Trilogies: Lessons from 50 Years Facilitating Community-based Health Assessments and Planning in Appalachia.

Journal of Appalachian health Pub Date : 2024-09-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.13023/jah.0601.10
Bruce Behringer
{"title":"Trilogies: Lessons from 50 Years Facilitating Community-based Health Assessments and Planning in Appalachia.","authors":"Bruce Behringer","doi":"10.13023/jah.0601.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Involvement of community and organizational groups is fundamental to most public ventures. Most social, health, economic, and educational improvements in Appalachia have been characterized by successfully integrating community input and finding ways to encourage organizational change and collaboration. Managing group process and related facilitation skills are fundamental competencies for public health professionals and others guiding change efforts. Groups from communities and organizations can get stalled in their deliberations; a facilitator frequently must think quickly to diagnose the situation and propose alternative approaches. Creative and flexible approaches, learned through practice experiences, can blend with theories and frameworks learned in academic preparation from multiple disciplines in order to effectively encourage group progress. Over a 50-year career (1972-2022), sets of three related concepts were formed as trilogies and used during work with groups of diverse compositions, in multiple locations, and addressing varied topics. The trilogies proved helpful in encouraging group tasks related to assessment, planning, monitoring, and evaluation. Trilogies also were deployed as a facilitation technique to pose thoughtful options as groups considered difficult issues and maneuvered through stagnant or conflict-prone situations. This paper presents twelve trilogies organized around six common group-process questions. A reference for the source of each trilogy is provided, and several Appalachian-specific examples of how trilogies were deployed are described.</p>","PeriodicalId":73599,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Appalachian health","volume":"6 1-2","pages":"149-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11617019/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Appalachian health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13023/jah.0601.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Involvement of community and organizational groups is fundamental to most public ventures. Most social, health, economic, and educational improvements in Appalachia have been characterized by successfully integrating community input and finding ways to encourage organizational change and collaboration. Managing group process and related facilitation skills are fundamental competencies for public health professionals and others guiding change efforts. Groups from communities and organizations can get stalled in their deliberations; a facilitator frequently must think quickly to diagnose the situation and propose alternative approaches. Creative and flexible approaches, learned through practice experiences, can blend with theories and frameworks learned in academic preparation from multiple disciplines in order to effectively encourage group progress. Over a 50-year career (1972-2022), sets of three related concepts were formed as trilogies and used during work with groups of diverse compositions, in multiple locations, and addressing varied topics. The trilogies proved helpful in encouraging group tasks related to assessment, planning, monitoring, and evaluation. Trilogies also were deployed as a facilitation technique to pose thoughtful options as groups considered difficult issues and maneuvered through stagnant or conflict-prone situations. This paper presents twelve trilogies organized around six common group-process questions. A reference for the source of each trilogy is provided, and several Appalachian-specific examples of how trilogies were deployed are described.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信