期抗蛇毒血清时可能会有更大的权重。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信