Patterns of failure after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer: outcomes in the immunotherapy era.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Neuro-Oncology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1007/s11060-024-04895-w
Alexander S Marwaha, Yun Liang, Matthew J Shepard, Alexander Yu, Stephen M Karlovits, Rodney E Wegner
{"title":"Patterns of failure after stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases from small cell lung cancer: outcomes in the immunotherapy era.","authors":"Alexander S Marwaha, Yun Liang, Matthew J Shepard, Alexander Yu, Stephen M Karlovits, Rodney E Wegner","doi":"10.1007/s11060-024-04895-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose/objective(s): </strong>Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is known to have high rates of development of brain metastases. Standard treatment has been whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) but the role for more focused treatment and hippocampal avoidance has arisen in the past decade. In addition, with possible penetration of the central nervous system by more modern immunotherapies, the risk of distant failure may be lower. As such, we reviewed patients at our institution treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to look at patterns, locations, and predictors of failure in the brain.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>A retrospective review and analysis of charts was done on 46 patients treated with SRS (no history of prior WBRT) for their brain metastases from SCLC. Multivariate analysis was used to determine significant prognostic factors influencing survival and local/distant failure. We tracked timing and type of immunotherapy, if any, as well as if patients failed in the hippocampus or required WBRT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 46 patients with 97 total brain metastases treated with SRS in this study. Median number of metastases was 2 (1-5). The median dose of radiation was 20 Gy (20-30) in 3 fractions (1-5) for all 97 tumors. 11 patients did not receive immunotherapy, whereas 35 patients had immunotherapy of some sort. Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 13 months, with a 12 month OS of 59% and 2 year OS of 30%. Cox regression did not reveal any significant predictors of OS, including age, sex, total volume, extracranial disease, KPS, immunotherapy, or number of metastases. 12 month and 24 month local control of disease was 95% and 80%, respectively. There were no significant predictors of local failure including volume, dose, or immunotherapy. 25 of the patients had distant brain failure, with a rate of distant failure of 38% and 64% for 6 and 12 months, respectively. Immunotherapy, number of metastases, total target volume, nor presence of extracranial disease was predictive of distant brain failure. WBRT free survival was also measured and found to be 73% at 1 year. There were no significant predictors for this measure. Lastly, five patients in this cohort showed failure in the hippocampus, where the rate of failure at 6 and 12 months was 16%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rates of distant brain failure in SCLC patients after SRS remain similar to those of NSCLC patients in the immunotherapy era. We did not show a decrease in distant failure rate based on immunotherapy use. The rate of hippocampal failure was quite low and should provide reassurance that SRS and techniques such as HA-IMRT can be reasonably used in these patients. Ongoing clinical trials will help provide more definitive answers in this arena.</p>","PeriodicalId":16425,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"177-183"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neuro-Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-024-04895-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/objective(s): Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is known to have high rates of development of brain metastases. Standard treatment has been whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) but the role for more focused treatment and hippocampal avoidance has arisen in the past decade. In addition, with possible penetration of the central nervous system by more modern immunotherapies, the risk of distant failure may be lower. As such, we reviewed patients at our institution treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to look at patterns, locations, and predictors of failure in the brain.

Materials/methods: A retrospective review and analysis of charts was done on 46 patients treated with SRS (no history of prior WBRT) for their brain metastases from SCLC. Multivariate analysis was used to determine significant prognostic factors influencing survival and local/distant failure. We tracked timing and type of immunotherapy, if any, as well as if patients failed in the hippocampus or required WBRT.

