Barriers, facilitators and next steps for sustaining and scaling virtual hospital services in Australia: a qualitative descriptive study

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nicki Newton, Kavisha Shah, Miranda Shaw, Emma Charlston, Melissa T Baysari, Angus Ritchie, Chenyao Yu, Adam Johnston, Jagdev Singh, Meredith Makeham, Sarah Norris, Liliana Laranjo, Clara K Chow, Tim Shaw
{"title":"Barriers, facilitators and next steps for sustaining and scaling virtual hospital services in Australia: a qualitative descriptive study","authors":"Nicki Newton,&nbsp;Kavisha Shah,&nbsp;Miranda Shaw,&nbsp;Emma Charlston,&nbsp;Melissa T Baysari,&nbsp;Angus Ritchie,&nbsp;Chenyao Yu,&nbsp;Adam Johnston,&nbsp;Jagdev Singh,&nbsp;Meredith Makeham,&nbsp;Sarah Norris,&nbsp;Liliana Laranjo,&nbsp;Clara K Chow,&nbsp;Tim Shaw","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To describe the barriers to and facilitators of implementing and delivering virtual hospital (VH) services, and evidence and practice gaps where further research and policy changes are needed to drive continuous improvement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Study design</h3>\n \n <p>Qualitative descriptive study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting, participants</h3>\n \n <p>Online semi-structured interviews and a focus group were conducted between July 2022 and April 2023 with doctors, nurses and leadership staff involved in VH services at three sites in New South Wales, Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main outcome measures</h3>\n \n <p>Barriers to and facilitators of implementing and delivering VH services in sites with differing operating structures and levels of maturity, and evidence and practice gaps relating to VH services.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 22 individuals took part in the study. Barriers, facilitators, and evidence and practice gaps emerged within five major themes: scope and structure of VH services; development and implementation of VH models of care; delivery of VH models of care; evaluation of VHs and VH models of care; and sustainment and scalability of VH services. Facilitators of VH success included hybrid approaches to care, partnerships with external services, and skills of the VH workforce. Barriers and gaps in evidence and practice included technical challenges, the need to define the role of VH services, the need to evaluate the tangible impact of VH care models and technologies, and the need to develop funding models that support VH care delivery. Participants also highlighted the perceived impacts and benefits of VH services on the workforce (within and beyond the VH setting), consumers, and the health care system.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings can help inform the development of new VH services and the improvement of existing VH services. As VH services become more mainstream, gaps in evidence and practice must be addressed by future research and policy changes to maximise the benefits.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 S11","pages":"S37-S48"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52526","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To describe the barriers to and facilitators of implementing and delivering virtual hospital (VH) services, and evidence and practice gaps where further research and policy changes are needed to drive continuous improvement.

Study design

Qualitative descriptive study.

Setting, participants

Online semi-structured interviews and a focus group were conducted between July 2022 and April 2023 with doctors, nurses and leadership staff involved in VH services at three sites in New South Wales, Australia.

Main outcome measures

Barriers to and facilitators of implementing and delivering VH services in sites with differing operating structures and levels of maturity, and evidence and practice gaps relating to VH services.

Results

A total of 22 individuals took part in the study. Barriers, facilitators, and evidence and practice gaps emerged within five major themes: scope and structure of VH services; development and implementation of VH models of care; delivery of VH models of care; evaluation of VHs and VH models of care; and sustainment and scalability of VH services. Facilitators of VH success included hybrid approaches to care, partnerships with external services, and skills of the VH workforce. Barriers and gaps in evidence and practice included technical challenges, the need to define the role of VH services, the need to evaluate the tangible impact of VH care models and technologies, and the need to develop funding models that support VH care delivery. Participants also highlighted the perceived impacts and benefits of VH services on the workforce (within and beyond the VH setting), consumers, and the health care system.

Conclusions

Our findings can help inform the development of new VH services and the improvement of existing VH services. As VH services become more mainstream, gaps in evidence and practice must be addressed by future research and policy changes to maximise the benefits.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信