Artifact identification and removal methodologies for intracranial pressure signals: a systematic scoping review.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Tobias Bergmann, Nuray Vakitbilir, Alwyn Gomez, Abrar Islam, Kevin Y Stein, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Noah Silvaggio, Izzy Marquez, Logan Froese, Frederick A Zeiler
{"title":"Artifact identification and removal methodologies for intracranial pressure signals: a systematic scoping review.","authors":"Tobias Bergmann, Nuray Vakitbilir, Alwyn Gomez, Abrar Islam, Kevin Y Stein, Amanjyot Singh Sainbhi, Noah Silvaggio, Izzy Marquez, Logan Froese, Frederick A Zeiler","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/ad9af4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Intracranial pressure measurement (ICP) is an essential component of deriving of multivariate data metrics foundational to improving understanding of high temporal relationships in cerebral physiology. A significant barrier to this work is artifact ridden data. As such, the objective of this review was to examine the existing literature pertinent to ICP artifact management.<i>Methods.</i>A search of five databases (BIOSIS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review. The search question examined the methods for artifact management for ICP signals measured in human/animals.<i>Results.</i>The search yielded 5875 unique results. There were 19 articles included in this review based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and article references. Each method presented was categorized as: (1) valid ICP pulse detection algorithms and (2) ICP artifact identification and removal methods. Machine learning-based and filter-based methods indicated the best results for artifact management; however, it was not possible to elucidate a single most robust method.<i>Conclusion.</i>There is a significant lack of standardization in the metrics of effectiveness in artifact removal which makes comparison difficult across studies. Differences in artifacts observed on patient neuropathological health and recording methodologies have not been thoroughly examined and introduce additional uncertainty regarding effectiveness.<i>Significance</i>. This work provides critical insights into existing literature pertaining to ICP artifact management as it highlights holes in the literature that need to be adequately addressed in the establishment of robust artifact management methodologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/ad9af4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Intracranial pressure measurement (ICP) is an essential component of deriving of multivariate data metrics foundational to improving understanding of high temporal relationships in cerebral physiology. A significant barrier to this work is artifact ridden data. As such, the objective of this review was to examine the existing literature pertinent to ICP artifact management.Methods.A search of five databases (BIOSIS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed, and Cochrane Library) was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines with the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Review. The search question examined the methods for artifact management for ICP signals measured in human/animals.Results.The search yielded 5875 unique results. There were 19 articles included in this review based on inclusion/exclusion criteria and article references. Each method presented was categorized as: (1) valid ICP pulse detection algorithms and (2) ICP artifact identification and removal methods. Machine learning-based and filter-based methods indicated the best results for artifact management; however, it was not possible to elucidate a single most robust method.Conclusion.There is a significant lack of standardization in the metrics of effectiveness in artifact removal which makes comparison difficult across studies. Differences in artifacts observed on patient neuropathological health and recording methodologies have not been thoroughly examined and introduce additional uncertainty regarding effectiveness.Significance. This work provides critical insights into existing literature pertaining to ICP artifact management as it highlights holes in the literature that need to be adequately addressed in the establishment of robust artifact management methodologies.

颅内压信号的伪影识别和去除方法:一个系统的范围审查。
目的:颅内压测量(ICP)是获得多变量数据指标的重要组成部分,是提高对大脑生理学中高时间关系的理解的基础。这项工作的一个重要障碍是工件数据。因此,本综述的目的是检查与ICP工件管理相关的现有文献。方法:基于系统评价和元分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目和范围评价扩展,对五个数据库(BIOSIS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, PubMed和Cochrane Library)进行了搜索。搜索问题检查了在人/动物中测量的ICP信号的人工管理方法。 ;结果:搜索产生了5,875个唯一结果。根据纳入/排除标准和文献参考,本综述纳入了19篇文章。提出的每种方法分为:(1)有效的ICP脉冲检测算法和(2)ICP伪迹识别和去除方法。基于机器学习和基于过滤器的方法对工件管理效果最好;然而,不可能阐明一种最强大的方法。结论:在人工制品去除的有效性度量方面明显缺乏标准化,这使得跨研究的比较变得困难。在患者神经病理健康和记录方法上观察到的伪影差异尚未得到彻底检查,并引入了有关有效性的额外不确定性。意义:这项工作提供了对与ICP工件管理相关的现有文献的重要见解,因为它突出了在建立健壮的工件管理方法时需要充分解决的文献中的漏洞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信