Early mental health intervention and supported self-care for LGBTQ+ young people in the UK: a mixed-methods study.

Elizabeth McDermott, Rachael Eastham, Elizabeth Hughes, Emily Pattison, Katherine Johnson, Stephanie Davis, Steven Pryjmachuk, Ceu Mateus, Olu Jenzen, Felix McNulty
{"title":"Early mental health intervention and supported self-care for LGBTQ+ young people in the UK: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Elizabeth McDermott, Rachael Eastham, Elizabeth Hughes, Emily Pattison, Katherine Johnson, Stephanie Davis, Steven Pryjmachuk, Ceu Mateus, Olu Jenzen, Felix McNulty","doi":"10.3310/KYWA6382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people have a higher risk of poor mental health in comparison to cisgendered heterosexual young people, and they underutilise mental health services and support. In addition, there is a paucity of research conducted in United Kingdom examining mental health early intervention provision for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To produce a model of what works for early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people and increase understanding of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people's access to, navigation of, and engagement with mental health support.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This was a multi-methods theory-led case study evaluation with three distinct stages: (1) a meta-narrative review of existing literature to develop a theoretical framework to explain effective mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people; (2) an online and offline service mapping exercise to locate current mental health early intervention support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people in the United Kingdom in order to produce a service typology; and (3) a theory-led case study evaluation of 12 case study sites selected from the service typology produced in stage 2, to establish the components of appropriate quality, early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stage 1 produced an interdisciplinary theoretical framework indicating that early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus youth must prioritise addressing normative environments that marginalise youth, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus identities and mental health problems. Stage 2 mapping found 111 services, the majority in urban settings in England. There was an absence of mainstream National Health Service support that specifically addressed the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people. The majority of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus youth mental health support was provided by voluntary/community organisations. Stage 3 case study evaluation found that an <i>intersectional, youth-rights</i> approach is the most appropriate way to deliver early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people. Youth rights should underpin mental health support to address the multiple marginalisation, isolation and stigmatisation that lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people may experience and to enable them to make informed independent decisions about their own bodies and lives, and for the right to freedom of safe self-expression to be upheld. The model that we have produced contains 13 principles that are necessary to the provision of mental health support, and to improve access to, engagement with, and navigation of mental health services.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the United Kingdom, a rights-based approach to mental health service provision is not prominent. In addition, at the time of writing, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people are facing active legislative and policy attacks on their human rights. This study provides the first large-scale theory-led evaluation of early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people with common mental health problems. The resulting intersectional, youth-rights approach provides evidence on ways of improving lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people's mental health. Further research on the <i>implementation</i> of an intersectional, youth-rights approach to early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people with mental health problems is required.</p><p><strong>Study registration: </strong>This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019135722.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/09/04) and is published in full in <i>Health and Social Care Delivery Research</i>; Vol. 12, No. 47. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.</p>","PeriodicalId":519880,"journal":{"name":"Health and social care delivery research","volume":"12 47","pages":"1-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health and social care delivery research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/KYWA6382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people have a higher risk of poor mental health in comparison to cisgendered heterosexual young people, and they underutilise mental health services and support. In addition, there is a paucity of research conducted in United Kingdom examining mental health early intervention provision for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people.

Objectives: To produce a model of what works for early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people and increase understanding of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people's access to, navigation of, and engagement with mental health support.

Method: This was a multi-methods theory-led case study evaluation with three distinct stages: (1) a meta-narrative review of existing literature to develop a theoretical framework to explain effective mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people; (2) an online and offline service mapping exercise to locate current mental health early intervention support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people in the United Kingdom in order to produce a service typology; and (3) a theory-led case study evaluation of 12 case study sites selected from the service typology produced in stage 2, to establish the components of appropriate quality, early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people.

