[Comparative Evaluation of Encephalon State Index and Bispectral Index in Monitoring the Depth of Anesthesia during the Surgical Anesthesia Stage].

Q4 Medicine

中国医疗器械杂志 Pub Date : 2024-11-30 DOI:10.12455/j.issn.1671-7104.240143

Sanchao Liu, Nong Yan, Xingliang Jin, Xianliang He, Ke Xiao, Hanyuan Luo, Huacheng Luo, Yongjun Zeng, Jie Qin, Yinbing Yang, Yalan Li, Lan Gao

{"title":"[Comparative Evaluation of Encephalon State Index and Bispectral Index in Monitoring the Depth of Anesthesia during the Surgical Anesthesia Stage].","authors":"Sanchao Liu, Nong Yan, Xingliang Jin, Xianliang He, Ke Xiao, Hanyuan Luo, Huacheng Luo, Yongjun Zeng, Jie Qin, Yinbing Yang, Yalan Li, Lan Gao","doi":"10.12455/j.issn.1671-7104.240143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Evaluate the performance of the encephalon state index (ESI) in depth of anesthesia monitoring during clinical surgery, compared with the bispectral index (BIS).Methods: ESI and BIS data were collected from 60 patients in a single-center clinical trial to compare their efficacy in measuring the depth of anesthesia.Results: Consistency analysis revealed mean differences and standard deviations of －0.18 ± 5.42 and －0.11 ± 6.51 between ESI and BIS for awake and anesthetized states, respectively. Correlation analysis showed a correlation coefficient of 0.92 throughout the operative period. Prediction probability analysis indicated that both ESI and BIS had prediction probabilities of 0.97, effectively predicting anesthesia status.Conclusion: ESI and BIS show good equivalence in monitoring depth of anesthesia during clinical surgery, which meet the requirements of clinical anesthesia.","PeriodicalId":52535,"journal":{"name":"中国医疗器械杂志","volume":"48 6","pages":"639-644"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国医疗器械杂志","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12455/j.issn.1671-7104.240143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the performance of the encephalon state index (ESI) in depth of anesthesia monitoring during clinical surgery, compared with the bispectral index (BIS).

Methods: ESI and BIS data were collected from 60 patients in a single-center clinical trial to compare their efficacy in measuring the depth of anesthesia.

Results: Consistency analysis revealed mean differences and standard deviations of －0.18 ± 5.42 and －0.11 ± 6.51 between ESI and BIS for awake and anesthetized states, respectively. Correlation analysis showed a correlation coefficient of 0.92 throughout the operative period. Prediction probability analysis indicated that both ESI and BIS had prediction probabilities of 0.97, effectively predicting anesthesia status.

Conclusion: ESI and BIS show good equivalence in monitoring depth of anesthesia during clinical surgery, which meet the requirements of clinical anesthesia.

查看原文本刊更多论文

[手术麻醉阶段脑状态指数与双谱指数监测麻醉深度的比较评价]。

目的：评价脑状态指数（ESI）在临床手术麻醉深度监测中的应用，并与双谱指数（BIS）进行比较。方法：在一项单中心临床试验中收集60例患者的ESI和BIS数据，比较它们在测量麻醉深度方面的效果。结果：一致性分析显示，ESI与BIS在清醒和麻醉状态下的平均差异和标准差分别为-0.18±5.42和-0.11±6.51。相关分析显示，全手术期相关系数为0.92。预测概率分析表明，ESI和BIS的预测概率均为0.97，可有效预测麻醉状态。结论：ESI与BIS在临床手术中监测麻醉深度具有良好的等效性，满足临床麻醉的要求。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

中国医疗器械杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)

CiteScore

0.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

8086

期刊介绍： Chinese Journal of Medical Instrumentation mainly reports on the development, progress, research and development, production, clinical application, management, and maintenance of medical devices and biomedical engineering. Its aim is to promote the exchange of information on medical devices and biomedical engineering in China and turn the journal into a high-quality academic journal that leads academic directions and advocates academic debates.