Routine peri-operative cessation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists has unintended consequences

IF 7.5 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia Pub Date : 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1111/anae.16509
Nicholas A. Levy, Sarah L. Tinsley, Ketan Dhatariya
{"title":"Routine peri-operative cessation of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists has unintended consequences","authors":"Nicholas A. Levy,&nbsp;Sarah L. Tinsley,&nbsp;Ketan Dhatariya","doi":"10.1111/anae.16509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We read with interest the study by Nersessian et al., in which they showed that semaglutide use was associated with increased residual gastric content in patients having surgery [<span>1</span>]. They call for urgent revision of current societal guidelines recommending a 1-week pre-operative discontinuation interval of semaglutide in patients undergoing elective procedures under anaesthesia [<span>1</span>]. It is salutary to note that the exclusion criteria for the study were very extensive and included patients with diabetes; hiatus hernia; previous gastric surgery; chronic renal failure; and the pre-operative use of medication known to affect gastric emptying. The exclusion of so many patients and conditions has an impact on the suitability and applicability of the results of this study to influence routine practice.</p><p>There are many other drugs that can delay gastric emptying. These include opioids; anticholinergics; calcium channel blockers; and tricyclic antidepressants, and there is no call for revised societal guidelines on the peri-operative use of these drugs to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Furthermore, the evidence linking any potential increased residual gastric content associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use to an increased risk of aspiration and regurgitation is lacking.</p><p>Peri-operative cessation of GLP-1 RAs has unintended consequences, particularly when used for the treatment of diabetes. This includes increasing the risk of further delays to surgery due to deranged pre-operative glucose and harm from peri-operative hyperglycaemia [<span>2</span>]. Having the patient reviewed by a diabetologist and replacing the GLP-1 RAs with alternative drugs in the peri-operative period is an option, but this may lead to further delays in surgery and harm from hypoglycaemia [<span>2</span>].</p><p>In response to the American Society of Anesthesiologists consensus-based guidance on the pre-operative management of patients on GLP-1 RAs, the Centre for Perioperative Care released UK guidance in September 2023 [<span>3</span>]. This stated that anaesthetists should undertake individualised clinical assessment and precautions, which include regional anaesthesia; tracheal intubation; modified rapid sequence intubation; ramped position; awake tracheal extubation; avoidance of first-generation supraglottic airway devices; and pre-operative gastric ultrasound [<span>3</span>]. A more recent clinical practice guideline also supports this stance, but with other caveats, including greater emphasis on shared decision-making and a pre-operative liquid diet for the 24 h before surgery for those at high risk [<span>4</span>]. It is noteworthy that the American Society of Anesthesiologists has also approved this new guideline [<span>4</span>].</p><p>Rather than curtailing the peri-operative use of GLP-1 RAs, we argue that the study by Nersessian et al. reinforces the stated position of the Centre for Perioperative Care, and other societies, that GLP-1 RAs should be continued in the peri-operative period, but suitable precautions are taken.</p>","PeriodicalId":7742,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia","volume":"80 3","pages":"339-340"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/anae.16509","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.16509","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We read with interest the study by Nersessian et al., in which they showed that semaglutide use was associated with increased residual gastric content in patients having surgery [1]. They call for urgent revision of current societal guidelines recommending a 1-week pre-operative discontinuation interval of semaglutide in patients undergoing elective procedures under anaesthesia [1]. It is salutary to note that the exclusion criteria for the study were very extensive and included patients with diabetes; hiatus hernia; previous gastric surgery; chronic renal failure; and the pre-operative use of medication known to affect gastric emptying. The exclusion of so many patients and conditions has an impact on the suitability and applicability of the results of this study to influence routine practice.

There are many other drugs that can delay gastric emptying. These include opioids; anticholinergics; calcium channel blockers; and tricyclic antidepressants, and there is no call for revised societal guidelines on the peri-operative use of these drugs to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. Furthermore, the evidence linking any potential increased residual gastric content associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) use to an increased risk of aspiration and regurgitation is lacking.

