Perspectives on goal setting: Video-reflexive ethnography with speech–language therapists and clients

IF 1.5 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Laurien Brauner, Karin Neijenhuis, Ruth Dalemans, Philip J. van der Wees, Ellen Gerrits
{"title":"Perspectives on goal setting: Video-reflexive ethnography with speech–language therapists and clients","authors":"Laurien Brauner,&nbsp;Karin Neijenhuis,&nbsp;Ruth Dalemans,&nbsp;Philip J. van der Wees,&nbsp;Ellen Gerrits","doi":"10.1111/1460-6984.13138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Goal setting is an essential step in the clinical reasoning process of speech and language therapists (SLTs) who provide care for children, adolescents and adults with communication disorders. In the light of person-centred care, shared or collaborative goal setting between the SLT and client is advised in (inter)national guidelines. SLTs face challenges in implementing (shared) goal setting as theoretical frameworks and practical interventions are scarce and less applicable to use with a wide range of communication vulnerable populations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>A first step in developing theory and practical interventions is to explore first-hand experiences of SLTs and clients about day-to-day goal-setting practice. This study was guided by the following research question: What are the perspectives and needs of SLTs and persons with communication disorders regarding (shared) goal setting in routine SLT services?</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods &amp; Procedures</h3>\n \n <p>The qualitative study was carried out in the setting of routine speech–language therapy services in community practices, primary education and neurological rehabilitation in the Netherlands. Data collection followed the principles of video-reflexive ethnography, using video footage of goal-setting conversations to facilitate semi-structured, reflexive interviews. Data analysis was based on reflexive thematic analysis. A total of 12 interviews were conducted with client–SLT dyads, covering perspectives from children, parents and adults with a range of communication difficulties and their SLTs.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Outcomes &amp; Results</h3>\n \n <p>Data analysis resulted in four themes, of which two contain subthemes. Each theme represents a central organizing concept found in SLT and client interviews. The themes were identified as: (1) goal setting is a complex process; (2) goal talk needs to be communication accessible; (3) communicative participation goals are hard to grasp; and (4) the importance of relationships. Topics such as power imbalance, communication vulnerability, effective communication strategies, and motivation and trust are explored under these themes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions &amp; Implications</h3>\n \n <p>SLTs are encouraged to view shared goal setting as a process that needs to be explicitly planned and communicated with clients regardless of their age or communication vulnerability. SLTs have expert knowledge and skills when it comes to supporting communication and applying these skills during goal talks might strengthen shared goal setting and foster a therapeutic relationship. There is a need to concretely conceptualize and embed shared goal setting in policy and clinical guidelines. The themes reported have tentative clinical implications for developing such policy, and shared goal-setting interventions for SLT practice, under the condition that SLTs and people with communication disorders are continuously involved.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS</h3>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What is already known on the subject</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>SLTs want to set meaningful goals together with their patients but lack theory and resources to effectively shape the goal-setting process. Few studies have directly reported on the perspectives and needs of SLTs and patients regarding goal setting. Patients generally perceive goal setting as a vague activity in which they minimally participate. SLTs want to involve patients in the goal-setting process and describe the potential benefits, but they also want to report barriers on the systemic and professional competence level.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What this paper adds to the existing knowledge</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>SLTs and patients perceive shared goal setting as a multifaceted process, rather than a one-off conversation. This process holds potential vulnerabilities for SLTs and patients alike, and the themes in this study propose potentially helpful ingredients to mediate this vulnerability and shape the goal-setting process.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> What are the potential or clinical implications of this work?</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>To take the first steps towards effective shared goal setting, SLTs should embrace the element of discovery in goal setting and apply their expert knowledge in supporting communication. To develop practical interventions for SLTs, shared goal setting needs to be further conceptualized and embedded in policy and clinical guidelines.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":49182,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11619741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1460-6984.13138","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Goal setting is an essential step in the clinical reasoning process of speech and language therapists (SLTs) who provide care for children, adolescents and adults with communication disorders. In the light of person-centred care, shared or collaborative goal setting between the SLT and client is advised in (inter)national guidelines. SLTs face challenges in implementing (shared) goal setting as theoretical frameworks and practical interventions are scarce and less applicable to use with a wide range of communication vulnerable populations.

Aims

A first step in developing theory and practical interventions is to explore first-hand experiences of SLTs and clients about day-to-day goal-setting practice. This study was guided by the following research question: What are the perspectives and needs of SLTs and persons with communication disorders regarding (shared) goal setting in routine SLT services?

Methods & Procedures

The qualitative study was carried out in the setting of routine speech–language therapy services in community practices, primary education and neurological rehabilitation in the Netherlands. Data collection followed the principles of video-reflexive ethnography, using video footage of goal-setting conversations to facilitate semi-structured, reflexive interviews. Data analysis was based on reflexive thematic analysis. A total of 12 interviews were conducted with client–SLT dyads, covering perspectives from children, parents and adults with a range of communication difficulties and their SLTs.

