Feasibility of Simon 2-Stage Futility Trials in Early Parkinson Disease: Analysis of the PRECEPT and DATATOP Trial Datasets.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-14 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1212/WNL.0000000000210079
Marcus Werner Koch, Lorraine V Kalia, Justyna R Sarna, Daryl Wile, Tiago A Mestre, Michael G Schlossmacher, Jop Mostert, Eva M M Strijbis, Bernard Uitdehaag, Amber Salter, Gary R Cutter
{"title":"Feasibility of Simon 2-Stage Futility Trials in Early Parkinson Disease: Analysis of the PRECEPT and DATATOP Trial Datasets.","authors":"Marcus Werner Koch, Lorraine V Kalia, Justyna R Sarna, Daryl Wile, Tiago A Mestre, Michael G Schlossmacher, Jop Mostert, Eva M M Strijbis, Bernard Uitdehaag, Amber Salter, Gary R Cutter","doi":"10.1212/WNL.0000000000210079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are a major unmet need in Parkinson disease (PD). To date, trials investigating DMT candidates in PD most often used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. Unfortunately, RCTs to date have not led to a breakthrough, in part because of the large sample sizes and length of follow-up required. In the interest of testing DMT candidates in a more efficient manner, it may be worthwhile to perform futility trials, which are smaller clinical trials that have originally been developed as phase 2 trials in oncology and more recently been used in progressive multiple sclerosis. In this investigation, we used original, patient-level data from DATATOP and PRECEPT, 2 large RCTs in early PD, to explore the feasibility of using the Simon 2-Stage futility trial design in early PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a post hoc analysis of original, patient-level data from the DATATOP and PRECEPT RCTs in early PD. In our analyses, we use descriptive statistics, survival analysis, and binary logistic regression to explore thresholds of change in the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score as the primary outcome measure, length of follow-up, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and projected sample sizes for Simon 2-Stage futility trials in early PD. We also performed bootstrapping experiments to illustrate the ability of trials using the Simon 2-Stage futility design to identify selegiline as nonfutile and tocopherol as futile.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PRECEPT included 806 participants (mean age 59.7 years, SD 10.3, 64.4% male), and DATATOP included 800 participants (mean age 61.1 years, SD 9.5, 64.4% male). Our analyses suggest that futility trials using the Simon 2-Stage methodology are feasible in PD. We propose a 5-point worsening on the UPDRS motor score as the primary outcome measure and a length of follow-up of 12 months. Trial simulations based on these data suggest the required sample size for such clinical trials to be lower than 200 participants.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Based on our analysis of DATATOP and PRECEPT, phase 2 clinical trials using the Simon 2-Stage methodology are feasible in PD and may offer an opportunity to expedite the discovery of promising treatments in early PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19256,"journal":{"name":"Neurology","volume":"104 1","pages":"e210079"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000210079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are a major unmet need in Parkinson disease (PD). To date, trials investigating DMT candidates in PD most often used a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design. Unfortunately, RCTs to date have not led to a breakthrough, in part because of the large sample sizes and length of follow-up required. In the interest of testing DMT candidates in a more efficient manner, it may be worthwhile to perform futility trials, which are smaller clinical trials that have originally been developed as phase 2 trials in oncology and more recently been used in progressive multiple sclerosis. In this investigation, we used original, patient-level data from DATATOP and PRECEPT, 2 large RCTs in early PD, to explore the feasibility of using the Simon 2-Stage futility trial design in early PD.

Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of original, patient-level data from the DATATOP and PRECEPT RCTs in early PD. In our analyses, we use descriptive statistics, survival analysis, and binary logistic regression to explore thresholds of change in the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor score as the primary outcome measure, length of follow-up, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and projected sample sizes for Simon 2-Stage futility trials in early PD. We also performed bootstrapping experiments to illustrate the ability of trials using the Simon 2-Stage futility design to identify selegiline as nonfutile and tocopherol as futile.

Results: PRECEPT included 806 participants (mean age 59.7 years, SD 10.3, 64.4% male), and DATATOP included 800 participants (mean age 61.1 years, SD 9.5, 64.4% male). Our analyses suggest that futility trials using the Simon 2-Stage methodology are feasible in PD. We propose a 5-point worsening on the UPDRS motor score as the primary outcome measure and a length of follow-up of 12 months. Trial simulations based on these data suggest the required sample size for such clinical trials to be lower than 200 participants.

Discussion: Based on our analysis of DATATOP and PRECEPT, phase 2 clinical trials using the Simon 2-Stage methodology are feasible in PD and may offer an opportunity to expedite the discovery of promising treatments in early PD.

早期帕金森病Simon 2期无效试验的可行性:PRECEPT和DATATOP试验数据集的分析。
背景和目的:疾病修饰治疗(dmt)是帕金森病(PD)的主要未满足需求。迄今为止,研究PD患者DMT候选药物的试验通常采用随机对照试验(RCT)设计。不幸的是,到目前为止,随机对照试验还没有取得突破,部分原因是样本量大,随访时间长。为了更有效地测试DMT候选药物,进行无果试验可能是值得的,这是一种较小的临床试验,最初是作为肿瘤的2期试验开发的,最近用于进展性多发性硬化症。在这项研究中,我们使用了来自DATATOP和PRECEPT两项早期帕金森病的大型随机对照试验的原始患者水平数据,以探索在早期帕金森病中使用Simon 2期无效试验设计的可行性。方法:这是对来自DATATOP和PRECEPT随机对照试验的早期PD患者级原始数据的事后分析。在我们的分析中,我们使用描述性统计,生存分析和二元逻辑回归来探索统一帕金森病评定量表(UPDRS)运动评分作为主要结果测量的变化阈值,随访时间,纳入和排除标准,以及早期PD的Simon 2期无效试验的预计样本量。我们还进行了自举实验,以说明使用Simon 2阶段无效设计的试验的能力,以确定selegiline是非无效的,生育酚是无效的。结果:PRECEPT纳入806名参与者(平均年龄59.7岁,SD 10.3,男性64.4%),DATATOP纳入800名参与者(平均年龄61.1岁,SD 9.5,男性64.4%)。我们的分析表明,在PD中使用Simon 2阶段方法的无效试验是可行的。我们建议UPDRS运动评分恶化5分作为主要结局指标,随访时间为12个月。基于这些数据的试验模拟表明,此类临床试验所需的样本量低于200名参与者。讨论:基于我们对DATATOP和PRECEPT的分析,使用Simon 2- stage方法的2期临床试验在帕金森病中是可行的,并且可能为加速发现早期帕金森病有希望的治疗方法提供机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology
Neurology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1973
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurology, the official journal of the American Academy of Neurology, aspires to be the premier peer-reviewed journal for clinical neurology research. Its mission is to publish exceptional peer-reviewed original research articles, editorials, and reviews to improve patient care, education, clinical research, and professionalism in neurology. As the leading clinical neurology journal worldwide, Neurology targets physicians specializing in nervous system diseases and conditions. It aims to advance the field by presenting new basic and clinical research that influences neurological practice. The journal is a leading source of cutting-edge, peer-reviewed information for the neurology community worldwide. Editorial content includes Research, Clinical/Scientific Notes, Views, Historical Neurology, NeuroImages, Humanities, Letters, and position papers from the American Academy of Neurology. The online version is considered the definitive version, encompassing all available content. Neurology is indexed in prestigious databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biological Abstracts®, PsycINFO®, Current Contents®, Web of Science®, CrossRef, and Google Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信