Listening to Our Students: What are the Most Important Factors When Choosing a Physical Therapy Program.

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Michael J Tautonico, Christopher Voltmer, Shaina Flanzraich, Kelsy Hill, John Petrizzo, Cheryl A Hall
{"title":"Listening to Our Students: What are the Most Important Factors When Choosing a Physical Therapy Program.","authors":"Michael J Tautonico, Christopher Voltmer, Shaina Flanzraich, Kelsy Hill, John Petrizzo, Cheryl A Hall","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Technology, distance learning, and social media have changed the landscape of physical therapy education. Modifications are needed to meet the needs of applicants and align with the current healthcare environment.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify the most important factors students consider when selecting a physical therapist education program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey including free response options was shared with physical therapist education program students by chairpersons and through student interest groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>545 responses representing 46 states and all CAPTE geographical regions were analyzed. The most important factors when selecting a program were: location (65.9%), tuition (64.8%), perception of physical therapy education quality (39.1%), and national board pass rate (34.1%). The least important factors were: technology utilization (74.3%), class size (46.1%), and national ranking/ reputation (45.1%). Also, the majority of respondents preferred in-person educational delivery (94.7%). 75.4% reported program length was not a factor in applying to a program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Programs should seek to meet the needs of applicants with consideration of meaningful elements in choosing a program. Students ranked \"location\" and \"tuition\" as primary considerations for choosing a program, which may be related to curtailing debt by living at home while in school. \"Program quality,\" over \"reputation/ranking,\" suggests the importance of a robust curriculum, which is viewed as a predictor of passing the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE).</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 4","pages":"e201-e212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Technology, distance learning, and social media have changed the landscape of physical therapy education. Modifications are needed to meet the needs of applicants and align with the current healthcare environment.

Purpose: To identify the most important factors students consider when selecting a physical therapist education program.

Methods: A survey including free response options was shared with physical therapist education program students by chairpersons and through student interest groups.

Results: 545 responses representing 46 states and all CAPTE geographical regions were analyzed. The most important factors when selecting a program were: location (65.9%), tuition (64.8%), perception of physical therapy education quality (39.1%), and national board pass rate (34.1%). The least important factors were: technology utilization (74.3%), class size (46.1%), and national ranking/ reputation (45.1%). Also, the majority of respondents preferred in-person educational delivery (94.7%). 75.4% reported program length was not a factor in applying to a program.

Conclusions: Programs should seek to meet the needs of applicants with consideration of meaningful elements in choosing a program. Students ranked "location" and "tuition" as primary considerations for choosing a program, which may be related to curtailing debt by living at home while in school. "Program quality," over "reputation/ranking," suggests the importance of a robust curriculum, which is viewed as a predictor of passing the National Physical Therapy Examination (NPTE).

听我们的学生:选择物理治疗项目时最重要的因素是什么?
技术、远程学习和社交媒体已经改变了物理治疗教育的格局。需要进行修改,以满足申请人的需求,并与当前的医疗保健环境保持一致。目的:确定学生在选择物理治疗师教育项目时考虑的最重要因素。方法:通过主持人和学生兴趣小组与物理治疗师教育项目学生分享一份包括自由回答选项的调查。结果:分析了代表46个州和所有CAPTE地理区域的545份回复。在选择项目时,最重要的因素是:地点(65.9%)、学费(64.8%)、对物理治疗教育质量的感知(39.1%)和全国委员会通过率(34.1%)。最不重要的因素是:技术利用率(74.3%)、班级规模(46.1%)和国家排名/声誉(45.1%)。此外,大多数受访者更喜欢面对面的教育交付(94.7%)。75.4%的人表示,课程长度不是申请课程的一个因素。结论:项目在选择项目时应考虑有意义的因素,以满足申请人的需求。学生们将“地理位置”和“学费”列为选择课程的主要考虑因素,这可能与在校期间住在家里以减少债务有关。“项目质量”高于“声誉/排名”,表明了一个健全的课程的重要性,它被视为通过国家物理治疗考试(NPTE)的预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信