Infection Rates in Open Hand Fractures: Can Surgical Treatment Be Delayed?

Mark Adam Tait, John White Bracey, Paulvalery Roulette, Daniel Robert Lewis
{"title":"Infection Rates in Open Hand Fractures: Can Surgical Treatment Be Delayed?","authors":"Mark Adam Tait, John White Bracey, Paulvalery Roulette, Daniel Robert Lewis","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors hypothesized that the infection rates of open hand fractures treated in a delayed manner would not be higher than those treated immediately. The authors performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated between January 2008 and July 2014 at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Delayed (> 24 hours) versus early (< 24 hours) surgical treatment groups were identified for comparison to determined infection rates. One hundred twenty-nine patients with open hand fractures were compared. Fifty-eight received delayed treatment (> 24 hours), and 71 received immediate surgical treatment (< 24 hours). When adjusted for the severity of injury, there were no significant differences on the rate of infection and rate of reoperation between washout and antibiotics in the emergency department versus immediate surgical treatment. There were no differences in infection rates or reoperation for nonunions with respect to surgical intervention timing. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(4):222-224, 2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"33 4","pages":"222-224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The authors hypothesized that the infection rates of open hand fractures treated in a delayed manner would not be higher than those treated immediately. The authors performed a retrospective chart review of patients treated between January 2008 and July 2014 at a Level 1 Trauma Center. Delayed (> 24 hours) versus early (< 24 hours) surgical treatment groups were identified for comparison to determined infection rates. One hundred twenty-nine patients with open hand fractures were compared. Fifty-eight received delayed treatment (> 24 hours), and 71 received immediate surgical treatment (< 24 hours). When adjusted for the severity of injury, there were no significant differences on the rate of infection and rate of reoperation between washout and antibiotics in the emergency department versus immediate surgical treatment. There were no differences in infection rates or reoperation for nonunions with respect to surgical intervention timing. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(4):222-224, 2024).

手部开放性骨折的感染率:手术治疗可以推迟吗?
作者假设,延迟治疗的手部骨折的感染率不会高于立即治疗的感染率。作者对2008年1月至2014年7月在一级创伤中心接受治疗的患者进行了回顾性图表回顾。确定延迟(bb0 24小时)和早期(< 24小时)手术治疗组,以比较确定的感染率。对129例手部开放性骨折患者进行了比较。58例延迟治疗(> 24小时),71例立即手术治疗(< 24小时)。当根据损伤严重程度进行调整时,在急诊科冲洗和抗生素治疗与立即手术治疗之间,感染率和再手术率没有显著差异。在手术干预时间方面,感染率和不愈合的再手术没有差异。[j] .外科骨科进展33(4):222-224,2024。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信