[Correction of low to moderate corneal astigmatism by steep-axis incision in image-guided cataract surgery].

Q3 Medicine
M Y Wang, C Liu, Y Zhang, Y Chen, Q Wu
{"title":"[Correction of low to moderate corneal astigmatism by steep-axis incision in image-guided cataract surgery].","authors":"M Y Wang, C Liu, Y Zhang, Y Chen, Q Wu","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240508-00211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the corrective effect of cataract extraction surgery combined with a 2.8 mm steep-axis corneal incision under ophthalmic surgical navigation on low-to-moderate corneal astigmatism and different types of corneal astigmatism. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with age-related cataract who underwent cataract extraction combined with single-focus intraocular lens implantation in the Department of Ophthalmology at the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from June to October 2023 and had a total corneal regular astigmatism degree of ≥0.50 D and <1.50 D were continuously collected. Patients were divided into a low-degree group (<1.00 D) and a moderate-degree group (≥1.00 D) according to corneal astigmatism degree. Simultaneously, they were classified into with-the-rule (WTR), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism based on preoperative corneal astigmatism axis position. Subjective refraction and anterior segment biometer examination were performed before and 3 months after surgery, respectively. Vector analysis of corneal astigmatism was conducted using the Alpins vector analysis method. The main observational indicators included target induced astigmatism, surgically induced astigmatism, and the correction index. <b>Results:</b> A total of 95 patients (110 eyes) were collected in this study. Thirteen patients (18 eyes) were lost to follow-up, and finally 82 patients (92 eyes) were included. In the low-degree group, there were 14 males (16 eyes) and 26 females (23 eyes), with an age of (69.62±12.22) years. In the moderate-degree group, there were 13 males (15 eyes) and 33 females (35 eyes), with an age of (72.98±8.28) years. The target astigmatism correction amount, surgically induced astigmatism, and deviation vector in the low-degree group were all smaller than those in the moderate-degree group (all <i>P</i><0.05). Postoperative corneal astigmatism in both groups was undercorrected. The correction index in the low-degree group (0.88±0.44) was greater than that in the moderate-degree group (0.59±0.34) (<i>P</i>=0.001), and the undercorrection proportion in the moderate-degree group (90.00%, 45/50) was much higher than that in the low-degree group (57.14%, 24/42). In the low-degree group, the correction index from high to low was WTR (1.07±0.41), oblique (0.90±0.58), and ATR astigmatism eyes (0.69±0.37). After multiple comparison analysis, the correction index of WTR astigmatism eyes was significantly higher than that of ATR astigmatism eyes (<i>P<</i>0.05). The success index from high to low was oblique (0.82±0.57), ATR (0.74±0.39), and WTR astigmatism eyes (0.68±0.43). In the moderate-degree group, the order of the correction index from high to low was the same as that in the low-degree group, also WTR (0.79±0.33), oblique (0.71±0.50), and ATR astigmatism eyes (0.53±0.30), but there was no statistical significance among the three (<i>P</i>>0.05). In the low-degree group, there were 6 WTR astigmatism eyes undercorrected, fewer than 12 overcorrected eyes; there were 16 ATR astigmatism eyes undercorrected, more than 3 overcorrected eyes. In the moderate-degree group, there were 6 WTR astigmatism eyes undercorrected, more than 2 overcorrected eyes, but there were 2 ATR astigmatism eyes overcorrected, fewer than 34 undercorrected eyes. <b>Conclusions:</b> Cataract extraction surgery combined with a steep-axis corneal incision can achieve a certain astigmatism correction effect in patients with preoperative low-to-moderate corneal astigmatism. Patients with a preoperative corneal astigmatism degree of mild can achieve a better astigmatism correction effect than those with moderate, especially in the WTR astigmatism population. However, for cataract patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of moderate and WTR astigmatism, a steep-axis corneal incision can also be combined to correct astigmatism as it can achieve the expected postoperative \"with-the-rule undercorrection\".</p>","PeriodicalId":39688,"journal":{"name":"中华眼科杂志","volume":"60 12","pages":"977-984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华眼科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20240508-00211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the corrective effect of cataract extraction surgery combined with a 2.8 mm steep-axis corneal incision under ophthalmic surgical navigation on low-to-moderate corneal astigmatism and different types of corneal astigmatism. