Defining Doctoral-Prepared Health Scientists' Identity.

Journal of Allied Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01
Genevieve Pinto Zipp, Beverly W Henry, Lynda Goodfellow, Douglas Kuperman, Christina B Gunther, Laurie Cathers, Kieran Fogarty
{"title":"Defining Doctoral-Prepared Health Scientists' Identity.","authors":"Genevieve Pinto Zipp, Beverly W Henry, Lynda Goodfellow, Douglas Kuperman, Christina B Gunther, Laurie Cathers, Kieran Fogarty","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teamwork skills across disciplines are increasingly required for delivery of quality health care. To meet this expectation, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and educators must embrace and employ the tenets associated with teamwork. In addition, health professions faculty are expected to prepare entry-level professionals for interprofessional practice and scholarship. While various strategies reported in the literature document how entry-level health science educational programs infuse and assess the impact of interprofessional education experiences, less emphasis has been placed on understanding how faculty prepare to take on this role. Traditional doctoral education has been offered as a discipline-specific, silo-based learning experience that provides an in-depth analysis into a specific content area of interest. With the expanding emphasis on interprofessional practice in health care, an interprofessional forward-thinking approach to graduate education at the doctoral level emerged, the health science doctorate. This commentary paper seeks to describe the health scientist's identity as a scholar-practitioner who supports and advances interprofessional education and practice. Doctoral-prepared health scientists act as knowledge brokers, translators, and change agents, exemplifying interprofessional research and communication skills. Faculty need to prepare students to explain complex concepts, engage in clinical reasoning, and decision-making, and employ observational and data analysis to improve health professions education and ultimately team-based care.</p>","PeriodicalId":35979,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Allied Health","volume":"53 4","pages":"298-301"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Allied Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teamwork skills across disciplines are increasingly required for delivery of quality health care. To meet this expectation, healthcare professionals, researchers, policymakers, and educators must embrace and employ the tenets associated with teamwork. In addition, health professions faculty are expected to prepare entry-level professionals for interprofessional practice and scholarship. While various strategies reported in the literature document how entry-level health science educational programs infuse and assess the impact of interprofessional education experiences, less emphasis has been placed on understanding how faculty prepare to take on this role. Traditional doctoral education has been offered as a discipline-specific, silo-based learning experience that provides an in-depth analysis into a specific content area of interest. With the expanding emphasis on interprofessional practice in health care, an interprofessional forward-thinking approach to graduate education at the doctoral level emerged, the health science doctorate. This commentary paper seeks to describe the health scientist's identity as a scholar-practitioner who supports and advances interprofessional education and practice. Doctoral-prepared health scientists act as knowledge brokers, translators, and change agents, exemplifying interprofessional research and communication skills. Faculty need to prepare students to explain complex concepts, engage in clinical reasoning, and decision-making, and employ observational and data analysis to improve health professions education and ultimately team-based care.

定义博士预备健康科学家的身份。
提供高质量的卫生保健越来越需要跨学科的团队合作技能。为了满足这一期望,医疗保健专业人员、研究人员、政策制定者和教育工作者必须接受并运用与团队合作有关的原则。此外,卫生专业教师有望为跨专业实践和奖学金准备入门级专业人员。虽然文献中有各种各样的策略报告了入门级健康科学教育项目如何注入和评估跨专业教育经验的影响,但很少强调理解教师如何准备承担这一角色。传统的博士教育是一种特定学科的、基于竖井的学习体验,提供对感兴趣的特定内容领域的深入分析。随着对医疗保健跨专业实践的日益重视,出现了一种跨专业的前瞻性博士研究生教育方法,即健康科学博士学位。这篇评论文章试图描述健康科学家的身份,作为一个学者的从业者谁支持和推进跨专业的教育和实践。准备博士学位的卫生科学家充当知识经纪人、翻译和变革推动者,体现了跨专业研究和沟通技巧。教师需要让学生准备好解释复杂的概念,参与临床推理和决策,并运用观察和数据分析来改善卫生专业教育,最终实现团队护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Allied Health
Journal of Allied Health Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of Allied Health is the official publication of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) . The Journal is the only interdisciplinary allied health periodical, publishing scholarly works related to research and development, feature articles, research abstracts and book reviews. Readers of The Journal comprise allied health leaders, educators, faculty and students. Subscribers to The Journal consist of domestic and international college and university libraries, health organizations and hospitals. Almost 20% of subscribers, in the last three years, have been from outside of the United States. Subscribers include the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association and major universities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信