Carolyn G. DiGuiseppi MD, MPH, PhD, Linda L. Hill MD, MPH, Nicole R. Fowler PhD, MHSA, Rachel L. Johnson MS, Ryan A. Peterson PhD, S. Duke Han PhD, Brandon Josewski BS, Christopher E. Knoepke PhD, MSW, Daniel D. Matlock MD, MPH, Faris Omeragic BS, Marian E. Betz MD, MPH
{"title":"An online driving decision aid for older drivers reduces ambivalence and regret about driving decisions: Randomized trial","authors":"Carolyn G. DiGuiseppi MD, MPH, PhD, Linda L. Hill MD, MPH, Nicole R. Fowler PhD, MHSA, Rachel L. Johnson MS, Ryan A. Peterson PhD, S. Duke Han PhD, Brandon Josewski BS, Christopher E. Knoepke PhD, MSW, Daniel D. Matlock MD, MPH, Faris Omeragic BS, Marian E. Betz MD, MPH","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Decisions about driving cessation can be stressful for older adults. We tested effects of a driving decision aid (DDA) on psychosocial outcomes among older drivers during two-year follow-up.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Multisite randomized controlled trial of licensed drivers ages ≥70 with at least one diagnosis associated with increased likelihood of driving cessation, without significant cognitive impairment. The intervention was the online Healthwise® DDA, addressing “Is it time to stop driving?”; controls received National Institute on Aging web-based information for older drivers. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Primary outcomes were the Decision Regret Scale, Decisional Conflict Scale (assessing decisional ambivalence or uncertainty), and PROMIS Depression (4a) Scale. Self-reported Life-Space Assessment (assessing community mobility), crashes and driving outcomes were also assessed. Using intention-to-treat analyses, we tested whether DDA (vs. control) effects on each outcome differed during follow-up using a study group by time interaction. Longitudinal outcomes were modeled using generalized linear mixed models, accounting for repeated measures, age, site, and baseline visit before vs. during COVID.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We enrolled 301 participants (age at enrollment: mean 77.1 (range 70–92) years; 51% identifying as female). During follow-up, the DDA group had less decisional conflict (p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.010) and decision regret (p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.012). The DDA had its greatest effect on decisional conflict immediately post-intervention (adjusted mean ratio [aMR] = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.79, 0.97) and on decision regret at 12-month follow-up (aMR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.27, 0.72). Odds of depression were similar between groups during follow-up (p<sub>interaction</sub> = 0.237). The intervention did not negatively affect life space, crashes, or other driving outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>In older drivers, the Healthwise® DDA reduced uncertainty and regret about driving decisions during longitudinal follow-up, without adversely affecting community mobility or crash risk. Use of DDAs in clinical and other settings may reduce the distress older adults often experience when making decisions about driving cessation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":"73 2","pages":"492-505"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jgs.19293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Decisions about driving cessation can be stressful for older adults. We tested effects of a driving decision aid (DDA) on psychosocial outcomes among older drivers during two-year follow-up.
Methods
Multisite randomized controlled trial of licensed drivers ages ≥70 with at least one diagnosis associated with increased likelihood of driving cessation, without significant cognitive impairment. The intervention was the online Healthwise® DDA, addressing “Is it time to stop driving?”; controls received National Institute on Aging web-based information for older drivers. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. Primary outcomes were the Decision Regret Scale, Decisional Conflict Scale (assessing decisional ambivalence or uncertainty), and PROMIS Depression (4a) Scale. Self-reported Life-Space Assessment (assessing community mobility), crashes and driving outcomes were also assessed. Using intention-to-treat analyses, we tested whether DDA (vs. control) effects on each outcome differed during follow-up using a study group by time interaction. Longitudinal outcomes were modeled using generalized linear mixed models, accounting for repeated measures, age, site, and baseline visit before vs. during COVID.
Results
We enrolled 301 participants (age at enrollment: mean 77.1 (range 70–92) years; 51% identifying as female). During follow-up, the DDA group had less decisional conflict (pinteraction = 0.010) and decision regret (pinteraction = 0.012). The DDA had its greatest effect on decisional conflict immediately post-intervention (adjusted mean ratio [aMR] = 0.87; 95%CI: 0.79, 0.97) and on decision regret at 12-month follow-up (aMR = 0.45; 95%CI: 0.27, 0.72). Odds of depression were similar between groups during follow-up (pinteraction = 0.237). The intervention did not negatively affect life space, crashes, or other driving outcomes.
Conclusions
In older drivers, the Healthwise® DDA reduced uncertainty and regret about driving decisions during longitudinal follow-up, without adversely affecting community mobility or crash risk. Use of DDAs in clinical and other settings may reduce the distress older adults often experience when making decisions about driving cessation.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) is the go-to journal for clinical aging research. We provide a diverse, interprofessional community of healthcare professionals with the latest insights on geriatrics education, clinical practice, and public policy—all supporting the high-quality, person-centered care essential to our well-being as we age. Since the publication of our first edition in 1953, JAGS has remained one of the oldest and most impactful journals dedicated exclusively to gerontology and geriatrics.