Valproic Acid for Hyperactive Delirium and Agitation in Critically Ill Patients.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Olivia Nuti, Cristian Merchan, Tania Ahuja, Serena Arnouk, John Papadopoulos, Alyson Katz
{"title":"Valproic Acid for Hyperactive Delirium and Agitation in Critically Ill Patients.","authors":"Olivia Nuti, Cristian Merchan, Tania Ahuja, Serena Arnouk, John Papadopoulos, Alyson Katz","doi":"10.1177/08850666241302760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium and agitation are common syndromes in critically ill patients. Valproic acid (VPA) has shown benefit in intensive care unit (ICU)-associated delirium and agitation, but further evaluation is needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VPA for hyperactive delirium and agitation in critically ill adult patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at NYU Langone Health was conducted in critically ill patients treated with VPA for hyperactive delirium or agitation from October 1, 2017 to October 1, 2022. The primary outcome was effectiveness of VPA, defined as a reduction in the total number of any concomitant psychoactive medication by day 3 of VPA treatment. Secondary outcomes included the effect of VPA on the doses of concomitant medications and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 87 patients were included in the final analysis. By day 3 of VPA treatment, a 33% reduction (<i>P</i> < .001) in the total number of concomitant psychoactive medications was observed. VPA decreased the need for sedatives, as assessed by midazolam equivalents, but no significant changes were seen with dexmedetomidine alone, opioids, or antipsychotics. A 10 mg/kg loading dose was utilized in 36% of the cohort and its use decreased the risk for initiating additional psychoactive medications by day 3 of therapy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0-7.8, <i>P</i> = .047), with benefits noted as early as 48 h after initiation. Adverse events were low in the total cohort (10.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>The addition of VPA to a complex pharmacologic regimen for hyperactive delirium and agitation is safe and can assist in the prevention of polypharmacy and overall workload in critically ill patients admitted primarily for cardiogenic shock and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"8850666241302760"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666241302760","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium and agitation are common syndromes in critically ill patients. Valproic acid (VPA) has shown benefit in intensive care unit (ICU)-associated delirium and agitation, but further evaluation is needed.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VPA for hyperactive delirium and agitation in critically ill adult patients.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study at NYU Langone Health was conducted in critically ill patients treated with VPA for hyperactive delirium or agitation from October 1, 2017 to October 1, 2022. The primary outcome was effectiveness of VPA, defined as a reduction in the total number of any concomitant psychoactive medication by day 3 of VPA treatment. Secondary outcomes included the effect of VPA on the doses of concomitant medications and adverse events.

Results: A total of 87 patients were included in the final analysis. By day 3 of VPA treatment, a 33% reduction (P < .001) in the total number of concomitant psychoactive medications was observed. VPA decreased the need for sedatives, as assessed by midazolam equivalents, but no significant changes were seen with dexmedetomidine alone, opioids, or antipsychotics. A 10 mg/kg loading dose was utilized in 36% of the cohort and its use decreased the risk for initiating additional psychoactive medications by day 3 of therapy (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.0-7.8, P = .047), with benefits noted as early as 48 h after initiation. Adverse events were low in the total cohort (10.3%).

Conclusion and relevance: The addition of VPA to a complex pharmacologic regimen for hyperactive delirium and agitation is safe and can assist in the prevention of polypharmacy and overall workload in critically ill patients admitted primarily for cardiogenic shock and respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation.

丙戊酸治疗危重症患者过度活跃谵妄和躁动。
背景:谵妄和躁动是危重症患者的常见症状。丙戊酸(VPA)已显示出对重症监护病房(ICU)相关谵妄和躁动的益处,但需要进一步评估。目的:评价VPA治疗危重成人多动性谵妄和躁动的有效性和安全性。方法:对2017年10月1日至2022年10月1日在纽约大学朗格尼健康中心(NYU Langone Health)接受VPA治疗的多动性谵妄或躁动的危重患者进行回顾性队列研究。主要结果是VPA的有效性,定义为在VPA治疗的第3天减少任何伴随精神活性药物的总数。次要结局包括VPA对伴随用药剂量和不良事件的影响。结果:87例患者纳入最终分析。到VPA治疗的第3天,减少了33% (P = 0.047),早在开始治疗后48小时就有益处。整个队列的不良事件发生率较低(10.3%)。结论及意义:在复杂的药物治疗方案中加入VPA治疗多动性谵妄和躁动是安全的,并有助于预防主要因心源性休克和呼吸衰竭需要机械通气的危重患者的多药治疗和总工作量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信