Results: Stage 1 produced an interdisciplinary theoretical framework indicating that early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus youth must prioritise addressing normative environments that marginalise youth, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus identities and mental health problems. Stage 2 mapping found 111 services, the majority in urban settings in England. There was an absence of mainstream National Health Service support that specifically addressed the needs of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people. The majority of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus youth mental health support was provided by voluntary/community organisations. Stage 3 case study evaluation found that an intersectional, youth-rights approach is the most appropriate way to deliver early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people. Youth rights should underpin mental health support to address the multiple marginalisation, isolation and stigmatisation that lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people may experience and to enable them to make informed independent decisions about their own bodies and lives, and for the right to freedom of safe self-expression to be upheld. The model that we have produced contains 13 principles that are necessary to the provision of mental health support, and to improve access to, engagement with, and navigation of mental health services.

Conclusions: In the United Kingdom, a rights-based approach to mental health service provision is not prominent. In addition, at the time of writing, lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people are facing active legislative and policy attacks on their human rights. This study provides the first large-scale theory-led evaluation of early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people with common mental health problems. The resulting intersectional, youth-rights approach provides evidence on ways of improving lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people's mental health. Further research on the implementation of an intersectional, youth-rights approach to early intervention mental health support for lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans, queer/questioning, plus young people with mental health problems is required.

Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019135722.

Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme (NIHR award ref: 17/09/04) and is published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 12, No. 47. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

英国LGBTQ+年轻人的早期心理健康干预和支持性自我护理:一项混合方法研究
背景:女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人与顺性别异性恋年轻人相比,心理健康状况不佳的风险更高,而且他们没有充分利用心理健康服务和支持。此外,联合王国对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人的心理健康早期干预措施进行的研究也很缺乏。目的:为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人的早期干预心理健康支持建立一个有效的模型,并增加对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人获得、导航和参与心理健康支持的理解。方法:本研究是一个多方法理论主导的案例研究评估,分为三个不同的阶段:(1)通过对现有文献的元叙事回顾,建立一个理论框架来解释对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人的有效心理健康支持;(2)通过在线和离线服务映射,定位英国女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人目前的心理健康早期干预支持,以形成一种服务类型;(3)以理论为主导的案例研究评估,从第二阶段产生的服务类型中选择12个案例研究站点,建立适当质量的组成部分,早期干预女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋,变性人,酷儿/质疑者,以及年轻人的心理健康支持。结果:第一阶段产生了一个跨学科的理论框架,表明对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿/质疑者以及青少年的早期干预心理健康支持必须优先解决将青年、女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿/质疑者以及身份和心理健康问题边缘化的规范环境。第二阶段的地图绘制发现了111家服务机构,其中大部分位于英格兰的城市。国民保健服务缺乏主流的支持,专门针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人的需求。大多数女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者、变性人、酷儿/质疑者以及青年的心理健康支持是由志愿/社区组织提供的。第三阶段的案例研究评估发现,交叉的、青年权利的方法是为女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人提供早期干预心理健康支持的最合适的方法。青年权利应作为心理健康支持的基础,以解决女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人可能经历的多重边缘化、孤立和污名化问题,使他们能够对自己的身体和生活做出知情的独立决定,并维护安全自我表达的自由权利。我们制定的模型包含13项原则,这些原则对于提供精神卫生支持以及改善获得、参与和指导精神卫生服务是必要的。结论:在英国,以权利为基础的精神卫生服务提供方法并不突出。此外,在撰写本文时,女同性恋者、男同性恋者、双性恋者、跨性别者、酷儿/质疑者以及年轻人的人权正面临着积极的立法和政策攻击。本研究首次对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿/质疑者以及有常见心理健康问题的年轻人的早期干预心理健康支持进行了大规模的理论评估。由此产生的交叉,青年权利的方法为改善女同性恋,男同性恋,双性恋,变性人,酷儿/质疑,以及年轻人的心理健康提供了证据。对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者、酷儿/质疑者以及有心理健康问题的年轻人的早期干预心理健康支持实施交叉、青年权利方法的进一步研究是必要的。研究注册:本研究注册号为PROSPERO CRD42019135722。资助:该奖项由国家卫生和保健研究所(NIHR)卫生和社会保健提供研究项目(NIHR奖励编号:17/09/04)资助,全文发表在《卫生和社会保健提供研究》上;第十二卷,第47期有关进一步的奖励信息,请参阅美国国立卫生研究院资助和奖励网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信