Genome-wide methylome-based molecular pathologies associated with depression and suicide.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 NEUROSCIENCES
Yogesh Dwivedi, Bhaskar Roy, Praveen Kumar Korla
{"title":"Genome-wide methylome-based molecular pathologies associated with depression and suicide.","authors":"Yogesh Dwivedi, Bhaskar Roy, Praveen Kumar Korla","doi":"10.1038/s41386-024-02040-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating disorder. Suicide attempts are 5-times higher in MDD patients than in the general population. Interestingly, not all MDD patients develop suicidal thoughts or complete suicide. Thus, it is important to study the risk factors that can distinguish suicidality among MDD patients. The present study examined if DNA methylation changes can distinguish suicidal behavior among depressed subjects. Genome-wide DNA methylation was examined in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide (MDD+S; n = 15), depressed non-suicide (MDD-S; n = 17), and nonpsychiatric control (C; n = 16) subjects using 850 K Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip. The significantly differentially methylated genes were used to determine the functional enrichment of genes for ontological clustering and pathway analysis. Based on the number of CpG content and their relative distribution from specific landmark regions of genes, 32,958 methylation sites were identified across 12,574 genes in C vs. MDD+/-S subjects, 30,852 methylation sites across 12,019 genes in C vs. MDD-S, 41,648 methylation sites across 13,941 genes in C vs. MDD+S, and 49,848 methylation sites across 15,015 genes in MDD-S vs. MDD+S groups. A comparison of methylation sites showed 33,129 unique methylation sites and 5451 genes in the MDD-S group compared to the MDD+S group. Functional analysis suggested oxytocin, GABA, VGFA, TNFA, and mTOR pathways associated with suicide in the MDD group. Altogether, our data show a distinct pattern of DNA methylation, the genomic distribution of differentially methylated sites, gene enrichment, and pathways in MDD suicide compared to non-suicide MDD subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":19143,"journal":{"name":"Neuropsychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuropsychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-024-02040-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a debilitating disorder. Suicide attempts are 5-times higher in MDD patients than in the general population. Interestingly, not all MDD patients develop suicidal thoughts or complete suicide. Thus, it is important to study the risk factors that can distinguish suicidality among MDD patients. The present study examined if DNA methylation changes can distinguish suicidal behavior among depressed subjects. Genome-wide DNA methylation was examined in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of depressed suicide (MDD+S; n = 15), depressed non-suicide (MDD-S; n = 17), and nonpsychiatric control (C; n = 16) subjects using 850 K Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip. The significantly differentially methylated genes were used to determine the functional enrichment of genes for ontological clustering and pathway analysis. Based on the number of CpG content and their relative distribution from specific landmark regions of genes, 32,958 methylation sites were identified across 12,574 genes in C vs. MDD+/-S subjects, 30,852 methylation sites across 12,019 genes in C vs. MDD-S, 41,648 methylation sites across 13,941 genes in C vs. MDD+S, and 49,848 methylation sites across 15,015 genes in MDD-S vs. MDD+S groups. A comparison of methylation sites showed 33,129 unique methylation sites and 5451 genes in the MDD-S group compared to the MDD+S group. Functional analysis suggested oxytocin, GABA, VGFA, TNFA, and mTOR pathways associated with suicide in the MDD group. Altogether, our data show a distinct pattern of DNA methylation, the genomic distribution of differentially methylated sites, gene enrichment, and pathways in MDD suicide compared to non-suicide MDD subjects.

与抑郁和自杀相关的全基因组甲基组分子病理学。
重度抑郁症(MDD)是一种衰弱性疾病。重度抑郁症患者的自杀企图是一般人群的5倍。有趣的是,并非所有重度抑郁症患者都会产生自杀念头或完全自杀。因此,研究区分重度抑郁症患者自杀倾向的危险因素具有重要意义。目前的研究调查了DNA甲基化变化是否可以区分抑郁症受试者的自杀行为。研究了抑郁症自杀者(MDD+S;n = 15),抑郁非自杀(MDD-S;n = 17),非精神病学对照组(C;n = 16)名受试者使用850 K Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip。显著差异甲基化基因被用来确定基因的功能富集,用于本体论聚类和途径分析。根据CpG含量的数量及其在特定基因里程碑区域的相对分布,在C组与MDD+/-S组的12,574个基因中鉴定出32,958个甲基化位点,在C组与MDD-S组的12,019个基因中鉴定出30,852个甲基化位点,在C组与MDD-S组的13,941个基因中鉴定出41,648个甲基化位点,在MDD-S组与MDD+S组的15,015个基因中鉴定出49,848个甲基化位点。甲基化位点比较显示,与MDD+S组相比,MDD-S组有33129个独特的甲基化位点和5451个基因。功能分析表明,在MDD组中,催产素、GABA、VGFA、TNFA和mTOR通路与自杀有关。总的来说,我们的数据显示了与非自杀性MDD受试者相比,MDD自杀者的DNA甲基化模式、差异甲基化位点的基因组分布、基因富集和途径的独特模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neuropsychopharmacology
Neuropsychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
240
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Neuropsychopharmacology is a reputable international scientific journal that serves as the official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology (ACNP). The journal's primary focus is on research that enhances our knowledge of the brain and behavior, with a particular emphasis on the molecular, cellular, physiological, and psychological aspects of substances that affect the central nervous system (CNS). It also aims to identify new molecular targets for the development of future drugs. The journal prioritizes original research reports, but it also welcomes mini-reviews and perspectives, which are often solicited by the editorial office. These types of articles provide valuable insights and syntheses of current research trends and future directions in the field of neuroscience and pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信