"Room of Horrors": A Proof-of-Concept Simulation Model for Error Reduction Training in the Emergency Department.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003310
Tali Capua, Maya Arnon, Moriya Rozenberg, Efrat Perets, Nir Samuel, Dana Adatto Levy, Nadav Elmaliach, Hagit Padova, Ayelet Rimon
{"title":"\"Room of Horrors\": A Proof-of-Concept Simulation Model for Error Reduction Training in the Emergency Department.","authors":"Tali Capua, Maya Arnon, Moriya Rozenberg, Efrat Perets, Nir Samuel, Dana Adatto Levy, Nadav Elmaliach, Hagit Padova, Ayelet Rimon","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This pilot study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a \"room of horrors\" (RoH) simulation in identifying patient safety threats in a pediatric emergency department (PED) and to evaluate health care workers' (HCWs') perceptions of the experience.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed an RoH simulation featuring 25 potential safety hazards derived from actual PED incidents and \"never events.\" The teams of physicians and nurses who participated in the simulation identified as many hazards as they could within a 10-minute window followed by a debriefing session during which errors were corrected and missed hazards were pointed out. The participants' perceptions were measured on a 5-point Likert scale of a questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty sessions that included a total of 45 participants were conducted. The teams identified an average of 23 of 25 safety threats, yielding a mean detection rate of 86% for electronic medical record errors, 95% for physical space errors, and 97% for communication errors. The simulation received high ratings for overall positive experience (4.88/5) and impact on daily activities (4.68/5).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The RoH simulation experience was effective in evaluating the level of retention of earlier training and the ability of multidisciplinary teams to correctly identify major safety threats in a PED setting. The participants found the experience valuable and engaging. Future research should focus on other means by which the retention of learned skills can be reinforced and new safety threats can be identified with a high level of alertness.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"172-175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003310","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This pilot study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a "room of horrors" (RoH) simulation in identifying patient safety threats in a pediatric emergency department (PED) and to evaluate health care workers' (HCWs') perceptions of the experience.

Methods: We developed an RoH simulation featuring 25 potential safety hazards derived from actual PED incidents and "never events." The teams of physicians and nurses who participated in the simulation identified as many hazards as they could within a 10-minute window followed by a debriefing session during which errors were corrected and missed hazards were pointed out. The participants' perceptions were measured on a 5-point Likert scale of a questionnaire.

Results: Twenty sessions that included a total of 45 participants were conducted. The teams identified an average of 23 of 25 safety threats, yielding a mean detection rate of 86% for electronic medical record errors, 95% for physical space errors, and 97% for communication errors. The simulation received high ratings for overall positive experience (4.88/5) and impact on daily activities (4.68/5).

Conclusion: The RoH simulation experience was effective in evaluating the level of retention of earlier training and the ability of multidisciplinary teams to correctly identify major safety threats in a PED setting. The participants found the experience valuable and engaging. Future research should focus on other means by which the retention of learned skills can be reinforced and new safety threats can be identified with a high level of alertness.

“恐怖之屋”:用于急诊科减少错误培训的概念验证模拟模型。
目的:本试点研究旨在评估“恐怖房间”(RoH)模拟在儿科急诊科(PED)识别患者安全威胁方面的有效性,并评估卫生保健工作者(HCWs)对该经验的感知。方法:我们开发了一个包含25个潜在安全隐患的RoH模拟,这些潜在安全隐患来自于实际的PED事件和“从未发生过的事件”。参与模拟的医生和护士团队在10分钟的时间内尽可能多地识别出危险,然后进行汇报,在此期间纠正错误并指出遗漏的危险。参与者的认知是用李克特5分制的问卷来衡量的。结果:共进行了20次会议,共45名参与者。这些团队平均确定了25个安全威胁中的23个,电子病历错误的平均检出率为86%,物理空间错误的平均检出率为95%,通信错误的平均检出率为97%。模拟在总体积极体验(4.88/5)和对日常活动的影响(4.68/5)方面获得了很高的评价。结论:RoH模拟经验在评估早期培训的保留水平和多学科团队正确识别PED环境中主要安全威胁的能力方面是有效的。参与者发现这段经历很有价值,也很吸引人。未来的研究应该集中在其他方法上,通过这些方法可以加强对所学技能的保留,并以高度的警觉性识别新的安全威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信