Rescue Sedation after 5 mg or 10 mg of Droperidol as the Initial Treatment for Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Jon B. Cole MD , Kathryn A. Glass PharmD , Quin T. Stevens MD , Amber R. LeBrun PharmD , Nicholas A. Beaupre PharmD , Brian E. Driver MD
{"title":"Rescue Sedation after 5 mg or 10 mg of Droperidol as the Initial Treatment for Acute Agitation in the Emergency Department","authors":"Jon B. Cole MD ,&nbsp;Kathryn A. Glass PharmD ,&nbsp;Quin T. Stevens MD ,&nbsp;Amber R. LeBrun PharmD ,&nbsp;Nicholas A. Beaupre PharmD ,&nbsp;Brian E. Driver MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Droperidol is used commonly to treat agitation in the emergency department (ED), however, data comparing doses are lacking.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 5 mg vs. 10 mg as initial droperidol dose for acute agitation in the ED.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-center, retrospective study examined adult ED patients receiving either 5 mg or 10 mg droperidol as the first agent to treat agitation from 2010 to 2023. The primary outcome was need for additional (rescue) sedation within 1 h of initial droperidol dose.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The authors identified 11,568 patients who received droperidol as their first medication (n = 8603 [74%] via intramuscular route); 10,293 received 5 mg and 1275 received 10 mg. Median age was 39 years (interquartile range 28–50 years); 8372 (72%) were male. Rescue sedation within 1 h was administered to 987 patients (9.6%) in the 5-mg group and 189 patients (14.8%) in the 10-mg group (difference 5.2%; 95% CI 3.2–7.3%). Additional sedation at any time was administered to 1776 patients (17.3%) in the 5-mg group and 318 (24.9%) in the 10-mg group (difference 7.7%; 95% CI 5.2–10.2%). Median length of stay was 471 min (interquartile range 347–611 min) in the 5 mg group and 487 min (interquartile range 364–641 min) in the 10-mg group (median difference 24 min; 95% CI 11–37 min).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In this large cohort, patients deemed appropriately treated with 5 mg of droperidol required less rescue sedation than patients determined to need 10 mg.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 73-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924002348","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Droperidol is used commonly to treat agitation in the emergency department (ED), however, data comparing doses are lacking.

Objective

The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of 5 mg vs. 10 mg as initial droperidol dose for acute agitation in the ED.

Methods

This single-center, retrospective study examined adult ED patients receiving either 5 mg or 10 mg droperidol as the first agent to treat agitation from 2010 to 2023. The primary outcome was need for additional (rescue) sedation within 1 h of initial droperidol dose.

Results

The authors identified 11,568 patients who received droperidol as their first medication (n = 8603 [74%] via intramuscular route); 10,293 received 5 mg and 1275 received 10 mg. Median age was 39 years (interquartile range 28–50 years); 8372 (72%) were male. Rescue sedation within 1 h was administered to 987 patients (9.6%) in the 5-mg group and 189 patients (14.8%) in the 10-mg group (difference 5.2%; 95% CI 3.2–7.3%). Additional sedation at any time was administered to 1776 patients (17.3%) in the 5-mg group and 318 (24.9%) in the 10-mg group (difference 7.7%; 95% CI 5.2–10.2%). Median length of stay was 471 min (interquartile range 347–611 min) in the 5 mg group and 487 min (interquartile range 364–641 min) in the 10-mg group (median difference 24 min; 95% CI 11–37 min).

Conclusions

In this large cohort, patients deemed appropriately treated with 5 mg of droperidol required less rescue sedation than patients determined to need 10 mg.
急诊科急性躁动的初始治疗:氟哌啶醇5mg或10mg后的抢救镇静。
背景:氟哌啶醇通常用于治疗急诊科(ED)的躁动,然而,缺乏比较剂量的数据。目的:本研究的目的是比较5mg和10mg氟哌啶醇作为ED急性躁动的初始剂量的有效性。方法:这项单中心、回顾性研究调查了2010年至2023年接受5mg或10mg氟哌啶醇作为第一种药物治疗躁动的成年ED患者。主要结果是需要在初始氟哌啶醇剂量1小时内进行额外(抢救)镇静。结果:作者确定了11,568例首次使用氟哌啶醇的患者(n = 8603例[74%]通过肌肉注射途径);10293人接受5毫克,1275人接受10毫克。中位年龄39岁(四分位数范围28-50岁);男性8372例(72%)。5mg组987例(9.6%)患者和10mg组189例(14.8%)患者在1 h内进行了抢救镇静(差异5.2%;95% ci 3.2-7.3%)。5mg组1776例(17.3%)患者和10mg组318例(24.9%)患者在任何时候给予额外镇静(差异7.7%;95% ci 5.2-10.2%)。5 mg组的中位停留时间为471 min(四分位数范围347-611 min), 10 mg组的中位停留时间为487 min(四分位数范围364-641 min)(中位差异24 min;95% CI 11-37 min)。结论:在这个大型队列中,被认为适当使用5mg氟哌啶醇治疗的患者比需要10mg氟哌啶醇治疗的患者需要更少的抢救镇静。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信