How Prostate Cancer Growth Patterns Impact Detection and Interreader Agreement on Multiparametric MRI.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Daniel Hausmann, N Rupp, B Kuzmanic, N Spielhofer, J Heimer, V Koelzer, M Nowak, C Gampp, L Hefermehl, R A Kubik-Huch, G Singer, I A Burger
{"title":"How Prostate Cancer Growth Patterns Impact Detection and Interreader Agreement on Multiparametric MRI.","authors":"Daniel Hausmann, N Rupp, B Kuzmanic, N Spielhofer, J Heimer, V Koelzer, M Nowak, C Gampp, L Hefermehl, R A Kubik-Huch, G Singer, I A Burger","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) substantially improves the detection of significant prostate carcinoma (PCa) compared to systematic biopsy. Nevertheless, mpMRI can overlook aggressive forms of PCa. Recent studies showed, that infiltrative growth (INF) has less restricted diffusion. This study aims to explore the impact of growth patterns on the detection of lesions.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed 52 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, with preoperative mpMRI. For each patient, one dominant lesion was identified on one whole-mount prostatectomy section. Two pathologists (P1, P2) independently classified the growth pattern whether as expansive (EXP) being defined with at least three 5mm² regions of interest consisting entirely of carcinoma without benign glands or else as infiltrative (INF). Two radiologists (R1, R2) independently classified selected lesions according to PI-RADSv2.1. based on pathological localization. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in correlation with matched histopathology slides. Interreader-agreement was evaluated using weighted Cohen's Kappa. The relationship between PI-RADS scores and pathological diagnoses was analyzed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pathologic lesion characterization regarding growth patterns achieved almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.88), so did PI-RADS classification of mpMRI (κ = 0.90). PI-RADS scores correlated significantly with EXP growth patterns. Average ADC values were lower for EXP lesions (0.83×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, CI: 0.72-0.94×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s) compared to INF lesions (0.97×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s, CI: 0.86-1.07×10<sup>-3</sup> mm<sup>2</sup>/s; p = 0.08). On T2 images, 8 of 28 (29%) INF lesions and 1 of 24 (4%) EXP lesions were not visible.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCa missed on mpMRI more frequently demonstrate INF growth patterns. Lesions with EXP growth patterns show lower ADC values and have higher PI-RADS scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.10.040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) substantially improves the detection of significant prostate carcinoma (PCa) compared to systematic biopsy. Nevertheless, mpMRI can overlook aggressive forms of PCa. Recent studies showed, that infiltrative growth (INF) has less restricted diffusion. This study aims to explore the impact of growth patterns on the detection of lesions.

Materials and methods: This retrospective study analyzed 52 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy, with preoperative mpMRI. For each patient, one dominant lesion was identified on one whole-mount prostatectomy section. Two pathologists (P1, P2) independently classified the growth pattern whether as expansive (EXP) being defined with at least three 5mm² regions of interest consisting entirely of carcinoma without benign glands or else as infiltrative (INF). Two radiologists (R1, R2) independently classified selected lesions according to PI-RADSv2.1. based on pathological localization. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured in correlation with matched histopathology slides. Interreader-agreement was evaluated using weighted Cohen's Kappa. The relationship between PI-RADS scores and pathological diagnoses was analyzed using logistic regression.

Results: Pathologic lesion characterization regarding growth patterns achieved almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.88), so did PI-RADS classification of mpMRI (κ = 0.90). PI-RADS scores correlated significantly with EXP growth patterns. Average ADC values were lower for EXP lesions (0.83×10-3 mm2/s, CI: 0.72-0.94×10-3 mm2/s) compared to INF lesions (0.97×10-3 mm2/s, CI: 0.86-1.07×10-3 mm2/s; p = 0.08). On T2 images, 8 of 28 (29%) INF lesions and 1 of 24 (4%) EXP lesions were not visible.

Conclusion: PCa missed on mpMRI more frequently demonstrate INF growth patterns. Lesions with EXP growth patterns show lower ADC values and have higher PI-RADS scores.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信