Measurement of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in serum by LC-MS/MS compared to immunoassay reveals inconsistent agreement in paediatric samples.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Jonathan C Y Tang, Rachel Dunn, John J Dutton, Amrou Farag, Isabelle Piec, Allison Chipchase, Julie Greeves, William D Fraser, Emma A Webb
{"title":"Measurement of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D in serum by LC-MS/MS compared to immunoassay reveals inconsistent agreement in paediatric samples.","authors":"Jonathan C Y Tang, Rachel Dunn, John J Dutton, Amrou Farag, Isabelle Piec, Allison Chipchase, Julie Greeves, William D Fraser, Emma A Webb","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Automated immunoassays for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D) have increased the use of serum measurements in clinical and research settings, but disagreement with LC-MS/MS methods remains an issue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, we examined this problem using samples obtained from healthy young adults, n=80, mean age 21.7 (18-32) years, and a large cohort of paediatric samples, n=422, mean age 7.3 (0-17) years. We compared serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D3/D2 produced by the DiaSorin LIAISON<sup>®</sup> XL immunoassay against an LC-MS/MS method with immunoaffinity enrichment and DAPTAD derivation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both assays showed intra/inter-assay imprecision of ≤9.4 % across their respective assay range. DEQAS between April 2020 to Jan 2024 (n=80) showed mean bias (SD, 95 %CI) for DiaSorin -0.6 % (6.2, -12.8 to 11.6) and LC-MS/MS of +1.3 % (7.4, -13.3 to 15.8) against their respective method group means. Comparison of measurements in the adult samples showed a strong correlation (r<sup>2</sup>=0.9331) and concordance (CCC=0.959) between the two methods. LC-MS/MS values were lower than DiaSorin by an overall mean (±SD, 95 %CI) of -1.6 (±14.3, -29.6 to 26.5) pmol/L with an increased negative bias at higher concentrations. In the paediatric samples, weaker correlation (r<sup>2</sup>=0.6536) and concordance (CCC=0.782) were observed, with greater bias mean (±SD, 95 %CI) of -9.8 (±23.4, -55.7 to 35.9) pmol/L. The variability in the paediatric samples was not associated with concentration or participant age. There was an increase in the correlation and concordance when 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D2 was included in the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is likely that the metabolites of vitamin D present in the paediatric population contributed to the measurement of 1,25(OH)<sub>2</sub>D. The inconsistent agreement highlights the need for better assay harmonisation and paediatric reference intervals using LC-MS/MS method.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Automated immunoassays for 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D) have increased the use of serum measurements in clinical and research settings, but disagreement with LC-MS/MS methods remains an issue.

Methods: In this study, we examined this problem using samples obtained from healthy young adults, n=80, mean age 21.7 (18-32) years, and a large cohort of paediatric samples, n=422, mean age 7.3 (0-17) years. We compared serum concentrations of 1,25(OH)2D3/D2 produced by the DiaSorin LIAISON® XL immunoassay against an LC-MS/MS method with immunoaffinity enrichment and DAPTAD derivation.

Results: Both assays showed intra/inter-assay imprecision of ≤9.4 % across their respective assay range. DEQAS between April 2020 to Jan 2024 (n=80) showed mean bias (SD, 95 %CI) for DiaSorin -0.6 % (6.2, -12.8 to 11.6) and LC-MS/MS of +1.3 % (7.4, -13.3 to 15.8) against their respective method group means. Comparison of measurements in the adult samples showed a strong correlation (r2=0.9331) and concordance (CCC=0.959) between the two methods. LC-MS/MS values were lower than DiaSorin by an overall mean (±SD, 95 %CI) of -1.6 (±14.3, -29.6 to 26.5) pmol/L with an increased negative bias at higher concentrations. In the paediatric samples, weaker correlation (r2=0.6536) and concordance (CCC=0.782) were observed, with greater bias mean (±SD, 95 %CI) of -9.8 (±23.4, -55.7 to 35.9) pmol/L. The variability in the paediatric samples was not associated with concentration or participant age. There was an increase in the correlation and concordance when 1,25(OH)2D2 was included in the analysis.

Conclusions: It is likely that the metabolites of vitamin D present in the paediatric population contributed to the measurement of 1,25(OH)2D. The inconsistent agreement highlights the need for better assay harmonisation and paediatric reference intervals using LC-MS/MS method.

目的:1,25-二羟基维生素 D(1,25(OH)2D)的自动免疫测定增加了血清测量在临床和研究环境中的应用,但与 LC-MS/MS 方法的不一致性仍然是一个问题:在本研究中,我们使用健康年轻成人样本(样本数=80,平均年龄 21.7 (18-32)岁)和大量儿科样本(样本数=422,平均年龄 7.3 (0-17)岁)对这一问题进行了研究。我们比较了 DiaSorin LIAISON® XL 免疫测定法与 LC-MS/MS 免疫亲和富集法和 DAPTAD 衍生法得出的血清 1,25(OH)2D3/D2浓度:结果:两种检测方法在其各自的检测范围内的检测内/检测间不精密度均≤9.4%。2020 年 4 月至 2024 年 1 月期间的 DEQAS(n=80)显示,与各自方法组的平均值相比,DiaSorin 的平均偏差(SD,95 %CI)为 -0.6 %(6.2,-12.8 至 11.6),LC-MS/MS 的平均偏差为 +1.3 %(7.4,-13.3 至 15.8)。成人样本的测量结果比较显示,两种方法之间具有很强的相关性(r2=0.9331)和一致性(CCC=0.959)。LC-MS/MS 值低于 DiaSorin,总体平均值(±SD,95 %CI)为-1.6(±14.3,-29.6 至 26.5)pmol/L,浓度越高,负偏差越大。在儿科样本中,相关性(r2=0.6536)和一致性(CCC=0.782)较弱,平均偏差(±SD,95 %CI)为-9.8(±23.4,-55.7 至 35.9)pmol/L。儿科样本的变异性与浓度或参与者年龄无关。将 1,25(OH)2D2 纳入分析后,相关性和一致性都有所提高:结论:儿科人群中存在的维生素 D 代谢物可能会影响 1,25(OH)2D 的测量。不一致的结果凸显了使用 LC-MS/MS 方法更好地协调检测方法和儿科参考区间的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信