Co-prescription of low-dose methotrexate and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and the 30-day risk of death among older adults: A cohort study.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Hasti Sadeghi, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Eric McArthur, Jessica M Sontrop, Sheikh S Abdullah, Brad L Urquhart, Richard B Kim, Flory T Muanda
{"title":"Co-prescription of low-dose methotrexate and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and the 30-day risk of death among older adults: A cohort study.","authors":"Hasti Sadeghi, Fatemeh Ahmadi, Eric McArthur, Jessica M Sontrop, Sheikh S Abdullah, Brad L Urquhart, Richard B Kim, Flory T Muanda","doi":"10.1111/bcp.16365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of death in older adults co-prescribed low-dose methotrexate and TMP-SMX vs. low-dose methotrexate and a cephalosporin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective, population-based, new-user cohort study in Ontario, Canada (April 1, 2002-August 1, 2022) using linked administrative healthcare data. Older adults taking low-dose methotrexate who were newly co-prescribed TMP-SMX (n = 1602) were matched 1:1 with those who were newly co-prescribed a cephalosporin. The primary outcome was death within 30 days of the antibiotic dispensing date. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, a hospital visit with myelosuppression and a hospitalization with persistent infection defined as the main diagnosis. Propensity score matching was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a propensity-score matched cohort of 3204 adults taking low-dose methotrexate, the 30-day risk of death was similar in adults co-prescribed TMP-SMX vs. a cephalosporin (14/1602 [0.87%] vs. 15/1602 [0.94%]; RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.45-1.93]). The risk of all-cause hospitalization (RR 1.49 [95% CI 1.13-1.97]) and infection (RR 2.78 [95% CI 1.30-5.95]) was higher in adults treated with TMP-SMX than those treated with cephalosporins.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In older adults taking low-dose methotrexate, co-prescription of TMP-SMX vs. a cephalosporin was not associated with a higher 30-day risk of death but was associated with a higher 30-day risk of all-cause hospitalization and hospital admission with persistent infection. If verified, these risks should be balanced against the benefits of co-prescribing TMP-SMX and low-dose methotrexate.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.16365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to characterize the risk of death in older adults co-prescribed low-dose methotrexate and TMP-SMX vs. low-dose methotrexate and a cephalosporin.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective, population-based, new-user cohort study in Ontario, Canada (April 1, 2002-August 1, 2022) using linked administrative healthcare data. Older adults taking low-dose methotrexate who were newly co-prescribed TMP-SMX (n = 1602) were matched 1:1 with those who were newly co-prescribed a cephalosporin. The primary outcome was death within 30 days of the antibiotic dispensing date. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalization, a hospital visit with myelosuppression and a hospitalization with persistent infection defined as the main diagnosis. Propensity score matching was used to balance comparison groups on indicators of baseline health. Risk ratios (RR) were obtained using modified Poisson regression.

Results: In a propensity-score matched cohort of 3204 adults taking low-dose methotrexate, the 30-day risk of death was similar in adults co-prescribed TMP-SMX vs. a cephalosporin (14/1602 [0.87%] vs. 15/1602 [0.94%]; RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.45-1.93]). The risk of all-cause hospitalization (RR 1.49 [95% CI 1.13-1.97]) and infection (RR 2.78 [95% CI 1.30-5.95]) was higher in adults treated with TMP-SMX than those treated with cephalosporins.

Conclusions: In older adults taking low-dose methotrexate, co-prescription of TMP-SMX vs. a cephalosporin was not associated with a higher 30-day risk of death but was associated with a higher 30-day risk of all-cause hospitalization and hospital admission with persistent infection. If verified, these risks should be balanced against the benefits of co-prescribing TMP-SMX and low-dose methotrexate.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信