Is Artificial Intelligence the Future of Radiology? Accuracy of ChatGPT in Radiologic Diagnosis of Upper Extremity Bony Pathology.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
HAND Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1177/15589447241298982
Annika N Hiredesai, Casey J Martinez, Megan L Anderson, Carina P Howlett, Krishna D Unadkat, Shelley S Noland
{"title":"Is Artificial Intelligence the Future of Radiology? Accuracy of ChatGPT in Radiologic Diagnosis of Upper Extremity Bony Pathology.","authors":"Annika N Hiredesai, Casey J Martinez, Megan L Anderson, Carina P Howlett, Krishna D Unadkat, Shelley S Noland","doi":"10.1177/15589447241298982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool to aid in diagnostic accuracy and patient communication. Prior literature has shown that ChatGPT answers medical questions and can accurately diagnose surgical conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of ChatGPT 4.0 in evaluating radiologic imaging of common orthopedic upper extremity bony pathologies, including identifying the imaging modality and diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Diagnostic imaging was sourced from an open-source radiology database for 6 common upper extremity bony pathologies: distal radius fracture (DRF), metacarpal fracture (MFX), carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC), humerus fracture (HFX), scaphoid fracture (SFX), and scaphoid nonunion (SN). X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities were included. Fifty images were randomly selected from each pathology where possible. Images were uploaded to ChatGPT 4.0 and queried for imaging modality, laterality, and diagnosis. Each image query was completed in a new ChatGPT search tab. Multinomial linear regression was used to identify variations in ChatGPT's diagnostic accuracy across imaging modalities and medical conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, ChatGPT provided a diagnosis for 52% of images, with accuracy ranging from 0% to 55%. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly lower for SFX and MFX relative to HFX. ChatGPT was significantly less likely to provide a diagnosis for MRI relative to CT. Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 0% to 40% with regard to imaging modality (x-ray, CT, MRI) though this difference was not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT's accuracy varied significantly between conditions and imaging modalities, though its iterative learning capabilities suggest potential for future diagnostic utility within hand surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12902,"journal":{"name":"HAND","volume":" ","pages":"15589447241298982"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11624516/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HAND","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15589447241298982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is a promising tool to aid in diagnostic accuracy and patient communication. Prior literature has shown that ChatGPT answers medical questions and can accurately diagnose surgical conditions. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of ChatGPT 4.0 in evaluating radiologic imaging of common orthopedic upper extremity bony pathologies, including identifying the imaging modality and diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: Diagnostic imaging was sourced from an open-source radiology database for 6 common upper extremity bony pathologies: distal radius fracture (DRF), metacarpal fracture (MFX), carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (CMC), humerus fracture (HFX), scaphoid fracture (SFX), and scaphoid nonunion (SN). X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities were included. Fifty images were randomly selected from each pathology where possible. Images were uploaded to ChatGPT 4.0 and queried for imaging modality, laterality, and diagnosis. Each image query was completed in a new ChatGPT search tab. Multinomial linear regression was used to identify variations in ChatGPT's diagnostic accuracy across imaging modalities and medical conditions.

Results: Overall, ChatGPT provided a diagnosis for 52% of images, with accuracy ranging from 0% to 55%. Diagnostic accuracy was significantly lower for SFX and MFX relative to HFX. ChatGPT was significantly less likely to provide a diagnosis for MRI relative to CT. Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 0% to 40% with regard to imaging modality (x-ray, CT, MRI) though this difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions: ChatGPT's accuracy varied significantly between conditions and imaging modalities, though its iterative learning capabilities suggest potential for future diagnostic utility within hand surgery.

人工智能是放射学的未来吗?ChatGPT在上肢骨病理影像学诊断中的准确性。
背景:人工智能(AI)是一种很有前途的工具,可以帮助提高诊断准确性和患者沟通。先前的文献表明,ChatGPT可以回答医学问题,并能准确诊断手术情况。本研究的目的是确定ChatGPT 4.0在评估常见骨科上肢骨病变放射成像中的准确性,包括确定成像方式和诊断准确性。方法:从开源放射学数据库中获取6种常见上肢骨性病变的诊断影像:桡骨远端骨折(DRF)、掌骨骨折(MFX)、腕掌骨骨关节炎(CMC)、肱骨骨折(HFX)、舟状骨骨折(SFX)和舟状骨不连(SN)。包括x射线、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)。在可能的情况下,从每种病理中随机选择50张图像。将图像上传到ChatGPT 4.0,查询成像方式、侧位和诊断。每个图像查询都在一个新的ChatGPT搜索选项卡中完成。使用多项线性回归来确定ChatGPT在不同成像方式和医疗条件下诊断准确性的变化。结果:总体而言,ChatGPT为52%的图像提供了诊断,准确率从0%到55%不等。与HFX相比,SFX和MFX的诊断准确性明显较低。相对于CT, ChatGPT提供MRI诊断的可能性明显较低。在影像学(x线、CT、MRI)方面,诊断准确率从0%到40%不等,尽管这种差异没有统计学意义。结论:ChatGPT的准确性在不同的条件和成像方式之间差异很大,尽管它的迭代学习能力表明了未来在手外科诊断中的应用潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HAND
HAND Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
209
期刊介绍: HAND is the official journal of the American Association for Hand Surgery and is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians worldwide presenting current research and clinical work in the field of hand surgery. It features articles related to all aspects of hand and upper extremity surgery and the post operative care and rehabilitation of the hand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信