Trilogies: Lessons from 50 Years Facilitating Community-based Health Assessments and Planning in Appalachia.

Journal of Appalachian health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.13023/jah.0601.10
Bruce Behringer
{"title":"Trilogies: Lessons from 50 Years Facilitating Community-based Health Assessments and Planning in Appalachia.","authors":"Bruce Behringer","doi":"10.13023/jah.0601.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Involvement of community and organizational groups is fundamental to most public ventures. Most social, health, economic, and educational improvements in Appalachia have been characterized by successfully integrating community input and finding ways to encourage organizational change and collaboration. Managing group process and related facilitation skills are fundamental competencies for public health professionals and others guiding change efforts. Groups from communities and organizations can get stalled in their deliberations; a facilitator frequently must think quickly to diagnose the situation and propose alternative approaches. Creative and flexible approaches, learned through practice experiences, can blend with theories and frameworks learned in academic preparation from multiple disciplines in order to effectively encourage group progress. Over a 50-year career (1972-2022), sets of three related concepts were formed as trilogies and used during work with groups of diverse compositions, in multiple locations, and addressing varied topics. The trilogies proved helpful in encouraging group tasks related to assessment, planning, monitoring, and evaluation. Trilogies also were deployed as a facilitation technique to pose thoughtful options as groups considered difficult issues and maneuvered through stagnant or conflict-prone situations. This paper presents twelve trilogies organized around six common group-process questions. A reference for the source of each trilogy is provided, and several Appalachian-specific examples of how trilogies were deployed are described.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"6 1-2","pages":"149-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0601.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Involvement of community and organizational groups is fundamental to most public ventures. Most social, health, economic, and educational improvements in Appalachia have been characterized by successfully integrating community input and finding ways to encourage organizational change and collaboration. Managing group process and related facilitation skills are fundamental competencies for public health professionals and others guiding change efforts. Groups from communities and organizations can get stalled in their deliberations; a facilitator frequently must think quickly to diagnose the situation and propose alternative approaches. Creative and flexible approaches, learned through practice experiences, can blend with theories and frameworks learned in academic preparation from multiple disciplines in order to effectively encourage group progress. Over a 50-year career (1972-2022), sets of three related concepts were formed as trilogies and used during work with groups of diverse compositions, in multiple locations, and addressing varied topics. The trilogies proved helpful in encouraging group tasks related to assessment, planning, monitoring, and evaluation. Trilogies also were deployed as a facilitation technique to pose thoughtful options as groups considered difficult issues and maneuvered through stagnant or conflict-prone situations. This paper presents twelve trilogies organized around six common group-process questions. A reference for the source of each trilogy is provided, and several Appalachian-specific examples of how trilogies were deployed are described.

三部曲:50年来在阿巴拉契亚促进社区卫生评估和规划的经验教训。
社区和组织团体的参与是大多数公共事业的基础。阿巴拉契亚地区在社会、卫生、经济和教育方面取得的进步,其特点是成功地整合了社区的投入,并找到了鼓励组织变革和合作的方法。管理群体进程和相关的促进技能是公共卫生专业人员和其他指导变革努力的人的基本能力。来自社区和组织的团体可能会在他们的审议中陷入僵局;推动者经常必须快速思考,以诊断情况并提出替代方法。通过实践经验学习到的创造性和灵活的方法,可以与多学科的学术准备中所学到的理论和框架相结合,从而有效地促进小组的进步。在他50年的职业生涯中(1972-2022),三个相关的概念形成了三部曲,并在不同地点、不同主题的不同组合中使用。这些三部曲被证明有助于鼓励与评估、计划、监控和评价相关的小组任务。三部曲也被用作一种促进技术,在各小组审议困难问题和渡过停滞或容易发生冲突的局势时提出深思熟虑的选择。本文围绕六个常见的群体过程问题提出了十二个三部曲。提供了每个三部曲的来源的参考,并描述了如何部署三部曲的几个appalachian特定示例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信