Minimizing Omental Bleeding Risk Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: Assessing the Double-line Sealing Technique.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Muhammed Said Dalkiliç, Mehmet Gençtürk, Merih Yilmaz, Hasan Erdem, Abdullah Şişik
{"title":"Minimizing Omental Bleeding Risk Following Sleeve Gastrectomy: Assessing the Double-line Sealing Technique.","authors":"Muhammed Said Dalkiliç, Mehmet Gençtürk, Merih Yilmaz, Hasan Erdem, Abdullah Şişik","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most commonly performed bariatric procedure due to its technical simplicity and effectiveness. While stapler line reinforcement has significantly reduced hemorrhagic complications, postoperative bleeding remains a concern, particularly from omentum or unidentified sources. The LigaSure device, known for sealing vessels successfully up to 7 mm in diameter, may face challenges in obese patients due to excessive omental fat. This study introduces a double-sealing technique as a simple solution aimed at reducing postoperative bleeding related to patient-specific factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducts a retrospective analysis to evaluate the double-line omental sealing technique in LSG, an intervention aimed at reducing the incidence of postoperative bleeding. We compared outcomes from 222 patients using the double-line sealing (DLS) technique and 297 patients with standard dissection. DLS technique involves creating 2 adjacent rows of seals on the omentum during dissection, aiming to minimize bleeding risks. Patient demographics, including age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities, were examined, alongside operative time, length of hospital stay, and instances of reoperation. Special attention was given to identifying cases of severe postoperative bleeding, primarily determined by the need for blood transfusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No demographic differences emerged between the groups. The study group, which utilized DLS, demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of intraperitoneal severe bleeding (0.45%) compared with the control group (3%). Reoperations were significantly reduced, with only 2 cases (0.67%) in the control group and none in the DLS group. It also correlates with reduced length of hospital stay but increased operative time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DLS in LSG shows promise in reducing severe postoperative bleeding. Despite these positive initial findings, further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to fully ascertain the efficacy and safety of this technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001323","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the most commonly performed bariatric procedure due to its technical simplicity and effectiveness. While stapler line reinforcement has significantly reduced hemorrhagic complications, postoperative bleeding remains a concern, particularly from omentum or unidentified sources. The LigaSure device, known for sealing vessels successfully up to 7 mm in diameter, may face challenges in obese patients due to excessive omental fat. This study introduces a double-sealing technique as a simple solution aimed at reducing postoperative bleeding related to patient-specific factors.

Methods: This study conducts a retrospective analysis to evaluate the double-line omental sealing technique in LSG, an intervention aimed at reducing the incidence of postoperative bleeding. We compared outcomes from 222 patients using the double-line sealing (DLS) technique and 297 patients with standard dissection. DLS technique involves creating 2 adjacent rows of seals on the omentum during dissection, aiming to minimize bleeding risks. Patient demographics, including age, sex, body mass index, and comorbidities, were examined, alongside operative time, length of hospital stay, and instances of reoperation. Special attention was given to identifying cases of severe postoperative bleeding, primarily determined by the need for blood transfusion.

Results: No demographic differences emerged between the groups. The study group, which utilized DLS, demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of intraperitoneal severe bleeding (0.45%) compared with the control group (3%). Reoperations were significantly reduced, with only 2 cases (0.67%) in the control group and none in the DLS group. It also correlates with reduced length of hospital stay but increased operative time.

Conclusions: DLS in LSG shows promise in reducing severe postoperative bleeding. Despite these positive initial findings, further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to fully ascertain the efficacy and safety of this technique.

减少套筒胃切除术后大网膜出血风险:评估双线缝合技术。
目的:腹腔镜袖胃切除术(LSG)由于其技术简单和有效,已成为最常用的减肥手术。虽然吻合器线加固可显著减少出血并发症,但术后出血仍然令人担忧,特别是来自网膜或不明来源的出血。LigaSure设备可以成功密封直径达7毫米的血管,但由于大网膜脂肪过多,肥胖患者可能面临挑战。本研究介绍了一种双重密封技术,作为一种简单的解决方案,旨在减少与患者特异性因素相关的术后出血。方法:本研究通过回顾性分析,评价双线网膜封闭技术在LSG中用于降低术后出血发生率的干预措施。我们比较了222例采用双线缝合(DLS)技术的患者和297例采用标准解剖的患者的结果。DLS技术包括在分离过程中在网膜上形成相邻的两行密封,旨在最大限度地降低出血风险。检查患者的人口统计数据,包括年龄、性别、体重指数和合并症,以及手术时间、住院时间和再次手术的情况。特别注意识别严重的术后出血病例,主要取决于是否需要输血。结果:两组间无人口统计学差异。使用DLS的研究组与对照组(3%)相比,腹腔内严重出血的发生率显著降低(0.45%)。再手术明显减少,对照组仅2例(0.67%),DLS组无再手术。它还与住院时间缩短但手术时间增加有关。结论:DLS在减少LSG术后严重出血方面有希望。尽管有这些积极的初步发现,但建议进行更大样本量的进一步研究,以充分确定该技术的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信