Results: There were 46 patients with 97 total brain metastases treated with SRS in this study. Median number of metastases was 2 (1-5). The median dose of radiation was 20 Gy (20-30) in 3 fractions (1-5) for all 97 tumors. 11 patients did not receive immunotherapy, whereas 35 patients had immunotherapy of some sort. Median overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 13 months, with a 12 month OS of 59% and 2 year OS of 30%. Cox regression did not reveal any significant predictors of OS, including age, sex, total volume, extracranial disease, KPS, immunotherapy, or number of metastases. 12 month and 24 month local control of disease was 95% and 80%, respectively. There were no significant predictors of local failure including volume, dose, or immunotherapy. 25 of the patients had distant brain failure, with a rate of distant failure of 38% and 64% for 6 and 12 months, respectively. Immunotherapy, number of metastases, total target volume, nor presence of extracranial disease was predictive of distant brain failure. WBRT free survival was also measured and found to be 73% at 1 year. There were no significant predictors for this measure. Lastly, five patients in this cohort showed failure in the hippocampus, where the rate of failure at 6 and 12 months was 16%.

Conclusion: Rates of distant brain failure in SCLC patients after SRS remain similar to those of NSCLC patients in the immunotherapy era. We did not show a decrease in distant failure rate based on immunotherapy use. The rate of hippocampal failure was quite low and should provide reassurance that SRS and techniques such as HA-IMRT can be reasonably used in these patients. Ongoing clinical trials will help provide more definitive answers in this arena.

立体定向放射治疗小细胞肺癌脑转移后的失败模式:免疫治疗时代的结果。
目的/目的:众所周知,小细胞肺癌(SCLC)具有很高的脑转移率。标准的治疗方法是全脑放射治疗(WBRT),但在过去的十年中,更集中的治疗和海马回避的作用已经出现。此外,随着更现代的免疫疗法可能渗透到中枢神经系统,远处衰竭的风险可能会降低。因此,我们回顾了我院接受立体定向放射外科(SRS)治疗的患者,以观察脑衰竭的模式、位置和预测因素。材料/方法:对46例SCLC脑转移患者进行SRS治疗(无WBRT病史)的回顾性回顾和图表分析。多变量分析用于确定影响生存和局部/远处失败的重要预后因素。我们跟踪了免疫治疗的时间和类型,如果有的话,以及患者是否在海马体中失败或需要WBRT。结果:本组共46例97例脑转移瘤采用SRS治疗。中位转移数为2例(1-5)。97例肿瘤中位放射剂量为20 Gy(20 ~ 30),分3段(1 ~ 5)。11名患者未接受免疫治疗,而35名患者接受了某种免疫治疗。整个队列的中位总生存期(OS)为13个月,其中12个月OS为59%,2年OS为30%。Cox回归未显示任何显著的OS预测因子,包括年龄、性别、总体积、颅外疾病、KPS、免疫治疗或转移数量。12个月和24个月疾病局部控制率分别为95%和80%。没有显著的局部衰竭预测因素,包括体积、剂量或免疫治疗。25例患者发生远端脑衰竭,6个月和12个月的远端脑衰竭率分别为38%和64%。免疫治疗、转移瘤数量、总靶体积、不存在颅外疾病均可预测远处性脑衰竭。也测量了无WBRT的生存率,发现1年时为73%。这项测量没有显著的预测因子。最后,该队列中有5名患者在海马体中表现出失败,在6个月和12个月时的失败率为16%。结论:SCLC患者SRS后远端脑衰竭的发生率与免疫治疗时代的NSCLC患者相似。我们没有显示基于免疫疗法使用的远端失败率降低。海马功能衰竭的发生率很低,应该为SRS和HA-IMRT等技术在这些患者中可以合理使用提供保证。正在进行的临床试验将有助于在这个领域提供更明确的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Journal of Neuro-Oncology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
277
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neuro-Oncology is a multi-disciplinary journal encompassing basic, applied, and clinical investigations in all research areas as they relate to cancer and the central nervous system. It provides a single forum for communication among neurologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists, medical oncologists, neuropathologists, neurodiagnosticians, and laboratory-based oncologists conducting relevant research. The Journal of Neuro-Oncology does not seek to isolate the field, but rather to focus the efforts of many disciplines in one publication through a format which pulls together these diverse interests. More than any other field of oncology, cancer of the central nervous system requires multi-disciplinary approaches. To alleviate having to scan dozens of journals of cell biology, pathology, laboratory and clinical endeavours, JNO is a periodical in which current, high-quality, relevant research in all aspects of neuro-oncology may be found.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信