Barriers to early childhood education for Black families and calls for equitable solutions from a qualitative study using peer researchers and an antiracist lens

IF 3.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Kristen A Copeland , Amy King , Julietta Ladipo , Desiré Bennett , Alexis Amsterdam , Cynthia White , Heather Gerker , J'Mag Karbeah
{"title":"Barriers to early childhood education for Black families and calls for equitable solutions from a qualitative study using peer researchers and an antiracist lens","authors":"Kristen A Copeland ,&nbsp;Amy King ,&nbsp;Julietta Ladipo ,&nbsp;Desiré Bennett ,&nbsp;Alexis Amsterdam ,&nbsp;Cynthia White ,&nbsp;Heather Gerker ,&nbsp;J'Mag Karbeah","doi":"10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.12.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Racial disparities in early care education (ECE) utilization and quality continue to persist in the United States and have considerable implications throughout the life course. This study applied a population health framework and an antiracist lens to conduct peer-led qualitative interviews (n = 20) and facilitate community synthesis and design sessions (n = 6) with parents, ECE staff, and thought leaders. The goal was to better understand: (1) the barriers to enrollment faced by Black families seeking high-quality ECE experiences and (2) potential policy and system interventions to increase access and equity. Three key themes emerged: 1) idealized notions of what Black parents wanted for their children in ECE settings diverged from their actual experiences; 2) there were significant racialized administrative burdens or hoops to jump through to access ECE; and 3) participants cited positive and negative experiences with home-visiting programs to foster child development. Black participants expressed reservations about engaging with these programs based partly on previous discriminatory experiences and/or negative first- or second-hand experiences with state-mandated home visits from social services. The findings from this study make a significant contribution to the literature on barriers to high-quality ECE programs that Black families experience and community-identified policy solutions to address disparities. The system and policy solutions to these racial disparities in ECE enrollment cocreated by parents, ECE staff and the research team are discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48348,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","volume":"69 ","pages":"Pages S26-S38"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Research Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885200623001758","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Racial disparities in early care education (ECE) utilization and quality continue to persist in the United States and have considerable implications throughout the life course. This study applied a population health framework and an antiracist lens to conduct peer-led qualitative interviews (n = 20) and facilitate community synthesis and design sessions (n = 6) with parents, ECE staff, and thought leaders. The goal was to better understand: (1) the barriers to enrollment faced by Black families seeking high-quality ECE experiences and (2) potential policy and system interventions to increase access and equity. Three key themes emerged: 1) idealized notions of what Black parents wanted for their children in ECE settings diverged from their actual experiences; 2) there were significant racialized administrative burdens or hoops to jump through to access ECE; and 3) participants cited positive and negative experiences with home-visiting programs to foster child development. Black participants expressed reservations about engaging with these programs based partly on previous discriminatory experiences and/or negative first- or second-hand experiences with state-mandated home visits from social services. The findings from this study make a significant contribution to the literature on barriers to high-quality ECE programs that Black families experience and community-identified policy solutions to address disparities. The system and policy solutions to these racial disparities in ECE enrollment cocreated by parents, ECE staff and the research team are discussed.
黑人家庭早期儿童教育的障碍,以及来自同行研究人员和反种族主义镜头的定性研究的公平解决方案的呼吁
在美国,早期保育教育(ECE)的利用和质量方面的种族差异继续存在,并在整个生命过程中产生重大影响。本研究采用人口健康框架和反种族主义视角,开展了同行主导的定性访谈(n = 20),并促进了与家长、欧洲经委会工作人员和思想领袖的社区综合和设计会议(n = 6)。目标是更好地理解:(1)寻求高质量ECE经验的黑人家庭面临的入学障碍;(2)增加准入和公平的潜在政策和系统干预措施。出现了三个关键主题:1)黑人父母对孩子在欧洲经委会环境中的期望的理想化概念与他们的实际经历不符;2)进入欧洲经委会需要跨越重大的种族行政负担或障碍;3)参与者列举了促进儿童发展的家访项目的积极和消极经验。黑人参与者对参与这些项目持保留态度,部分原因是之前的歧视经历和/或对国家规定的社会服务机构家访的负面第一手或二手经验。本研究的结果对黑人家庭经历的高质量ECE项目的障碍和社区确定的解决差距的政策解决方案的文献做出了重大贡献。本文讨论了由家长、ECE工作人员和研究团队共同制定的针对ECE招生中种族差异的制度和政策解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
8.10%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: For over twenty years, Early Childhood Research Quarterly (ECRQ) has influenced the field of early childhood education and development through the publication of empirical research that meets the highest standards of scholarly and practical significance. ECRQ publishes predominantly empirical research (quantitative or qualitative methods) on issues of interest to early childhood development, theory, and educational practice (Birth through 8 years of age). The journal also occasionally publishes practitioner and/or policy perspectives, book reviews, and significant reviews of research. As an applied journal, we are interested in work that has social, policy, and educational relevance and implications and work that strengthens links between research and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信