Outcomes & Results

Data analysis resulted in four themes, of which two contain subthemes. Each theme represents a central organizing concept found in SLT and client interviews. The themes were identified as: (1) goal setting is a complex process; (2) goal talk needs to be communication accessible; (3) communicative participation goals are hard to grasp; and (4) the importance of relationships. Topics such as power imbalance, communication vulnerability, effective communication strategies, and motivation and trust are explored under these themes.

Conclusions & Implications

SLTs are encouraged to view shared goal setting as a process that needs to be explicitly planned and communicated with clients regardless of their age or communication vulnerability. SLTs have expert knowledge and skills when it comes to supporting communication and applying these skills during goal talks might strengthen shared goal setting and foster a therapeutic relationship. There is a need to concretely conceptualize and embed shared goal setting in policy and clinical guidelines. The themes reported have tentative clinical implications for developing such policy, and shared goal-setting interventions for SLT practice, under the condition that SLTs and people with communication disorders are continuously involved.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

What is already known on the subject

  • SLTs want to set meaningful goals together with their patients but lack theory and resources to effectively shape the goal-setting process. Few studies have directly reported on the perspectives and needs of SLTs and patients regarding goal setting. Patients generally perceive goal setting as a vague activity in which they minimally participate. SLTs want to involve patients in the goal-setting process and describe the potential benefits, but they also want to report barriers on the systemic and professional competence level.

What this paper adds to the existing knowledge

  • SLTs and patients perceive shared goal setting as a multifaceted process, rather than a one-off conversation. This process holds potential vulnerabilities for SLTs and patients alike, and the themes in this study propose potentially helpful ingredients to mediate this vulnerability and shape the goal-setting process.

What are the potential or clinical implications of this work?

  • To take the first steps towards effective shared goal setting, SLTs should embrace the element of discovery in goal setting and apply their expert knowledge in supporting communication. To develop practical interventions for SLTs, shared goal setting needs to be further conceptualized and embedded in policy and clinical guidelines.
目标设定的观点:语音语言治疗师和客户的视频反射民族志。
背景:目标设定是为患有交流障碍的儿童、青少年和成人提供护理的言语和语言治疗师(SLTs)临床推理过程中必不可少的一步。鉴于以人为本的护理,在(国际)国家指南中建议SLT和客户之间共同或合作设定目标。由于理论框架和实际干预措施缺乏,并且不太适用于广泛的沟通弱势群体,特殊语言组织在实施(共同)目标设定方面面临挑战。目的:发展理论和实践干预的第一步是探索学习语言教师和客户关于日常目标设定实践的第一手经验。本研究以以下研究问题为指导:在常规语言交际服务中,语言交际者和沟通障碍患者对(共同)目标设定的看法和需求是什么?方法与步骤:在荷兰社区实践、小学教育和神经康复的常规语言治疗服务设置中进行定性研究。数据收集遵循视频反射性人种学的原则,使用目标设定对话的视频片段来促进半结构化的反射性访谈。数据分析基于反身性主题分析。本研究共进行了12次访谈,访谈对象包括有不同沟通困难的儿童、家长和成人及其slt。结果与结果:数据分析得出四个主题,其中两个包含子主题。每个主题都代表了SLT和客户访谈中发现的一个中心组织概念。主题确定为:(1)目标设定是一个复杂的过程;(2)目标谈话需要易于沟通;(3)交际参与目标难以把握;(4)人际关系的重要性。这些主题探讨了权力失衡、沟通脆弱性、有效沟通策略、动机与信任等主题。结论和启示:鼓励slt将共同目标设定视为一个需要明确计划的过程,并与客户进行沟通,而不考虑他们的年龄或沟通脆弱性。slt在支持沟通方面拥有专业知识和技能,在目标谈话中应用这些技能可能会加强共同的目标设定,促进治疗关系。有必要在政策和临床指南中具体概念化和嵌入共同目标设定。报告的主题对制定此类政策具有初步的临床意义,并在SLT和沟通障碍患者持续参与的情况下,为SLT实践设定共同的目标干预措施。本文补充的内容:在这个主题上已经知道的是,slt希望与患者一起设定有意义的目标,但缺乏有效塑造目标设定过程的理论和资源。很少有研究直接报道slt和患者在目标设定方面的观点和需求。患者通常认为目标设定是一种模糊的活动,他们很少参与。slt希望让患者参与目标设定过程,并描述潜在的好处,但他们也希望报告系统和专业能力水平上的障碍。这篇论文增加了slt和患者认为共同目标设定是一个多方面的过程,而不是一次性的对话。这一过程对slt和患者都具有潜在的脆弱性,本研究的主题提出了潜在的有益成分来调节这一脆弱性并塑造目标设定过程。这项工作的潜在或临床意义是什么?为了向有效的共同目标设定迈出第一步,语言教师应该在目标设定中融入发现的元素,并运用他们的专业知识来支持沟通。为了为slt制定切实可行的干预措施,需要进一步概念化共同目标设定,并将其纳入政策和临床指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders (IJLCD) is the official journal of the Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. The Journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of speech, language, communication disorders and speech and language therapy. It provides a forum for the exchange of information and discussion of issues of clinical or theoretical relevance in the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信