QuIDS: A Quantum Support Vector machine-based Intrusion Detection System for IoT networks

IF 7.7 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE
Rakesh Kumar, Mayank Swarnkar
{"title":"QuIDS: A Quantum Support Vector machine-based Intrusion Detection System for IoT networks","authors":"Rakesh Kumar, Mayank Swarnkar","doi":"10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing popularity of IoT, there has been a noticeable surge in security breaches associated with vulnerable IoT devices. To identify and counter such attacks. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are deployed. However, these IoT devices use device-specific application layer protocols like MQTT and CoAP, which pose an additional burden to the traditional IDS. Several Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) based IDS are developed to detect malicious IoT network traffic. However, in recent times, a variety of IoT devices have been available on the market, resulting in the frequent installation and uninstallation of IoT devices based on users’ needs. Moreover, ML and DL-based IDS must train with sufficient device-specific attack training data for each IoT device, consuming a noticeable amount of training time. To solve these problems, we propose QuIDS, which utilizes a Quantum Support Vector Classifier to classify attacks in an IoT network. QuIDS requires very little training data compared to ML or DL to train and accurately identify attacks in the IoT network. QuIDS extracts eight flow-level features from IoT network traffic and utilizes them over four quantum bits for training. We experimented with QuIDS on two publicly available datasets and found the average recall rate, precision, and f1-score of the QuIDS as 91.1%, 84.3%, and 86.4%, respectively. Moreover, comparing QuIDS with the ML and DL methods, we found that QuIDS outperformed by 37.7%, 24.4.6%, and 36.9% more average recall and precision rates than the ML and DL methods, respectively.","PeriodicalId":54784,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Network and Computer Applications","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Network and Computer Applications","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2024.104072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, HARDWARE & ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing popularity of IoT, there has been a noticeable surge in security breaches associated with vulnerable IoT devices. To identify and counter such attacks. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS) are deployed. However, these IoT devices use device-specific application layer protocols like MQTT and CoAP, which pose an additional burden to the traditional IDS. Several Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning (DL) based IDS are developed to detect malicious IoT network traffic. However, in recent times, a variety of IoT devices have been available on the market, resulting in the frequent installation and uninstallation of IoT devices based on users’ needs. Moreover, ML and DL-based IDS must train with sufficient device-specific attack training data for each IoT device, consuming a noticeable amount of training time. To solve these problems, we propose QuIDS, which utilizes a Quantum Support Vector Classifier to classify attacks in an IoT network. QuIDS requires very little training data compared to ML or DL to train and accurately identify attacks in the IoT network. QuIDS extracts eight flow-level features from IoT network traffic and utilizes them over four quantum bits for training. We experimented with QuIDS on two publicly available datasets and found the average recall rate, precision, and f1-score of the QuIDS as 91.1%, 84.3%, and 86.4%, respectively. Moreover, comparing QuIDS with the ML and DL methods, we found that QuIDS outperformed by 37.7%, 24.4.6%, and 36.9% more average recall and precision rates than the ML and DL methods, respectively.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
Journal of Network and Computer Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
21.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
142
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Network and Computer Applications welcomes research contributions, surveys, and notes in all areas relating to computer networks and applications thereof. Sample topics include new design techniques, interesting or novel applications, components or standards; computer networks with tools such as WWW; emerging standards for internet protocols; Wireless networks; Mobile Computing; emerging computing models such as cloud computing, grid computing; applications of networked systems for remote collaboration and telemedicine, etc. The journal is abstracted and indexed in Scopus, Engineering Index, Web of Science, Science Citation Index Expanded and INSPEC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信