From proof and unproof to critical fabulation: a response to Frieman

IF 1.9 2区 历史学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Antiquity Pub Date : 2024-12-10 DOI:10.15184/aqy.2024.150
Rachel J. Crellin
{"title":"From proof and unproof to critical fabulation: a response to Frieman","authors":"Rachel J. Crellin","doi":"10.15184/aqy.2024.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In her debate article, Frieman's (2024) reflections on the idea of unproof are a welcome and elegant addition to current debate on the nature of archaeological evidence, how we construct the stories we tell about the past, and the role of archaeology in the contemporary world. Frieman draws on both feminist and anarchist theory to argue that the value of archaeology is the way it allows us to grasp worlds different from our own and suggests that this can allow us to pre-figure better future worlds. This chimes closely with other recent work on the subject (e.g. Barton 2021; Cipolla <span>et al</span>. 2024; Schofield 2024)—clearly, archaeologists are considering the radical potential of our own discipline to change the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":8058,"journal":{"name":"Antiquity","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In her debate article, Frieman's (2024) reflections on the idea of unproof are a welcome and elegant addition to current debate on the nature of archaeological evidence, how we construct the stories we tell about the past, and the role of archaeology in the contemporary world. Frieman draws on both feminist and anarchist theory to argue that the value of archaeology is the way it allows us to grasp worlds different from our own and suggests that this can allow us to pre-figure better future worlds. This chimes closely with other recent work on the subject (e.g. Barton 2021; Cipolla et al. 2024; Schofield 2024)—clearly, archaeologists are considering the radical potential of our own discipline to change the world.

从证明和不证明到批判性的虚构:对弗里德曼的回应
在她的辩论文章中,弗里德曼(2024)对“无证据”概念的反思是当前关于考古证据本质、我们如何构建关于过去的故事以及考古学在当代世界中的作用的辩论的一个受欢迎和优雅的补充。弗里德曼借鉴了女权主义和无政府主义理论,认为考古学的价值在于它使我们能够把握与我们自己的世界不同的世界,并暗示这可以让我们预见更美好的未来世界。这与近期其他关于这一主题的作品(如《Barton 2021》;Cipolla et al. 2024;斯科菲尔德2024)——很明显,考古学家正在考虑我们自己的学科改变世界的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antiquity
Antiquity Multiple-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
149
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信