{"title":"High cycle tensile fatigue behavior of steel rebar reinforced - UHPFRC at high R-ratio","authors":"Jian Zhan, Alain Nussbaumer, Eugen Brühwiler","doi":"10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates the high cycle tensile fatigue behavior of steel rebar reinforced − UHPFRC elements, at a fatigue load ratio, i.e., R-ratio of 0.3, representative for structural applications. Prior to testing, magnetoscopy is conducted on each specimen to determine the local fiber orientation and volume inside UHPFRC. During testing, global specimen deformation is recorded by displacement transducers; specimen surface is monitored by digital image correlation; and strain along rebars inside the specimen is measured by fiber-optic sensors. Based on the test results, an S-N diagram with a high regression coefficient is obtained. Hereby, the normalized fatigue force S is defined as the ratio between the maximum fatigue force and the estimated specimen ultimate tensile resistance. The fatigue endurance limit is identified as being about S = 0.40. It is found that fatigue deformation of the specimen mainly occurs in the zones with low fiber orientation coefficient <mml:math altimg=\"si8.svg\"><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math> of UHPFRC (<mml:math altimg=\"si8.svg\"><mml:msub><mml:mi>μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math> decreases when average angle between fiber axis and principle tensile direction changes from 0° to 90°), where the strain along steel rebars also have their higher value and increase rates during fatigue testing. The lowest UHPFRC fiber orientation determines the locus of crack localization and of fatigue fracture of steel rebars, thus final fracture of the elements.","PeriodicalId":14112,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Fatigue","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Fatigue","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108749","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper investigates the high cycle tensile fatigue behavior of steel rebar reinforced − UHPFRC elements, at a fatigue load ratio, i.e., R-ratio of 0.3, representative for structural applications. Prior to testing, magnetoscopy is conducted on each specimen to determine the local fiber orientation and volume inside UHPFRC. During testing, global specimen deformation is recorded by displacement transducers; specimen surface is monitored by digital image correlation; and strain along rebars inside the specimen is measured by fiber-optic sensors. Based on the test results, an S-N diagram with a high regression coefficient is obtained. Hereby, the normalized fatigue force S is defined as the ratio between the maximum fatigue force and the estimated specimen ultimate tensile resistance. The fatigue endurance limit is identified as being about S = 0.40. It is found that fatigue deformation of the specimen mainly occurs in the zones with low fiber orientation coefficient μ0,y of UHPFRC (μ0,y decreases when average angle between fiber axis and principle tensile direction changes from 0° to 90°), where the strain along steel rebars also have their higher value and increase rates during fatigue testing. The lowest UHPFRC fiber orientation determines the locus of crack localization and of fatigue fracture of steel rebars, thus final fracture of the elements.
期刊介绍:
Typical subjects discussed in International Journal of Fatigue address:
Novel fatigue testing and characterization methods (new kinds of fatigue tests, critical evaluation of existing methods, in situ measurement of fatigue degradation, non-contact field measurements)
Multiaxial fatigue and complex loading effects of materials and structures, exploring state-of-the-art concepts in degradation under cyclic loading
Fatigue in the very high cycle regime, including failure mode transitions from surface to subsurface, effects of surface treatment, processing, and loading conditions
Modeling (including degradation processes and related driving forces, multiscale/multi-resolution methods, computational hierarchical and concurrent methods for coupled component and material responses, novel methods for notch root analysis, fracture mechanics, damage mechanics, crack growth kinetics, life prediction and durability, and prediction of stochastic fatigue behavior reflecting microstructure and service conditions)
Models for early stages of fatigue crack formation and growth that explicitly consider microstructure and relevant materials science aspects
Understanding the influence or manufacturing and processing route on fatigue degradation, and embedding this understanding in more predictive schemes for mitigation and design against fatigue
Prognosis and damage state awareness (including sensors, monitoring, methodology, interactive control, accelerated methods, data interpretation)
Applications of technologies associated with fatigue and their implications for structural integrity and reliability. This includes issues related to design, operation and maintenance, i.e., life cycle engineering
Smart materials and structures that can sense and mitigate fatigue degradation
Fatigue of devices and structures at small scales, including effects of process route and surfaces/interfaces.