Cardiopulmonary Ultrasound to Predict Care Escalation in Early Sepsis: A Pilot Study

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Hani I. Kuttab MD , Sara C. Damewood MD , Jessica Schmidt MD, MPH , Amber Lin MS , Kevin Emmerich MD , Nikolai Schnittke MD, PhD
{"title":"Cardiopulmonary Ultrasound to Predict Care Escalation in Early Sepsis: A Pilot Study","authors":"Hani I. Kuttab MD ,&nbsp;Sara C. Damewood MD ,&nbsp;Jessica Schmidt MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Amber Lin MS ,&nbsp;Kevin Emmerich MD ,&nbsp;Nikolai Schnittke MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jemermed.2024.07.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is challenging to identify emergency department (ED) patients with sepsis who will require resources such as positive-pressure ventilation, vasopressors, or intensive care unit (ICU) admission.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>Describe the correlation of cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS) with need for care escalation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Single center, prospective, observational study of adult patients with suspected sepsis. CPUS assessed left ventricular systolic function (LVF), right ventricular (RV) size and function, inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility, and thoracic B lines. The primary composite outcome was need for care escalation within 12 hours of ED presentation defined as: ICU admission or positive-pressure ventilation or vasopressor infusion.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 92 patients were enrolled; 18 (19.6%) required care escalation. A logistic regression model identified the presence of ≥4 thoracic B-lines as a statistically significant predictor of care escalation (OR 7.8, 95% CI [1.3–26.4], <em>p =</em> 0.002). Other features positively correlated with care escalation were: reduced LVF (OR 4.26, 95% CI [0.06–12.9], <em>p =</em> 0.14), and dilated RV size (OR 2.8, 95% CI [0.4–11.8], <em>p =</em> 0.16). A retrospective stepwise regression model incorporating these three variables to predict care escalation showed an AUROC = 0.75 (95% CI [0.63–0.88]). When 2 or more variables were abnormal the model showed excellent specificity of 95% (LR+ 6.2), but low sensitivity of 33% (LR- 0.7).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients with concern for sepsis early findings of ≥4 B-lines is associated with care escalation. Combining this finding with LVF and RV size assessment improves the positive predictive power and may be useful in rapid identification of patients likely to require care escalation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16085,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"68 ","pages":"Pages 54-65"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S073646792400235X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It is challenging to identify emergency department (ED) patients with sepsis who will require resources such as positive-pressure ventilation, vasopressors, or intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Objectives

Describe the correlation of cardiopulmonary ultrasound (CPUS) with need for care escalation.

Methods

Single center, prospective, observational study of adult patients with suspected sepsis. CPUS assessed left ventricular systolic function (LVF), right ventricular (RV) size and function, inferior vena cava (IVC) collapsibility, and thoracic B lines. The primary composite outcome was need for care escalation within 12 hours of ED presentation defined as: ICU admission or positive-pressure ventilation or vasopressor infusion.

Results

A total of 92 patients were enrolled; 18 (19.6%) required care escalation. A logistic regression model identified the presence of ≥4 thoracic B-lines as a statistically significant predictor of care escalation (OR 7.8, 95% CI [1.3–26.4], p = 0.002). Other features positively correlated with care escalation were: reduced LVF (OR 4.26, 95% CI [0.06–12.9], p = 0.14), and dilated RV size (OR 2.8, 95% CI [0.4–11.8], p = 0.16). A retrospective stepwise regression model incorporating these three variables to predict care escalation showed an AUROC = 0.75 (95% CI [0.63–0.88]). When 2 or more variables were abnormal the model showed excellent specificity of 95% (LR+ 6.2), but low sensitivity of 33% (LR- 0.7).

Conclusions

In patients with concern for sepsis early findings of ≥4 B-lines is associated with care escalation. Combining this finding with LVF and RV size assessment improves the positive predictive power and may be useful in rapid identification of patients likely to require care escalation.
心肺超声预测早期败血症的护理升级:一项试点研究。
背景:确定急诊科(ED)脓毒症患者需要正压通气、血管加压药物或重症监护病房(ICU)住院等资源是具有挑战性的。目的:描述心肺超声(cpu)与护理升级需求的相关性。方法:对疑似脓毒症的成人患者进行单中心、前瞻性、观察性研究。cpu评估左心室收缩功能(LVF)、右心室(RV)大小和功能、下腔静脉(IVC)溃散性和胸B线。主要综合结局是ED出现后12小时内护理升级的需要,定义为:ICU入院或正压通气或血管加压剂输注。结果:共纳入92例患者;18例(19.6%)需要升级护理。logistic回归模型确定≥4条胸部b线的存在是护理升级的统计学显著预测因子(OR 7.8, 95% CI [1.3-26.4], p = 0.002)。其他与护理升级呈正相关的特征包括:LVF降低(OR 4.26, 95% CI [0.06-12.9], p = 0.14)和RV扩大(OR 2.8, 95% CI [0.4-11.8], p = 0.16)。纳入这三个变量的回顾性逐步回归模型预测护理升级的AUROC = 0.75 (95% CI[0.63-0.88])。当2个或更多变量异常时,该模型的特异性为95% (LR+ 6.2),但敏感性较低,为33% (LR- 0.7)。结论:在关注败血症的患者中,早期发现≥4个b线与护理升级相关。将这一发现与LVF和RV大小评估相结合,提高了阳性预测能力,可能有助于快速识别可能需要升级护理的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Emergency Medicine
Journal of Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
339
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed publication featuring original contributions of interest to both the academic and practicing emergency physician. JEM, published monthly, contains research papers and clinical studies as well as articles focusing on the training of emergency physicians and on the practice of emergency medicine. The Journal features the following sections: • Original Contributions • Clinical Communications: Pediatric, Adult, OB/GYN • Selected Topics: Toxicology, Prehospital Care, The Difficult Airway, Aeromedical Emergencies, Disaster Medicine, Cardiology Commentary, Emergency Radiology, Critical Care, Sports Medicine, Wound Care • Techniques and Procedures • Technical Tips • Clinical Laboratory in Emergency Medicine • Pharmacology in Emergency Medicine • Case Presentations of the Harvard Emergency Medicine Residency • Visual Diagnosis in Emergency Medicine • Medical Classics • Emergency Forum • Editorial(s) • Letters to the Editor • Education • Administration of Emergency Medicine • International Emergency Medicine • Computers in Emergency Medicine • Violence: Recognition, Management, and Prevention • Ethics • Humanities and Medicine • American Academy of Emergency Medicine • AAEM Medical Student Forum • Book and Other Media Reviews • Calendar of Events • Abstracts • Trauma Reports • Ultrasound in Emergency Medicine
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信