Piloting of a surveillance system for acute respiratory diseases: COVID-19 monitoring using Sick Leave Certificates.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Inga Overesch, Ulrike Junius-Walker, Johanna Schneider, Mareike Wollenweber, Karina Usipbekova, Wiebke Böhne, Ina Holle, Johannes Dreesman, Elke Mertens, Sveja Eberhard
{"title":"Piloting of a surveillance system for acute respiratory diseases: COVID-19 monitoring using Sick Leave Certificates.","authors":"Inga Overesch, Ulrike Junius-Walker, Johanna Schneider, Mareike Wollenweber, Karina Usipbekova, Wiebke Böhne, Ina Holle, Johannes Dreesman, Elke Mertens, Sveja Eberhard","doi":"10.1055/a-2497-6449","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decreasing significance of official reporting figures, the Lower Saxony State Health Office developed and tested a new indicator: the \"7-day sick leave incidence\". Unlike previous surveillance indicators, it is intended for syndromic surveillance of COVID-19. This article explains the methodological development as well as its benefits, possible applications, and limitations.The indicator is based on the weekly number of sick leaves due to COVID-19 per 100,000 health insurance members entitled to sickness benefits (KGbM) of the AOK Lower Saxony (AOKN). The development of the indicator involved differentiating between initial and follow-up sick leaves, investigating fluctuations in the number of KGbM, analysing the doctors' assignments of ICD Codes U07.1! and U07.2!, and ensuring the timely availability of sick leave data.Initial and follow-up sick leaves were distinguished using a temporal algorithm. In 2022 and 2023, on average, 83.0% (s=5.4%) and 88.9% (s=2.3%) of all initial COVID-19-related sick notes were submitted on time by the end of the respective calendar week. Four out of 5 initial sick notes contained the doctors' ICD code U07.1! (lab-confirmed COVID-19). The number of KGbM proved to be stable (M=1.218.202, s=11.003). When comparing the new \"7-day sick leave incidence\" with the officially used \"7-day incidence rates\" during pandemic, trends were highly similar in 2022 (r=0.89), but diverged significantly in 2023 (r=0.26) due to declining diagnostic activities for the \"7-day incidence rates\".The new 7-day-sick-leave incidence is a good representation of the post-pandemic COVID-19 infection dynamics. The indicator uses routine data and is easy to establish. Limitations relate to possible changes in diagnostic procedures, doctors' coding behaviors and changing demands for sick leave.</p>","PeriodicalId":47653,"journal":{"name":"Gesundheitswesen","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gesundheitswesen","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2497-6449","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the end of the COVID-19 pandemic and the decreasing significance of official reporting figures, the Lower Saxony State Health Office developed and tested a new indicator: the "7-day sick leave incidence". Unlike previous surveillance indicators, it is intended for syndromic surveillance of COVID-19. This article explains the methodological development as well as its benefits, possible applications, and limitations.The indicator is based on the weekly number of sick leaves due to COVID-19 per 100,000 health insurance members entitled to sickness benefits (KGbM) of the AOK Lower Saxony (AOKN). The development of the indicator involved differentiating between initial and follow-up sick leaves, investigating fluctuations in the number of KGbM, analysing the doctors' assignments of ICD Codes U07.1! and U07.2!, and ensuring the timely availability of sick leave data.Initial and follow-up sick leaves were distinguished using a temporal algorithm. In 2022 and 2023, on average, 83.0% (s=5.4%) and 88.9% (s=2.3%) of all initial COVID-19-related sick notes were submitted on time by the end of the respective calendar week. Four out of 5 initial sick notes contained the doctors' ICD code U07.1! (lab-confirmed COVID-19). The number of KGbM proved to be stable (M=1.218.202, s=11.003). When comparing the new "7-day sick leave incidence" with the officially used "7-day incidence rates" during pandemic, trends were highly similar in 2022 (r=0.89), but diverged significantly in 2023 (r=0.26) due to declining diagnostic activities for the "7-day incidence rates".The new 7-day-sick-leave incidence is a good representation of the post-pandemic COVID-19 infection dynamics. The indicator uses routine data and is easy to establish. Limitations relate to possible changes in diagnostic procedures, doctors' coding behaviors and changing demands for sick leave.

试点监测急性呼吸系统疾病:通过残疾证明监测COVID-19。
随着COVID-19大流行的结束和官方报告数据的重要性下降,下萨克森州卫生局制定并测试了一项新指标:“7天病假发生率”。与以往的监测指标不同,该指标旨在对COVID-19进行综合征监测。本文解释了该方法的发展,以及它的优点、可能的应用和局限性。该指标是根据下萨克森州(AOKN)享有疾病津贴(KGbM)的每10万名健康保险会员每周因COVID-19而请病假的次数计算的。该指标的制定涉及区分初次和后续病假,调查KGbM数量的波动,分析ICD代码U07.1的医生分配!和U07.2 !,并确保及时提供病假数据。使用时间算法区分初始和后续病假。在2022年和2023年,平均有83.0% (s=5.4%)和88.9% (s=2.3%)的患者在各自日历周结束前按时提交了与covid -19相关的所有初次病假。最初的5个病假条中有4个包含医生的ICD代码U07.1!(实验室确诊COVID-19)。KGbM数量稳定(M=1.218.202, s=11.003)。当将新的“7天病假发生率”与大流行期间官方使用的“7天发病率”进行比较时,趋势在2022年非常相似(r=0.89),但在2023年由于“7天发病率”的诊断活动下降而出现显著差异(r=0.26)。新的7天病假发生率很好地反映了COVID-19大流行后的感染动态。该指标采用常规数据,易于建立。限制与诊断程序可能发生的变化、医生编码行为和病假需求的变化有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gesundheitswesen
Gesundheitswesen PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
18.20%
发文量
308
期刊介绍: The health service informs you comprehensively and up-to-date about the most important topics of the health care system. In addition to guidelines, overviews and comments, you will find current research results and contributions to CME-certified continuing education and training. The journal offers a scientific discussion forum and a platform for communications from professional societies. The content quality is ensured by a publisher body, the expert advisory board and other experts in the peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信