Cost-effectiveness of a Low-cost Educational Messaging and Prescription-fill Reminder Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence Among Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disability and Hypertension.
Brian Chen, Suzanne McDermott, Deborah Salzberg, Wanfang Zhang, James W Hardin
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of a Low-cost Educational Messaging and Prescription-fill Reminder Intervention to Improve Medication Adherence Among Individuals With Intellectual and Developmental Disability and Hypertension.","authors":"Brian Chen, Suzanne McDermott, Deborah Salzberg, Wanfang Zhang, James W Hardin","doi":"10.1097/MLR.0000000000001946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) have a similar prevalence of hypertension as the general population, but a higher rate of medication nonadherence at 50% compared with the average of 30%.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the cost-effectiveness of educational messaging and prescription-fill reminders to adults with IDD and hypertension and their helpers among Medicaid members in a randomized control trial.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>The authors calculated net cost savings by subtracting per-participant intervention costs from differences in spending between preintervention/postintervention cases versus controls. Using bootstrap samples, they assessed the probability of positive cost savings. They used quantile and logistic regression to examine which members contributed to the cost savings and to identify future high-cost members at baseline.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Four hundred twelve members with IDD and their helpers were recruited from the South Carolina Medicaid agency in 2018.</p><p><strong>Measures: </strong>Intervention costs were determined using labor and communication costs. Health expenditures were obtained from South Carolina's all-payer claims database, using actual Medicaid expenditures and total all-payer expenditures estimated with cost-to-charge ratios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The intervention, which cost $26.10 per member, saved $1008.02 in all-payer spending and $1126.42 in Medicaid payments per member, respectively, with 78% and 91% confidence. Cost savings occurred among members above the 85th percentile of spending, and those using the emergency department or inpatient services at least twice at baseline were predicted to be future high-cost members.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention is cost-saving, and insurers can prospectively identify and target members who will likely benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":18364,"journal":{"name":"Medical Care","volume":"63 1 Suppl 1","pages":"S15-S24"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617081/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001946","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDDs) have a similar prevalence of hypertension as the general population, but a higher rate of medication nonadherence at 50% compared with the average of 30%.
Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of educational messaging and prescription-fill reminders to adults with IDD and hypertension and their helpers among Medicaid members in a randomized control trial.
Research design: The authors calculated net cost savings by subtracting per-participant intervention costs from differences in spending between preintervention/postintervention cases versus controls. Using bootstrap samples, they assessed the probability of positive cost savings. They used quantile and logistic regression to examine which members contributed to the cost savings and to identify future high-cost members at baseline.
Subjects: Four hundred twelve members with IDD and their helpers were recruited from the South Carolina Medicaid agency in 2018.
Measures: Intervention costs were determined using labor and communication costs. Health expenditures were obtained from South Carolina's all-payer claims database, using actual Medicaid expenditures and total all-payer expenditures estimated with cost-to-charge ratios.
Results: The intervention, which cost $26.10 per member, saved $1008.02 in all-payer spending and $1126.42 in Medicaid payments per member, respectively, with 78% and 91% confidence. Cost savings occurred among members above the 85th percentile of spending, and those using the emergency department or inpatient services at least twice at baseline were predicted to be future high-cost members.
Conclusions: The intervention is cost-saving, and insurers can prospectively identify and target members who will likely benefit.
期刊介绍:
Rated as one of the top ten journals in healthcare administration, Medical Care is devoted to all aspects of the administration and delivery of healthcare. This scholarly journal publishes original, peer-reviewed papers documenting the most current developments in the rapidly changing field of healthcare. This timely journal reports on the findings of original investigations into issues related to the research, planning, organization, financing, provision, and evaluation of health services.