Routine pulmonary lung function tests: Interpretative strategies and challenges.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Balsam Barkous, Chaima Briki, Saba Boubakri, Mariem Abdesslem, Narjès Ben Abbes, Wième Ben Hmid, Helmi Ben Saad
{"title":"Routine pulmonary lung function tests: Interpretative strategies and challenges.","authors":"Balsam Barkous, Chaima Briki, Saba Boubakri, Mariem Abdesslem, Narjès Ben Abbes, Wième Ben Hmid, Helmi Ben Saad","doi":"10.1177/14799731241307252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction:</b> The diagnosis and management of common chronic respiratory diseases depend on various parameters obtained from pulmonary function tests (PFTs), such as spirometry, plethysmography, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO). These tests are interpreted following guidelines established by reputable scientific societies like the European Respiratory Society and the American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS). <b>Aim and Methods:</b> This review aimed to offer a comprehensive framework for interpreting PFTs, incorporating the latest ERS/ATS update (i.e.; 2022), and to briefly explore some complex cases to shed light on their implications for understanding PFTs. <b>Results:</b> The ERS/ATS update outlines a systematic approach to interpreting PFT results, which involves several steps. Initially, results are compared to those of a healthy reference population to determine normal, low, or high parameters. Then, potential ventilatory impairments (VIs), such as obstructive or restrictive VIs, are identified, which could indicate specific chronic respiratory or extra-respiratory diseases. The severity of identified VIs or reductions in DLCO is then assessed. If bronchodilator testing is performed, its response is evaluated. Lastly, any significant changes in PFT parameters over time are noted by comparing current results with previous ones, if available. Despite the clarity provided by the ERS/ATS update, certain uncertainties persist and require clarification, such as the identification of new patterns (e.g.; non-obstructive abnormal spirometry, isolated low forced expiratory volume in 1 s), and classifications of mixed VI or lung hyperinflation in terms of functional severity. <b>Conclusion:</b> This review is a comprehensive framework for interpreting PFTs. Since some issues pose uncertainty in clinical practice, it would be beneficial to the ERS/ATS to reconcile some inconsistencies and provide clearer guidance on different classifications and VIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":10217,"journal":{"name":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","volume":"21 ","pages":"14799731241307252"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11625406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chronic Respiratory Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14799731241307252","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnosis and management of common chronic respiratory diseases depend on various parameters obtained from pulmonary function tests (PFTs), such as spirometry, plethysmography, and carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO). These tests are interpreted following guidelines established by reputable scientific societies like the European Respiratory Society and the American Thoracic Society (ERS/ATS). Aim and Methods: This review aimed to offer a comprehensive framework for interpreting PFTs, incorporating the latest ERS/ATS update (i.e.; 2022), and to briefly explore some complex cases to shed light on their implications for understanding PFTs. Results: The ERS/ATS update outlines a systematic approach to interpreting PFT results, which involves several steps. Initially, results are compared to those of a healthy reference population to determine normal, low, or high parameters. Then, potential ventilatory impairments (VIs), such as obstructive or restrictive VIs, are identified, which could indicate specific chronic respiratory or extra-respiratory diseases. The severity of identified VIs or reductions in DLCO is then assessed. If bronchodilator testing is performed, its response is evaluated. Lastly, any significant changes in PFT parameters over time are noted by comparing current results with previous ones, if available. Despite the clarity provided by the ERS/ATS update, certain uncertainties persist and require clarification, such as the identification of new patterns (e.g.; non-obstructive abnormal spirometry, isolated low forced expiratory volume in 1 s), and classifications of mixed VI or lung hyperinflation in terms of functional severity. Conclusion: This review is a comprehensive framework for interpreting PFTs. Since some issues pose uncertainty in clinical practice, it would be beneficial to the ERS/ATS to reconcile some inconsistencies and provide clearer guidance on different classifications and VIs.

常规肺功能检查:解释策略和挑战。
简介:常见慢性呼吸系统疾病的诊断和治疗依赖于肺功能试验(pft)获得的各种参数,如肺活量测定法、体积脉搏图和一氧化碳扩散能力(DLCO)。这些测试是根据欧洲呼吸学会和美国胸科学会(ERS/ATS)等著名科学学会制定的指导方针进行解释的。目的和方法:本综述旨在提供一个全面的框架来解释PFTs,包括最新的ERS/ATS更新(即;2022),并简要探讨一些复杂的案例,以阐明它们对理解pft的影响。结果:ERS/ATS更新概述了解释PFT结果的系统方法,其中涉及几个步骤。最初,将结果与健康参考人群的结果进行比较,以确定正常、低或高参数。然后,识别潜在的通气障碍(VIs),如阻塞性或限制性VIs,这可能表明特定的慢性呼吸或呼吸外疾病。然后评估已确定的VIs或DLCO减少的严重程度。如果进行支气管扩张剂试验,则评估其反应。最后,通过将当前结果与以前的结果(如果有的话)进行比较,可以注意到PFT参数随时间的任何显著变化。尽管ERS/ATS更新提供了明确的内容,但某些不确定性仍然存在,需要澄清,例如确定新的模式(例如;非阻塞性肺活量异常,孤立的1 s内低用力呼气量,以及根据功能严重程度对混合性肺活量或肺恶性膨胀进行分类。结论:本综述为解释PFTs提供了一个全面的框架。由于一些问题在临床实践中存在不确定性,因此,对于不同的分类和VIs提供更清晰的指导,将有利于ERS/ATS协调一些不一致之处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chronic Respiratory Disease
Chronic Respiratory Disease RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
7.30%
发文量
47
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Chronic Respiratory Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, scholarly journal, created in response to the rising incidence of chronic respiratory diseases worldwide. It publishes high quality research papers and original articles that have immediate relevance to clinical practice and its multi-disciplinary perspective reflects the nature of modern treatment. The journal provides a high quality, multi-disciplinary focus for the publication of original papers, reviews and commentary in the broad area of chronic respiratory disease, particularly its treatment and management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信