External Validation of Vision, Aphasia and Neglect, Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion Screening Tools for Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
İbrahim Ulaş Özturan MD , Duygu Ferek Emir MD , Adnan Karadaş MD , Cansu Alyeşil Özturan MD , Uğur Durmuş MD , Nurettin Özgür Doğan MD , Elif Yaka MD , Serkan Yılmaz MD , Murat Pekdemir MD
{"title":"External Validation of Vision, Aphasia and Neglect, Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion Screening Tools for Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: A Multicenter, Prospective, Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"İbrahim Ulaş Özturan MD ,&nbsp;Duygu Ferek Emir MD ,&nbsp;Adnan Karadaş MD ,&nbsp;Cansu Alyeşil Özturan MD ,&nbsp;Uğur Durmuş MD ,&nbsp;Nurettin Özgür Doğan MD ,&nbsp;Elif Yaka MD ,&nbsp;Serkan Yılmaz MD ,&nbsp;Murat Pekdemir MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Vision, Aphasia, and Neglect (VAN), Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (VES), and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion (LARIO) are promising stroke screening tools that were shown to have high diagnostic performance to detect Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (ELVO) in their derivation studies.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to assess the validation of VAN, VES, and LARIO in predicting ELVO among patients presenting at emergency department (ED) triage with suspected acute ischemic stroke.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This is a prospective multicenter study conducted in five EDs of tertiary stroke centers between June and October 2023. Patients with suspected stroke admitted to ED for triage were evaluated using the VAN, VES, and LARIO stroke screening tools. Diagnostic performances of these tools for predicting ELVO were determined and compared with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 614 patients were included. The prevalence of ELVO was found to be 23.5% in the study population. VAN exhibited a sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 78.7%, VES showed a higher sensitivity (79.1%) with lower specificity (63.4%), while LARIO displayed high specificity (86%) with lower sensitivity (56.3%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that LARIO and NIHSS had similar diagnostic performance (areas under the curve [AUC] 0.801 and 0.805, <em>p</em> = 0.7, respectively), while VES showed a modestly poorer performance (AUC 0.746, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001 and <em>p</em> = 0.003).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The comparable diagnostic performance of VAN, VES, and LARIO to the NIHSS, in addition to their straightforwardness and rapid evaluation time, can facilitate optimal care for patients with ELVO in prehospital or ED triage settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 15-24"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736467924002324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vision, Aphasia, and Neglect (VAN), Ventura Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (VES), and Large Artery Intracranial Occlusion (LARIO) are promising stroke screening tools that were shown to have high diagnostic performance to detect Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion (ELVO) in their derivation studies.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess the validation of VAN, VES, and LARIO in predicting ELVO among patients presenting at emergency department (ED) triage with suspected acute ischemic stroke.

Methods

This is a prospective multicenter study conducted in five EDs of tertiary stroke centers between June and October 2023. Patients with suspected stroke admitted to ED for triage were evaluated using the VAN, VES, and LARIO stroke screening tools. Diagnostic performances of these tools for predicting ELVO were determined and compared with the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).

Results

A total of 614 patients were included. The prevalence of ELVO was found to be 23.5% in the study population. VAN exhibited a sensitivity of 70.1% and specificity of 78.7%, VES showed a higher sensitivity (79.1%) with lower specificity (63.4%), while LARIO displayed high specificity (86%) with lower sensitivity (56.3%). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that LARIO and NIHSS had similar diagnostic performance (areas under the curve [AUC] 0.801 and 0.805, p = 0.7, respectively), while VES showed a modestly poorer performance (AUC 0.746, p < 0.001 and p = 0.003).

Conclusion

The comparable diagnostic performance of VAN, VES, and LARIO to the NIHSS, in addition to their straightforwardness and rapid evaluation time, can facilitate optimal care for patients with ELVO in prehospital or ED triage settings.
视觉、失语和忽视、Ventura紧急大血管闭塞和大动脉颅内闭塞筛查工具在紧急大血管闭塞卒中中的外部验证:一项多中心、前瞻性、横断面研究。
背景:视觉、失语和忽视(VAN)、文图拉突发性大血管闭塞(VES)和大动脉颅内闭塞(LARIO)是很有前途的卒中筛查工具,在它们的衍生研究中显示出对突发性大血管闭塞(ELVO)有很高的诊断性能。目的:本研究旨在评估VAN、VES和LARIO在急诊科(ED)分诊疑似急性缺血性脑卒中患者ELVO预测中的有效性。方法:这是一项前瞻性多中心研究,于2023年6月至10月在5个三级脑卒中中心的急诊科进行。使用VAN、VES和LARIO脑卒中筛查工具对入院接受分诊的疑似脑卒中患者进行评估。确定这些预测ELVO的工具的诊断性能,并与美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)进行比较。结果:共纳入614例患者。研究人群中ELVO的患病率为23.5%。VAN的敏感性为70.1%,特异性为78.7%;VES的敏感性为79.1%,特异性为63.4%;LARIO的特异性为86%,敏感性为56.3%。受试者工作特征曲线分析显示,LARIO和NIHSS具有相似的诊断性能(曲线下面积[AUC]分别为0.801和0.805,p = 0.7),而VES的诊断性能稍差(AUC为0.746,p < 0.001和p = 0.003)。结论:VAN、VES和LARIO的诊断性能与NIHSS相当,且其直接性和快速的评估时间可以促进院前或急诊科分诊设置中ELVO患者的最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信