Peri-operative cessation of GLP-1 RAs has unintended consequences, particularly when used for the treatment of diabetes. This includes increasing the risk of further delays to surgery due to deranged pre-operative glucose and harm from peri-operative hyperglycaemia [2]. Having the patient reviewed by a diabetologist and replacing the GLP-1 RAs with alternative drugs in the peri-operative period is an option, but this may lead to further delays in surgery and harm from hypoglycaemia [2].

In response to the American Society of Anesthesiologists consensus-based guidance on the pre-operative management of patients on GLP-1 RAs, the Centre for Perioperative Care released UK guidance in September 2023 [3]. This stated that anaesthetists should undertake individualised clinical assessment and precautions, which include regional anaesthesia; tracheal intubation; modified rapid sequence intubation; ramped position; awake tracheal extubation; avoidance of first-generation supraglottic airway devices; and pre-operative gastric ultrasound [3]. A more recent clinical practice guideline also supports this stance, but with other caveats, including greater emphasis on shared decision-making and a pre-operative liquid diet for the 24 h before surgery for those at high risk [4]. It is noteworthy that the American Society of Anesthesiologists has also approved this new guideline [4].

Rather than curtailing the peri-operative use of GLP-1 RAs, we argue that the study by Nersessian et al. reinforces the stated position of the Centre for Perioperative Care, and other societies, that GLP-1 RAs should be continued in the peri-operative period, but suitable precautions are taken.

围手术期常规停用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂会产生意想不到的后果
我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Nersessian等人的研究,在该研究中,他们表明,在接受手术的患者中,使用西马鲁肽与胃残留内容物增加有关。他们呼吁紧急修订目前的社会指南,建议在麻醉下进行选择性手术的患者术前1周停用西马鲁肽。值得注意的是,该研究的排除标准非常广泛,包括糖尿病患者;食管裂孔疝;既往胃手术;慢性肾衰竭;以及术前使用影响胃排空的药物。排除了如此多的患者和条件,影响了本研究结果对常规实践的适用性和适用性。还有许多其他药物可以延缓胃排空。这些包括阿片类药物;抗胆碱能类;钙通道阻滞剂;还有三环抗抑郁药,没有人呼吁修改这些药物围手术期使用的社会指南,以降低肺误吸的风险。此外,尚无证据表明胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)的使用与误吸和反流风险的增加有关。围手术期停用GLP-1 RAs会产生意想不到的后果,尤其是用于治疗糖尿病时。这包括增加因术前血糖紊乱而进一步延迟手术的风险和围手术期高血糖的危害。让患者接受糖尿病专家的复查,并在围手术期用替代药物替代GLP-1 RAs是一种选择,但这可能会导致手术进一步延迟和低血糖的危害。为响应美国麻醉师学会关于GLP-1 RAs患者术前管理的共识指南,围手术期护理中心于2023年9月发布了英国指南。这表明麻醉师应该进行个体化的临床评估和预防措施,其中包括区域麻醉;气管插管;改良快速顺序插管;增加位置;清醒气管拔管;避免使用第一代声门上气道装置;术前胃超声[3]。最近的临床实践指南也支持这一立场,但有其他警告,包括更强调共同决策和术前24小时液体饮食的高风险bbb。值得注意的是,美国麻醉医师协会也批准了这一新的指南。我们认为Nersessian等人的研究强化了围手术期护理中心和其他协会的立场,而不是减少GLP-1 RAs的围手术期使用,即GLP-1 RAs应在围手术期继续使用,但应采取适当的预防措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anaesthesia
Anaesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
21.20
自引率
9.30%
发文量
300
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Association of Anaesthetists is Anaesthesia. It is a comprehensive international publication that covers a wide range of topics. The journal focuses on general and regional anaesthesia, as well as intensive care and pain therapy. It includes original articles that have undergone peer review, covering all aspects of these fields, including research on equipment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信