An eMERGEing definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Jacqueline Fung, Misha Rashkin, Claire Barton, Lizette Grajales, Cheng-Wei Jan, Karlena Lara-Otero, Anjali Narain, Sonia Rios-Ventura, Courtney Rowe-Teeter, Astrid Torres Zapata, Brianna Tucker, James M Ford
{"title":"An eMERGEing definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling.","authors":"Jacqueline Fung, Misha Rashkin, Claire Barton, Lizette Grajales, Cheng-Wei Jan, Karlena Lara-Otero, Anjali Narain, Sonia Rios-Ventura, Courtney Rowe-Teeter, Astrid Torres Zapata, Brianna Tucker, James M Ford","doi":"10.1002/jgc4.2001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The concept of patient engagement has been widely studied for decades in the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, social science, public health, and policy, and increased levels of patient engagement have been shown to improve health outcomes and strengthen reported experiences of care. Despite this, little research has been done to evaluate what patient engagement looks like within the context of a genetic counseling session. Additionally, there is limited literature from researchers based in the United States that aims to better understand patient engagement in non-English-speaking populations. This study is part of a larger protocol entitled \"Multilingual Education Research in Genetic counseling Engagement (MERGE),\" and it explores the elements that make up patient engagement in the context of pre-test genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk among English- and Spanish-speaking patients. Eligible patients were 18 years or older at the time of their genetic counseling visit, had a personal or family history of breast cancer (if English-speaking) or a personal or family history of any cancer (if Spanish-speaking), and had not previously been seen for hereditary cancer genetic counseling. Out of 40 enrolled participants, 60% of patients (24/40) were English-speaking, while 40% of patients (16/40) were Spanish-speaking. In this study, English transcripts were generated from audio-recordings of clinical, standard-of-care genetic counseling sessions. The transcripts were qualitatively coded by two raters using an inductive approach, allowing for big Q thematic analysis. Six major themes were identified, describing ways in which patients show engagement and participate in decision-making during a pre-test genetic counseling session. All data were analyzed collectively, as assessment of differences between the language groups was not a primary analysis question. From the six themes, a definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling is proposed such that it consists of four \"components\" that together promote shared decision-making: Application of Education; Expression of Emotions; Feelings of Ownership; and Therapeutic Alliance. This working definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling has overlap with previous research on patient engagement in healthcare and with the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of genetic counseling. Future research on this topic can investigate methods for measuring and improving patient engagement across different settings and service delivery models.</p>","PeriodicalId":54829,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Genetic Counseling","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jgc4.2001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of patient engagement has been widely studied for decades in the fields of medicine, nursing, psychology, social science, public health, and policy, and increased levels of patient engagement have been shown to improve health outcomes and strengthen reported experiences of care. Despite this, little research has been done to evaluate what patient engagement looks like within the context of a genetic counseling session. Additionally, there is limited literature from researchers based in the United States that aims to better understand patient engagement in non-English-speaking populations. This study is part of a larger protocol entitled "Multilingual Education Research in Genetic counseling Engagement (MERGE)," and it explores the elements that make up patient engagement in the context of pre-test genetic counseling for hereditary cancer risk among English- and Spanish-speaking patients. Eligible patients were 18 years or older at the time of their genetic counseling visit, had a personal or family history of breast cancer (if English-speaking) or a personal or family history of any cancer (if Spanish-speaking), and had not previously been seen for hereditary cancer genetic counseling. Out of 40 enrolled participants, 60% of patients (24/40) were English-speaking, while 40% of patients (16/40) were Spanish-speaking. In this study, English transcripts were generated from audio-recordings of clinical, standard-of-care genetic counseling sessions. The transcripts were qualitatively coded by two raters using an inductive approach, allowing for big Q thematic analysis. Six major themes were identified, describing ways in which patients show engagement and participate in decision-making during a pre-test genetic counseling session. All data were analyzed collectively, as assessment of differences between the language groups was not a primary analysis question. From the six themes, a definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling is proposed such that it consists of four "components" that together promote shared decision-making: Application of Education; Expression of Emotions; Feelings of Ownership; and Therapeutic Alliance. This working definition of patient engagement in genetic counseling has overlap with previous research on patient engagement in healthcare and with the Reciprocal-Engagement Model of genetic counseling. Future research on this topic can investigate methods for measuring and improving patient engagement across different settings and service delivery models.

患者参与遗传咨询的新定义。
几十年来,患者参与的概念在医学、护理、心理学、社会科学、公共卫生和政策等领域得到了广泛的研究,提高患者参与水平已被证明可以改善健康结果并加强报告的护理体验。尽管如此,很少有研究来评估在遗传咨询会议的背景下患者的参与情况。此外,来自美国研究人员的旨在更好地了解非英语人群患者参与的文献有限。这项研究是一项名为“遗传咨询参与中的多语言教育研究(MERGE)”的大型协议的一部分,它探索了在英语和西班牙语患者中,在遗传癌症风险的测试前遗传咨询的背景下,构成患者参与的因素。符合条件的患者在进行遗传咨询时年满18岁,有乳腺癌个人或家族史(如果说英语),或有任何癌症个人或家族史(如果说西班牙语),并且以前没有接受过遗传性癌症遗传咨询。在40名入选的参与者中,60%的患者(24/40)说英语,而40%的患者(16/40)说西班牙语。在这项研究中,从临床,标准护理遗传咨询会议的录音中生成英语转录本。转录本由两名评分员使用归纳方法进行定性编码,允许大Q主题分析。确定了六个主要主题,描述了患者在测试前遗传咨询会议中表现出参与和参与决策的方式。所有的数据都进行了集体分析,因为评估语言群体之间的差异并不是主要的分析问题。从六个主题中,提出了患者参与遗传咨询的定义,即它由四个“组成部分”组成,共同促进共同决策:教育的应用;情绪的表达;所有权感;和治疗联盟。遗传咨询中患者参与的工作定义与先前关于患者参与医疗保健和遗传咨询的双向参与模型的研究重叠。未来对这一主题的研究可以探讨在不同环境和服务提供模式下衡量和提高患者参与度的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Genetic Counseling
Journal of Genetic Counseling GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
26.30%
发文量
113
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Genetic Counseling (JOGC), published for the National Society of Genetic Counselors, is a timely, international forum addressing all aspects of the discipline and practice of genetic counseling. The journal focuses on the critical questions and problems that arise at the interface between rapidly advancing technological developments and the concerns of individuals and communities at genetic risk. The publication provides genetic counselors, other clinicians and health educators, laboratory geneticists, bioethicists, legal scholars, social scientists, and other researchers with a premier resource on genetic counseling topics in national, international, and cross-national contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信