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted. Patients with age-related cataract who underwent cataract extraction combined with single-focus intraocular lens implantation in the Department of Ophthalmology at the Sixth People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine from June to October 2023 and had a total corneal regular astigmatism degree of ≥0.50 D and <1.50 D were continuously collected. Patients were divided into a low-degree group (<1.00 D) and a moderate-degree group (≥1.00 D) according to corneal astigmatism degree. Simultaneously, they were classified into with-the-rule (WTR), against-the-rule (ATR), and oblique astigmatism based on preoperative corneal astigmatism axis position. Subjective refraction and anterior segment biometer examination were performed before and 3 months after surgery, respectively. Vector analysis of corneal astigmatism was conducted using the Alpins vector analysis method. The main observational indicators included target induced astigmatism, surgically induced astigmatism, and the correction index. Results: A total of 95 patients (110 eyes) were collected in this study. Thirteen patients (18 eyes) were lost to follow-up, and finally 82 patients (92 eyes) were included. In the low-degree group, there were 14 males (16 eyes) and 26 females (23 eyes), with an age of (69.62±12.22) years. In the moderate-degree group, there were 13 males (15 eyes) and 33 females (35 eyes), with an age of (72.98±8.28) years. The target astigmatism correction amount, surgically induced astigmatism, and deviation vector in the low-degree group were all smaller than those in the moderate-degree group (all P<0.05). Postoperative corneal astigmatism in both groups was undercorrected. The correction index in the low-degree group (0.88±0.44) was greater than that in the moderate-degree group (0.59±0.34) (P=0.001), and the undercorrection proportion in the moderate-degree group (90.00%, 45/50) was much higher than that in the low-degree group (57.14%, 24/42). In the low-degree group, the correction index from high to low was WTR (1.07±0.41), oblique (0.90±0.58), and ATR astigmatism eyes (0.69±0.37). After multiple comparison analysis, the correction index of WTR astigmatism eyes was significantly higher than that of ATR astigmatism eyes (P<0.05). The success index from high to low was oblique (0.82±0.57), ATR (0.74±0.39), and WTR astigmatism eyes (0.68±0.43). In the moderate-degree group, the order of the correction index from high to low was the same as that in the low-degree group, also WTR (0.79±0.33), oblique (0.71±0.50), and ATR astigmatism eyes (0.53±0.30), but there was no statistical significance among the three (P>0.05). In the low-degree group, there were 6 WTR astigmatism eyes undercorrected, fewer than 12 overcorrected eyes; there were 16 ATR astigmatism eyes undercorrected, more than 3 overcorrected eyes. In the moderate-degree group, there were 6 WTR astigmatism eyes undercorrected, more than 2 overcorrected eyes, but there were 2 ATR astigmatism eyes overcorrected, fewer than 34 undercorrected eyes. Conclusions: Cataract extraction surgery combined with a steep-axis corneal incision can achieve a certain astigmatism correction effect in patients with preoperative low-to-moderate corneal astigmatism. Patients with a preoperative corneal astigmatism degree of mild can achieve a better astigmatism correction effect than those with moderate, especially in the WTR astigmatism population. However, for cataract patients with preoperative corneal astigmatism of moderate and WTR astigmatism, a steep-axis corneal incision can also be combined to correct astigmatism as it can achieve the expected postoperative "with-the-rule undercorrection".

[图像引导白内障手术中通过陡轴切口矫正中低度角膜散光]。
目的:探讨眼科手术导航下白内障摘出联合2.8 mm陡轴角膜切口对中低度角膜散光及不同类型角膜散光的矫正效果。方法:采用前瞻性队列研究。研究对象为2023年6月至10月在上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院眼科行白内障摘出联合单焦人工晶状体植入术的年龄相关性白内障患者,角膜常规总散光度≥0.50 D。结果:本研究共收集95例患者(110只眼)。失访13例(18眼),最终纳入82例(92眼)。低度组男性14例(16眼),女性26例(23眼),年龄(69.62±12.22)岁。中度组男性13例(15眼),女性33例(35眼),年龄(72.98±8.28)岁。低度数组的目标散光校正量、手术引起的散光、偏差矢量均小于中等度数组(均PP=0.001),中等度数组的欠校正比例(90.00%,45/50)远高于低度数组(57.14%,24/42)。低度数组的矫正指数由高到低依次为WTR(1.07±0.41)、斜斜(0.90±0.58)、ATR散光眼(0.69±0.37)。经多次比较分析,WTR散光眼的矫正指数显著高于ATR散光眼(P0.05)。成功指数由高到低依次为斜眼(0.82±0.57)、ATR(0.74±0.39)、WTR散光眼(0.68±0.43)。中等度数组矫正指数由高到低的顺序与低度数组相同,均为WTR(0.79±0.33)、斜斜(0.71±0.50)、ATR散光眼(0.53±0.30),但三者间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。低度数组WTR散光眼矫正不足6眼,过度矫正不足12眼;ATR散光眼矫正不足16眼,矫正过度3眼以上。中度组WTR散光眼矫正不足6只,过度矫正2只以上,ATR散光眼矫正过度2只,不足34只。结论:白内障摘出手术联合角膜陡轴切口对术前低中度角膜散光患者可取得一定的散光矫正效果。术前角膜散光轻度患者的散光矫正效果优于中度患者,尤其是WTR散光人群。然而,对于术前角膜散光中度、轻度散光的白内障患者,也可以联合角膜陡轴切口进行散光矫正,可以达到术后预期的“有规欠矫”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华眼科杂志
中华眼科杂志 Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12700
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信