Telehealth use and receipt of recommended services within one-year postpartum.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Thomas P Kishkovich, Kaitlyn E James, Katie C Orona, Sarah N Bernstein, Jessica L Cohen, Mark A Clapp
{"title":"Telehealth use and receipt of recommended services within one-year postpartum.","authors":"Thomas P Kishkovich, Kaitlyn E James, Katie C Orona, Sarah N Bernstein, Jessica L Cohen, Mark A Clapp","doi":"10.1177/1357633X241297294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In obstetrics, telehealth is widely used in the provision of prenatal and postpartum care. The objective was to compare the utilization of commonly recommended services after delivery among individuals receiving telehealth versus in-person postpartum care.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study of individuals receiving postpartum care at a single institution between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2023. The primary exposure was the exclusive use of telehealth versus an in-person visit for postpartum care. Two primary outcomes were assessed between 0 and 365 days after the delivery: 1) long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method use and 2) pap smear screening. Secondary outcomes occurring between 0 and 365 days after delivery included: clinic-based weight assessment, clinic-based blood pressure assessment, any prescription contraception use, primary care visit, and pregnancy within 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 9953 individuals, 9058 (91.0%) had a postpartum visit. 1811 (19.9%) utilized telehealth exclusively, which peaked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusive telehealth users were less likely to have a pap smear (21.6 vs. 40.1%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) or use LARCs (8.6 vs. 19.4%, <i>p</i> < 0.001) than those receiving in-person care. In the adjusted analysis, the odds ratio for receiving a pap smear was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.47) and for using a LARC was 0.38 (95% CI 0.31-0.47) when comparing telehealth to in-person care. Reduced odds of all secondary outcomes were seen in the exclusive telehealth use compared to the in-person cohort, with the exception of subsequent pregnancy within 1 year, which was not significantly different.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Acknowledging that telehealth now has become an important means for patients to access medical care, these findings should prompt clinicians to consider when an in-person postpartum visit should be offered or recommended over telehealth, especially when a patient may not have a preference or reported barriers to accessing an in-person visit.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X241297294"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X241297294","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In obstetrics, telehealth is widely used in the provision of prenatal and postpartum care. The objective was to compare the utilization of commonly recommended services after delivery among individuals receiving telehealth versus in-person postpartum care.

Study design: We performed a retrospective cohort study of individuals receiving postpartum care at a single institution between 1 July 2020 and 30 June 2023. The primary exposure was the exclusive use of telehealth versus an in-person visit for postpartum care. Two primary outcomes were assessed between 0 and 365 days after the delivery: 1) long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method use and 2) pap smear screening. Secondary outcomes occurring between 0 and 365 days after delivery included: clinic-based weight assessment, clinic-based blood pressure assessment, any prescription contraception use, primary care visit, and pregnancy within 1 year.

Results: Among the 9953 individuals, 9058 (91.0%) had a postpartum visit. 1811 (19.9%) utilized telehealth exclusively, which peaked during the COVID-19 pandemic. Exclusive telehealth users were less likely to have a pap smear (21.6 vs. 40.1%, p < 0.001) or use LARCs (8.6 vs. 19.4%, p < 0.001) than those receiving in-person care. In the adjusted analysis, the odds ratio for receiving a pap smear was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32-0.47) and for using a LARC was 0.38 (95% CI 0.31-0.47) when comparing telehealth to in-person care. Reduced odds of all secondary outcomes were seen in the exclusive telehealth use compared to the in-person cohort, with the exception of subsequent pregnancy within 1 year, which was not significantly different.

Discussion: Acknowledging that telehealth now has become an important means for patients to access medical care, these findings should prompt clinicians to consider when an in-person postpartum visit should be offered or recommended over telehealth, especially when a patient may not have a preference or reported barriers to accessing an in-person visit.

产后一年内远程保健的使用和建议服务的接受情况。
在产科,远程医疗被广泛用于提供产前和产后护理。目的是比较在分娩后接受远程保健和亲自产后护理的个人对常用推荐服务的利用情况。研究设计:我们对2020年7月1日至2023年6月30日在单一机构接受产后护理的个体进行了回顾性队列研究。主要暴露是专门使用远程医疗,而不是亲自访问产后护理。在分娩后0至365天评估两个主要结局:1)长效可逆避孕(LARC)方法的使用和2)巴氏涂片筛查。分娩后0至365天发生的次要结局包括:临床体重评估、临床血压评估、任何处方避孕使用、初级保健就诊和1年内妊娠。结果:9953例患者中有9058例(91.0%)进行过产后随访。1811家医院(19.9%)专门使用远程医疗,在COVID-19大流行期间达到高峰。讨论:承认远程医疗现在已经成为患者获得医疗保健的重要手段,这些发现应该促使临床医生考虑何时应该提供或推荐面对面的产后检查,而不是远程医疗,特别是当患者可能没有偏好或报告的障碍时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信