Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) Questionnaire.

Q3 Medicine
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia Pub Date : 2024-12-07 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1790216
Jose Carlos Souza Vilela, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Daniel Oliveira Araujo, Yuri Vinicius Teles Gomes, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado
{"title":"Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) Questionnaire.","authors":"Jose Carlos Souza Vilela, Tadeu Fonseca Barbosa, Daniel Oliveira Araujo, Yuri Vinicius Teles Gomes, Thalles Leandro Abreu Machado","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective</b>  To evaluate the validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). <b>Methods</b>  We assessed 51 patients aged 18 to 40 years who were divided into 3 groups: 17 patients with shoulder instability undergoing conservative treatment, 17 with shoulder instability treated surgically, and 17 without shoulder instability. The patients underwent functional and health assessments using the following scores: WOSI, Rowe, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Scale. <b>Results</b>  The variables sex and age were homogeneous among the groups ( <i>p</i>  > 0.05). A comparative analysis of the scores revealed that patients undergoing treatment (either surgical or conservative) showed significant differences compared with the control group ( <i>p</i>  < 0.05). The determination of score correlation was made using the Spearman correlation coefficient. All instruments analyzed showed a significant relationship among themselves but at different levels: the correlation between the WOSI and DASH instruments was perfectly positive ( <i>r</i>  = 0.96); the comparison of the WOSI and UCLA ( <i>r</i>  = 0.87), DASH and UCLA ( <i>r</i>  = 0.86), SSV and Rowe ( <i>r</i>  = 0.80), VAS and DASH (r = 0.75), VAS and UCLA ( <i>r</i>  = 0.74), and WOSI and VAS ( <i>r</i>  = 0.72) also showed a trend towards positive linearity among measurements; and the comparison of the instruments WOSI and SSV, WOSI and Rowe, DASH and Rowe, SSV and UCLA ( <i>r</i>  = -0.83), SSV and DASH ( <i>r</i>  = -0.79), Rowe and UCLA ( <i>r</i>  = -0.78), VAS and SSV ( <i>r</i>  = -0.68), and VAS and Rowe ( <i>r</i>  = -0.60) revealed a negative correlation. <b>Conclusion</b>  The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WOSI presents good validity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21536,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","volume":"59 5","pages":"e765-e770"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624921/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective  To evaluate the validity of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Methods  We assessed 51 patients aged 18 to 40 years who were divided into 3 groups: 17 patients with shoulder instability undergoing conservative treatment, 17 with shoulder instability treated surgically, and 17 without shoulder instability. The patients underwent functional and health assessments using the following scores: WOSI, Rowe, Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Subjective Shoulder Value (SSV), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) Shoulder Scale. Results  The variables sex and age were homogeneous among the groups ( p  > 0.05). A comparative analysis of the scores revealed that patients undergoing treatment (either surgical or conservative) showed significant differences compared with the control group ( p  < 0.05). The determination of score correlation was made using the Spearman correlation coefficient. All instruments analyzed showed a significant relationship among themselves but at different levels: the correlation between the WOSI and DASH instruments was perfectly positive ( r  = 0.96); the comparison of the WOSI and UCLA ( r  = 0.87), DASH and UCLA ( r  = 0.86), SSV and Rowe ( r  = 0.80), VAS and DASH (r = 0.75), VAS and UCLA ( r  = 0.74), and WOSI and VAS ( r  = 0.72) also showed a trend towards positive linearity among measurements; and the comparison of the instruments WOSI and SSV, WOSI and Rowe, DASH and Rowe, SSV and UCLA ( r  = -0.83), SSV and DASH ( r  = -0.79), Rowe and UCLA ( r  = -0.78), VAS and SSV ( r  = -0.68), and VAS and Rowe ( r  = -0.60) revealed a negative correlation. Conclusion  The Brazilian Portuguese version of the WOSI presents good validity.

西安大略省肩部不稳定指数(WOSI)问卷的巴西葡萄牙语版验证。
目的评价巴西葡萄牙语版西安大略省肩关节不稳定指数(WOSI)的有效性。方法将51例年龄在18 ~ 40岁的患者分为3组:保守治疗的肩关节不稳定患者17例,手术治疗的肩关节不稳定患者17例,无肩关节不稳定患者17例。使用以下评分对患者进行功能和健康评估:WOSI, Rowe,视觉模拟量表(VAS),主观肩值(SSV),手臂,肩膀和手的残疾(DASH)和加州大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)肩部量表。结果各组间性别、年龄等变量均无明显差异(p < 0.05)。对评分的比较分析显示,接受手术或保守治疗的患者与对照组相比有显著差异(p r = 0.96);WOSI与UCLA (r = 0.87)、DASH与UCLA (r = 0.86)、SSV与Rowe (r = 0.80)、VAS与DASH (r = 0.75)、VAS与UCLA (r = 0.74)、WOSI与VAS (r = 0.72)的比较也呈现线性正相关趋势;WOSI与SSV、WOSI与Rowe、DASH与Rowe、SSV与UCLA (r = -0.83)、SSV与DASH (r = -0.79)、Rowe与UCLA (r = -0.78)、VAS与SSV (r = -0.68)、VAS与Rowe (r = -0.60)的比较均呈负相关。结论巴西葡萄牙语版WOSI具有较好的效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信