Justine Panian, Caiwei Zhong, Sharon H Choi, Kristine Ly, Roxanne Quinn, Evan Ferrier, Eddy Saad, Renee Maria Saliby, Carmel Malvar, Sumanta Pal, Hedyeh Ebrahimi, Ben Tran, Evon Jude, Aly-Khan Lalani, Cristina Suarez, Guillermo De Velasco, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Martin Zarba, Elizabeth Liow, Razane El Hajj Chehade, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng, Rana R McKay
{"title":"Efficacy of Treatments After Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.","authors":"Justine Panian, Caiwei Zhong, Sharon H Choi, Kristine Ly, Roxanne Quinn, Evan Ferrier, Eddy Saad, Renee Maria Saliby, Carmel Malvar, Sumanta Pal, Hedyeh Ebrahimi, Ben Tran, Evon Jude, Aly-Khan Lalani, Cristina Suarez, Guillermo De Velasco, Ravindran Kanesvaran, Martin Zarba, Elizabeth Liow, Razane El Hajj Chehade, Toni K Choueiri, Daniel Y C Heng, Rana R McKay","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Lenvatinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used in the upfront and refractory settings for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, there are limited data on the efficacy of subsequent TKI therapies after lenvatinib. We investigated the activity of TKI therapies after lenvatinib in patients with mRCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC). Patients who received post-lenvatinib treatment were divided into two cohorts: a second-line cohort after first-line lenvatinib; and a third-line cohort after second-line lenvatinib. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the time to treatment failure (TTF).</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Of the 168 patients included, 122 (73%) had clear-cell histology. In the second-line cohort (n = 20), all patients received first-line pembrolizumab + lenvatinib. The ORR was 50% and median TTF was 19.7 mo for first-line treatment. Median follow-up from initiation of second-line treatment was 4.9 mo. The ORR to second-line treatment was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-25%) and median TTF was 5.8 mo (95% CI 1.9-14.9). In the third-line cohort (n = 34), most patients received second-line everolimus + lenvatinib (97%). The ORR was 31% and median TTF was 9.2 mo for second-line therapy. Median follow-up from initiation of third-line treatment was 14.9 mo. The ORR to third-line treatment was 12% (95% CI 3.3-27%) and median TTF was 2.8 mo (95% CI 1.9-7.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>Our data demonstrate modest activity of TKI-based therapy after exposure to lenvatinib. The results highlight the need for better treatment options for patients who experience progression on lenvatinib-based therapies.</p><p><strong>Patient summary: </strong>Lenvatinib is a type of drug called a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It is used to treat metastatic kidney cancer either when first diagnosed or after progression on a previous treatment. There is limited information on how patients respond to a different TKI after receiving lenvatinib. Our results show that other TKIs have modest clinical activity after patients have received lenvatinib.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and objective: Lenvatinib is a multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used in the upfront and refractory settings for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, there are limited data on the efficacy of subsequent TKI therapies after lenvatinib. We investigated the activity of TKI therapies after lenvatinib in patients with mRCC.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC). Patients who received post-lenvatinib treatment were divided into two cohorts: a second-line cohort after first-line lenvatinib; and a third-line cohort after second-line lenvatinib. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included the time to treatment failure (TTF).
Key findings and limitations: Of the 168 patients included, 122 (73%) had clear-cell histology. In the second-line cohort (n = 20), all patients received first-line pembrolizumab + lenvatinib. The ORR was 50% and median TTF was 19.7 mo for first-line treatment. Median follow-up from initiation of second-line treatment was 4.9 mo. The ORR to second-line treatment was 5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.2-25%) and median TTF was 5.8 mo (95% CI 1.9-14.9). In the third-line cohort (n = 34), most patients received second-line everolimus + lenvatinib (97%). The ORR was 31% and median TTF was 9.2 mo for second-line therapy. Median follow-up from initiation of third-line treatment was 14.9 mo. The ORR to third-line treatment was 12% (95% CI 3.3-27%) and median TTF was 2.8 mo (95% CI 1.9-7.4).
Conclusions and clinical implications: Our data demonstrate modest activity of TKI-based therapy after exposure to lenvatinib. The results highlight the need for better treatment options for patients who experience progression on lenvatinib-based therapies.
Patient summary: Lenvatinib is a type of drug called a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). It is used to treat metastatic kidney cancer either when first diagnosed or after progression on a previous treatment. There is limited information on how patients respond to a different TKI after receiving lenvatinib. Our results show that other TKIs have modest clinical activity after patients have received lenvatinib.
期刊介绍:
European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU).
EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.