Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Breastfeeding Motivation Scale (BMS). An approach to maternal mental health through psychological factors

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Cecilia Peñacoba-Puente , Octavio Luque-Reca , Lucía Agudo-Díaz , Miri Kestler-Peleg
{"title":"Reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Breastfeeding Motivation Scale (BMS). An approach to maternal mental health through psychological factors","authors":"Cecilia Peñacoba-Puente ,&nbsp;Octavio Luque-Reca ,&nbsp;Lucía Agudo-Díaz ,&nbsp;Miri Kestler-Peleg","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The decision to breastfeed can be complex due to the significant benefits of breastfeeding and the various barriers that mothers have to face. In this context, it is important to have adequate instruments that provide insight into a mother's motives for breastfeeding.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Given the absence of instruments in this language, this study focuses on translating and validating the Breastfeeding Motivation Scale (BMS) in Spanish mothers.</div></div><div><h3>Method</h3><div>After cultural adaptation and an item clarity assessment with a pilot sample (n = 28), exploratory factor analysis was conducted with a preliminary sample (n = 118). The main study involved 193 Spanish primiparous mothers, aged 24-48 (<em>M</em> = 34.5; <em>SD</em> = 4.2), recruited within two months postpartum, where confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, group comparisons, and validity measures were explored.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings (<span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mi>χ</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msup><mo>=</mo><mn>358.925</mn></mrow></math></span>, <em>df</em>=183, <em>p</em>&lt;0.001, CFI=0.971, TLI=0.967, SRMR=0.079, and RMSEA=0.071 [90% CI: 0.060-0.081]) supported the existence of four motivational factors for breastfeeding: i) external and identified, ii) intrinsic, iii) integrated, and iv) introjected motivation. The four factors of the scale showed excellent internal consistency (ω<sub>o</sub> ranging from 0.77 to 0.92), as well as good convergent and discriminant validity regarding theoretically-related variables (breastfeeding self-efficacy, positive attitude towards breastfeeding, and postpartum depression). Additionally, the scale showed incremental validity with respect to breastfeeding self-efficacy, but not regarding postpartum depression.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>The BMS evidenced good psychometric properties in Spanish primiparous mothers. The findings are discussed in the context of Ryan and Deci's self-determination theory, also reviewing the study's limitations and implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104260"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824003437","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The decision to breastfeed can be complex due to the significant benefits of breastfeeding and the various barriers that mothers have to face. In this context, it is important to have adequate instruments that provide insight into a mother's motives for breastfeeding.

Aim

Given the absence of instruments in this language, this study focuses on translating and validating the Breastfeeding Motivation Scale (BMS) in Spanish mothers.

Method

After cultural adaptation and an item clarity assessment with a pilot sample (n = 28), exploratory factor analysis was conducted with a preliminary sample (n = 118). The main study involved 193 Spanish primiparous mothers, aged 24-48 (M = 34.5; SD = 4.2), recruited within two months postpartum, where confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, group comparisons, and validity measures were explored.

Results

The findings (χ2=358.925, df=183, p<0.001, CFI=0.971, TLI=0.967, SRMR=0.079, and RMSEA=0.071 [90% CI: 0.060-0.081]) supported the existence of four motivational factors for breastfeeding: i) external and identified, ii) intrinsic, iii) integrated, and iv) introjected motivation. The four factors of the scale showed excellent internal consistency (ωo ranging from 0.77 to 0.92), as well as good convergent and discriminant validity regarding theoretically-related variables (breastfeeding self-efficacy, positive attitude towards breastfeeding, and postpartum depression). Additionally, the scale showed incremental validity with respect to breastfeeding self-efficacy, but not regarding postpartum depression.

Discussion

The BMS evidenced good psychometric properties in Spanish primiparous mothers. The findings are discussed in the context of Ryan and Deci's self-determination theory, also reviewing the study's limitations and implications.
西班牙版母乳喂养动机量表(BMS)的信度和效度。从心理因素看孕产妇心理健康。
背景:由于母乳喂养的显著好处和母亲必须面对的各种障碍,决定母乳喂养可能是复杂的。在这种情况下,重要的是要有足够的工具来深入了解母亲母乳喂养的动机。目的:考虑到该语言缺乏工具,本研究着重于翻译和验证西班牙语母亲的母乳喂养动机量表(BMS)。方法:采用先导样本(n = 28)进行文化适应和项目清晰度评估后,采用初步样本(n = 118)进行探索性因子分析。主要研究涉及193名西班牙初产母亲,年龄24-48岁(M = 34.5;SD = 4.2),在产后两个月内招募,进行验证性因素分析、内部一致性、组间比较和效度测量。结果:研究结果(χ2=358.925, df=183, po范围为0.77 ~ 0.92),对母乳喂养自我效能感、母乳喂养积极态度和产后抑郁的理论相关变量具有较好的收敛效度和判别效度。此外,该量表在母乳喂养自我效能感方面呈递增效度,但在产后抑郁方面无递增效度。讨论:BMS在西班牙初产母亲中证明了良好的心理测量特性。研究结果在Ryan和Deci的自我决定理论的背景下进行了讨论,也回顾了研究的局限性和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信