{"title":"Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior and Unethical Pro-Family Behavior: The Roles of Work-to-Family Conflict and Work-Home Segmentation Preference.","authors":"Baofang Zhang, Suosuo Jia, Lingling Lu, Mengmeng Chang","doi":"10.1080/00223980.2024.2430714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Unethical pro-organizational behavior has attracted widespread attention from practitioners and scholars. Although most previous studies have explored its antecedents, less is known about its consequences. The study focuses on analyzing and testing the mechanism and boundary conditions of the influence of employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior on unethical pro-family behavior. To examine our conceptual model, we conducted an experiment study (Study 1) and a two-wave filed study (Study 2) in China. Hierarchical multiple regression and Bootstrap analyses were used to test our hypotheses. The results indicate that employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior is positively related to unethical pro-family behavior, and that employees' work-to-family conflict mediates the relationship between unethical pro-organizational behavior and unethical pro-family behavior. In addition, the relationship between unethical pro-organizational behavior and work-to-family conflict, as well as the indirect influence of unethical pro-organizational behavior on unethical pro-family behavior through work-to-family conflict, are moderated by employees' work-home segmentation preference. These findings suggest the significance of adopting a conservation of resources perspective in comprehending the detrimental effects of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Furthermore, they offer practical insights for managers to formulate specific ethical rules and punishment systems, effectively curbing employees' unethical behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":48218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-24"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2024.2430714","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Unethical pro-organizational behavior has attracted widespread attention from practitioners and scholars. Although most previous studies have explored its antecedents, less is known about its consequences. The study focuses on analyzing and testing the mechanism and boundary conditions of the influence of employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior on unethical pro-family behavior. To examine our conceptual model, we conducted an experiment study (Study 1) and a two-wave filed study (Study 2) in China. Hierarchical multiple regression and Bootstrap analyses were used to test our hypotheses. The results indicate that employees' unethical pro-organizational behavior is positively related to unethical pro-family behavior, and that employees' work-to-family conflict mediates the relationship between unethical pro-organizational behavior and unethical pro-family behavior. In addition, the relationship between unethical pro-organizational behavior and work-to-family conflict, as well as the indirect influence of unethical pro-organizational behavior on unethical pro-family behavior through work-to-family conflict, are moderated by employees' work-home segmentation preference. These findings suggest the significance of adopting a conservation of resources perspective in comprehending the detrimental effects of unethical pro-organizational behavior. Furthermore, they offer practical insights for managers to formulate specific ethical rules and punishment systems, effectively curbing employees' unethical behavior.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychology is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes empirical research and theoretical articles in applied areas of psychology, including: Behavioral Psychology Clinical Psychology Cognitive Psychology Counseling Psychology Cultural Psychology Economic Psychology Educational Psychology Environmental Psychology Ethics in Psychology Family Psychology and Couples Psychology Forensic Psychology Health Psychology Industrial and Personnel Psychology Managerial and Leadership Psychology Measurement/Assessment Professional Practice Psychology of Religion Psychotherapy School Psychology Social Psychology Sport Psychology Work, Industrial and Organizational Psychology