Exploring the potential of flour, starch concentrate, and protein concentrate from Richlea lentils in the development of lentil based extruded puffs

IF 3.4 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Edwin Allan, Dilpreet S. Bajwa, Girish M. Ganjyal, Sun-Hwa Kim, Kevin E. McPhee, Moses Obiri-Yeboah, Wan-Yuan Kuo
{"title":"Exploring the potential of flour, starch concentrate, and protein concentrate from Richlea lentils in the development of lentil based extruded puffs","authors":"Edwin Allan,&nbsp;Dilpreet S. Bajwa,&nbsp;Girish M. Ganjyal,&nbsp;Sun-Hwa Kim,&nbsp;Kevin E. McPhee,&nbsp;Moses Obiri-Yeboah,&nbsp;Wan-Yuan Kuo","doi":"10.1111/1750-3841.17555","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lentil puffs were developed from a mixed design of varying weight fractions of lentil flour (<i>x</i>1), lentil starch concentrate (<i>x</i>2), and lentil protein concentrate (<i>x</i>3) using a twin-screw pilot scale extruder at a dry feed rate of 20 kg/h (d.b.), a water feed rate of 2 kg/h, and an extruder screw speed of 350 rpm. Evaluations of the extrudate properties (expansion ratio, unit density), instrumental texture (hardness, crunchiness, and crispiness), and sensory properties (overall and texture liking, just about right (JAR), and check all that apply (CATA) were conducted, and the optimum lentil puff formulation was determined from sensory liking. Increasing <i>x</i>1 and <i>x</i>2 both increased the expansion ratio of the lentil puffs, whereas the interactions of <i>x</i>3 with <i>x</i>1 and <i>x</i>2 both reduced the unit density. All three formulation factors positively impacted the instrumental crunchiness and crispiness of the lentil puffs, whereas <i>x</i>3 had a larger impact on crunchiness, and <i>x</i>1 and <i>x</i>2 had a larger impact on crispiness. Lentil puff formulations with <i>x</i>3 ≥ 0.66 presented significantly lower sensory liking scores than those with <i>x</i>2 ≥ 0.33. The JAR test revealed that all lentil puff formulations were penalized for not having the right level of hardness, whereas the CATA test identified the crispy and crunchy attributes to positively correlate with overall and texture liking scores. The optimum lentil puff formulation was predicted from a maximum overall liking score of 6.1 and texture liking score of 6.7, to contain 50% (w/w, d.b.) of lentil starch concentrate and 25% of both lentil flour and lentil protein concentrate.</p>","PeriodicalId":193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Science","volume":"89 12","pages":"9622-9637"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1750-3841.17555","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lentil puffs were developed from a mixed design of varying weight fractions of lentil flour (x1), lentil starch concentrate (x2), and lentil protein concentrate (x3) using a twin-screw pilot scale extruder at a dry feed rate of 20 kg/h (d.b.), a water feed rate of 2 kg/h, and an extruder screw speed of 350 rpm. Evaluations of the extrudate properties (expansion ratio, unit density), instrumental texture (hardness, crunchiness, and crispiness), and sensory properties (overall and texture liking, just about right (JAR), and check all that apply (CATA) were conducted, and the optimum lentil puff formulation was determined from sensory liking. Increasing x1 and x2 both increased the expansion ratio of the lentil puffs, whereas the interactions of x3 with x1 and x2 both reduced the unit density. All three formulation factors positively impacted the instrumental crunchiness and crispiness of the lentil puffs, whereas x3 had a larger impact on crunchiness, and x1 and x2 had a larger impact on crispiness. Lentil puff formulations with x3 ≥ 0.66 presented significantly lower sensory liking scores than those with x2 ≥ 0.33. The JAR test revealed that all lentil puff formulations were penalized for not having the right level of hardness, whereas the CATA test identified the crispy and crunchy attributes to positively correlate with overall and texture liking scores. The optimum lentil puff formulation was predicted from a maximum overall liking score of 6.1 and texture liking score of 6.7, to contain 50% (w/w, d.b.) of lentil starch concentrate and 25% of both lentil flour and lentil protein concentrate.

探索从小扁豆中提取面粉、淀粉浓缩物和蛋白质浓缩物在小扁豆基膨化泡芙开发中的潜力。
采用双螺杆中试挤出机,在干料速度为20 kg/h (d.b),进水速度为2 kg/h,挤出机螺杆转速为350 rpm的条件下,将不同重量的扁豆粉(x1)、扁豆淀粉浓缩物(x2)和扁豆蛋白浓缩物(x3)混合在一起,制成扁豆泡饼。对膨化物性能(膨胀比、单位密度)、仪器质地(硬度、松脆度、酥脆度)、感官性能(整体和质地喜欢度,刚刚好(JAR))和检查所有适用(CATA)进行了评价,并从感官喜欢度确定了最佳扁豆膨化物配方。增加x1和x2均增加了扁豆膨化率,而x3与x1和x2的相互作用均降低了单位密度。3个配方因子均对扁豆泡芙的工具性松脆度和酥脆度有正向影响,其中x3对松脆度影响较大,x1和x2对酥脆度影响较大。x3≥0.66的扁豆膨化配方感官喜好得分显著低于x2≥0.33的配方。JAR测试显示,所有扁豆膨化配方都因硬度不合适而被扣分,而CATA测试则发现,扁豆的脆脆属性与总体和质地喜欢度得分呈正相关。结果表明,最优扁豆膨化配方的总体喜欢度最高为6.1分,质地喜欢度最高为6.7分,其中扁豆淀粉浓缩物的含量为50% (w/w, d / b),扁豆粉和扁豆蛋白浓缩物的含量均为25%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Food Science
Journal of Food Science 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.60%
发文量
412
审稿时长
3.1 months
期刊介绍: The goal of the Journal of Food Science is to offer scientists, researchers, and other food professionals the opportunity to share knowledge of scientific advancements in the myriad disciplines affecting their work, through a respected peer-reviewed publication. The Journal of Food Science serves as an international forum for vital research and developments in food science. The range of topics covered in the journal include: -Concise Reviews and Hypotheses in Food Science -New Horizons in Food Research -Integrated Food Science -Food Chemistry -Food Engineering, Materials Science, and Nanotechnology -Food Microbiology and Safety -Sensory and Consumer Sciences -Health, Nutrition, and Food -Toxicology and Chemical Food Safety The Journal of Food Science publishes peer-reviewed articles that cover all aspects of food science, including safety and nutrition. Reviews should be 15 to 50 typewritten pages (including tables, figures, and references), should provide in-depth coverage of a narrowly defined topic, and should embody careful evaluation (weaknesses, strengths, explanation of discrepancies in results among similar studies) of all pertinent studies, so that insightful interpretations and conclusions can be presented. Hypothesis papers are especially appropriate in pioneering areas of research or important areas that are afflicted by scientific controversy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信