The Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Hypertension Management of Adults in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q3 REHABILITATION
Valentin Dones, Abigail Anne G Velasquez, Maureen G Dacuya, Kirsten Ermengild T Ignacio, Ella Teresa M Cavite, Ronan S Ibuna, Christian Rey D Rimando
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Telemedicine in Hypertension Management of Adults in Rural Communities: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Valentin Dones, Abigail Anne G Velasquez, Maureen G Dacuya, Kirsten Ermengild T Ignacio, Ella Teresa M Cavite, Ronan S Ibuna, Christian Rey D Rimando","doi":"10.1002/pri.70014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telemedicine has emerged as an effective approach for managing hypertension, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited. This review evaluates telemedicine's role in providing essential remote healthcare services for hypertension management.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We determined the effectiveness of telemedicine versus the usual care in hypertension management among adults living in rural settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on adults aged 18 and older with hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg) using telehealth services in rural or community-based settings. We searched nine databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest, up to April 2024, without restrictions on language or publication year, focusing only on human subjects. Five pairs of reviewers independently screened and selected studies using predefined eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool, and data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model due to study heterogeneity. Evidence quality was evaluated using the GRADE approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine randomized trials were included. Pooled data showed no clinically significant differences between telehealth and control groups in improving systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and their changes over time. The mean difference (MD) of SBP in five trials was 0.78 mmHg lower (95% CI: 2.49 lower to 0.94 higher), and the SBP change showed a mean reduction of 2.29 mmHg (95% CI: 4.76 lower to 0.19 higher). DBP in five trials had a mean increase of 0.46 mmHg (95% CI: 0.73 lower to 1.64 higher), and DBP change in six trials showed a mean decrease of 0.83 mmHg (95% CI: 2.34 lower to 0.68 higher). Additionally, telehealth showed varying impacts on BMI and HbA1c levels, with one study reporting a higher BMI increase in the intervention group, while two other studies indicated that mobile health improved HbA1c levels and controlled blood pressure as effectively as standard care.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Study heterogeneity, selection, and performance biases, as well as varying healthcare contexts, limited the generalizability of findings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telemedicine is as effective as usual care in managing hypertension among adults in rural settings, providing a viable solution for improving healthcare access in these areas. Future research should address biases and explore long-term impacts to optimize telemedicine's effectiveness in diverse populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 1","pages":"e70014"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine has emerged as an effective approach for managing hypertension, particularly in rural areas where healthcare access is limited. This review evaluates telemedicine's role in providing essential remote healthcare services for hypertension management.

Objective: We determined the effectiveness of telemedicine versus the usual care in hypertension management among adults living in rural settings.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) focusing on adults aged 18 and older with hypertension (blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg) using telehealth services in rural or community-based settings. We searched nine databases, including PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ProQuest, up to April 2024, without restrictions on language or publication year, focusing only on human subjects. Five pairs of reviewers independently screened and selected studies using predefined eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Revised Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool, and data synthesis was performed using a random-effects model due to study heterogeneity. Evidence quality was evaluated using the GRADE approach.

Results: Nine randomized trials were included. Pooled data showed no clinically significant differences between telehealth and control groups in improving systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and their changes over time. The mean difference (MD) of SBP in five trials was 0.78 mmHg lower (95% CI: 2.49 lower to 0.94 higher), and the SBP change showed a mean reduction of 2.29 mmHg (95% CI: 4.76 lower to 0.19 higher). DBP in five trials had a mean increase of 0.46 mmHg (95% CI: 0.73 lower to 1.64 higher), and DBP change in six trials showed a mean decrease of 0.83 mmHg (95% CI: 2.34 lower to 0.68 higher). Additionally, telehealth showed varying impacts on BMI and HbA1c levels, with one study reporting a higher BMI increase in the intervention group, while two other studies indicated that mobile health improved HbA1c levels and controlled blood pressure as effectively as standard care.

Limitations: Study heterogeneity, selection, and performance biases, as well as varying healthcare contexts, limited the generalizability of findings.

Conclusion: Telemedicine is as effective as usual care in managing hypertension among adults in rural settings, providing a viable solution for improving healthcare access in these areas. Future research should address biases and explore long-term impacts to optimize telemedicine's effectiveness in diverse populations.

远程医疗在农村社区成人高血压管理中的有效性:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:远程医疗已成为管理高血压的一种有效方法,特别是在医疗保健机会有限的农村地区。这篇综述评估了远程医疗在为高血压管理提供基本远程医疗服务方面的作用。目的:我们确定远程医疗与常规护理在农村成人高血压管理中的有效性。方法:我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾,这些随机对照试验的重点是在农村或社区环境中使用远程医疗服务的18岁及以上高血压(血压≥140/90 mmHg)的成年人。我们检索了9个数据库,包括PubMed, ScienceDirect和ProQuest,截止到2024年4月,没有语言或出版年份的限制,只关注人类受试者。五对审稿人使用预定义的资格标准独立筛选和选择研究。采用修订后的Cochrane协作偏倚风险工具评估方法学质量,由于研究异质性,采用随机效应模型进行数据综合。采用GRADE方法评价证据质量。结果:纳入9项随机试验。汇总数据显示,远程医疗组与对照组在改善收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)及其随时间变化方面无临床显著差异。5项试验中收缩压的平均差值(MD)降低0.78 mmHg (95% CI: 2.49低至0.94高),收缩压变化显示平均降低2.29 mmHg (95% CI: 4.76低至0.19高)。5项试验的舒张压平均升高0.46 mmHg (95% CI: 0.73低至1.64高),6项试验的舒张压变化平均降低0.83 mmHg (95% CI: 2.34低至0.68高)。此外,远程医疗显示出对BMI和HbA1c水平的不同影响,一项研究报告干预组的BMI增加更高,而另外两项研究表明,移动医疗改善了HbA1c水平,并与标准护理一样有效地控制了血压。局限性:研究异质性、选择和表现偏差,以及不同的医疗环境,限制了研究结果的普遍性。结论:远程医疗在管理农村成人高血压方面与常规护理一样有效,为改善这些地区的医疗保健可及性提供了可行的解决方案。未来的研究应解决偏见并探索长期影响,以优化远程医疗在不同人群中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信