Exploratory Development of a Prognostic Model for Coronary Artery Disease Utilizing CT-FFR Derived Functional Duke Jeopardy Score.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Li-Na Ouyang, Rui Wang, Qian Wu, Pei Wang, Huai-Rong Zhang, Yuan Li, Li Zhu
{"title":"Exploratory Development of a Prognostic Model for Coronary Artery Disease Utilizing CT-FFR Derived Functional Duke Jeopardy Score.","authors":"Li-Na Ouyang, Rui Wang, Qian Wu, Pei Wang, Huai-Rong Zhang, Yuan Li, Li Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>To explore the prognostic value of the functional Duke Jeopardy Score based on CT-FFR(fDJS<sub>CTA</sub>) in assessing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 894 patients with stable CAD with stenosis ranging from 30% to 90%, who underwent CCTA were included in the study. Follow-up was performed to record MACE. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, prognostic analysis was performed and predictive model was constructed using univariable and multivariable Cox regressions and compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of different indicators. The receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve and clinical decision curve were used to evaluate the model's discrimination, calibration and clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median follow-up period was 33 (16-36) months, during which 167 cases (18.68%) of MACE occurred. Males accounted for 61.52% (550/894) of the cohort, with a median age of 61.92 years. The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that DJS<sub>CTA</sub> (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.17 ∼ 3.68) and fDJS<sub>CTA</sub> (HR: 4.68, 95% CI: 2.97 ∼ 7.38) were independent predictors of MACE. Using MACE as a standard, fDJS<sub>CTA</sub> improved the risk re-stratification ability of CT-FFR (NRI:0.993, P < 0.001) and the predictive ability of CT-FFR (IDI:0.101, P < 0.001) and DJS<sub>CTA</sub> (IDI:0.079, P < 0.001). The prediction model demonstrated high discrimination (training AUC: 0.84 [0.80-0.89]; validation AUC: 0.82 [0.75-0.89]), good calibration and clinical efficacy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fDJS<sub>CTA</sub> was the strongest predictor of MACE. The model constructed based on fDJS<sub>CTA</sub> has certain clinical utility in prognostic evaluation for CAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.11.038","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: To explore the prognostic value of the functional Duke Jeopardy Score based on CT-FFR(fDJSCTA) in assessing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

Materials and methods: A total of 894 patients with stable CAD with stenosis ranging from 30% to 90%, who underwent CCTA were included in the study. Follow-up was performed to record MACE. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets in a 7:3 ratio. In the training set, prognostic analysis was performed and predictive model was constructed using univariable and multivariable Cox regressions and compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) of different indicators. The receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve and clinical decision curve were used to evaluate the model's discrimination, calibration and clinical efficacy.

Results: The median follow-up period was 33 (16-36) months, during which 167 cases (18.68%) of MACE occurred. Males accounted for 61.52% (550/894) of the cohort, with a median age of 61.92 years. The multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that DJSCTA (HR: 2.07, 95% CI: 1.17 ∼ 3.68) and fDJSCTA (HR: 4.68, 95% CI: 2.97 ∼ 7.38) were independent predictors of MACE. Using MACE as a standard, fDJSCTA improved the risk re-stratification ability of CT-FFR (NRI:0.993, P < 0.001) and the predictive ability of CT-FFR (IDI:0.101, P < 0.001) and DJSCTA (IDI:0.079, P < 0.001). The prediction model demonstrated high discrimination (training AUC: 0.84 [0.80-0.89]; validation AUC: 0.82 [0.75-0.89]), good calibration and clinical efficacy.

Conclusion: The fDJSCTA was the strongest predictor of MACE. The model constructed based on fDJSCTA has certain clinical utility in prognostic evaluation for CAD.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信