{"title":"From proof and unproof to critical fabulation: a response to Frieman","authors":"Rachel J. Crellin","doi":"10.15184/aqy.2024.150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In her debate article, Frieman's (2024) reflections on the idea of unproof are a welcome and elegant addition to current debate on the nature of archaeological evidence, how we construct the stories we tell about the past, and the role of archaeology in the contemporary world. Frieman draws on both feminist and anarchist theory to argue that the value of archaeology is the way it allows us to grasp worlds different from our own and suggests that this can allow us to pre-figure better future worlds. This chimes closely with other recent work on the subject (e.g. Barton 2021; Cipolla <span>et al</span>. 2024; Schofield 2024)—clearly, archaeologists are considering the radical potential of our own discipline to change the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":8058,"journal":{"name":"Antiquity","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antiquity","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15184/aqy.2024.150","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In her debate article, Frieman's (2024) reflections on the idea of unproof are a welcome and elegant addition to current debate on the nature of archaeological evidence, how we construct the stories we tell about the past, and the role of archaeology in the contemporary world. Frieman draws on both feminist and anarchist theory to argue that the value of archaeology is the way it allows us to grasp worlds different from our own and suggests that this can allow us to pre-figure better future worlds. This chimes closely with other recent work on the subject (e.g. Barton 2021; Cipolla et al. 2024; Schofield 2024)—clearly, archaeologists are considering the radical potential of our own discipline to change the world.
在她的辩论文章中,弗里德曼(2024)对“无证据”概念的反思是当前关于考古证据本质、我们如何构建关于过去的故事以及考古学在当代世界中的作用的辩论的一个受欢迎和优雅的补充。弗里德曼借鉴了女权主义和无政府主义理论,认为考古学的价值在于它使我们能够把握与我们自己的世界不同的世界,并暗示这可以让我们预见更美好的未来世界。这与近期其他关于这一主题的作品(如《Barton 2021》;Cipolla et al. 2024;斯科菲尔德2024)——很明显,考古学家正在考虑我们自己的学科改变世界的巨大潜力。