Evaluating the impact of patient–staff interactions on sleep opportunities using the electronic health record

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Sullafa Kadura MD, MBA, Lisa Pink MS, Diego R. Mazzotti PhD, Kathleen Fear PhD
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of patient–staff interactions on sleep opportunities using the electronic health record","authors":"Sullafa Kadura MD, MBA,&nbsp;Lisa Pink MS,&nbsp;Diego R. Mazzotti PhD,&nbsp;Kathleen Fear PhD","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hospitalized patients often experience disrupted sleep due to nighttime patient–staff interactions (PSIs). This study evaluates how PSIs impact sleep opportunities in neurology inpatients using electronic health record (EHR) data and introduces surrogate measures of sleep such as longest uninterrupted sleep opportunity (LUSO) and interruptive episodes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To develop a methodology leveraging time-stamped EHR data to quantify and visualize the impact of PSIs on inpatient sleep opportunities.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We analyzed 3305 patient nights in an inpatient neurology unit, categorizing PSIs into six types: vital signs, neurological checks, medication administration, bedside diagnostic testing, off-unit diagnostic testing, and bed changes. We calculated LUSO and interruptive episodes and used a linear mixed model to assess the relationship between PSIs and LUSO.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>PSIs occurred in 92% of patient nights, averaging 2.81 interruptive episodes and 4.06 h of LUSO per night. Vital signs and medication administrations were the most frequent PSIs. Neurological checks and off-unit diagnostic testing were associated with the largest reductions in LUSO (approximately 40 min), followed by bed changes (−33.79 min).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study demonstrates the utility of LUSO and interruptive episodes as EHR-based measures to link PSIs to sleep opportunities. While vital signs and medications were the most frequent PSIs, neurological checks and off-unit testing were associated with the largest impact on reducing LUSO. The predominance of single-PSI interruptive episodes underscores that the bundling of PSIs is not occurring. These findings highlight that PSIs impact sleep opportunities in distinct ways, supporting the use of this methodology to evaluate and address EHR-linked disruptions to patient sleep.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":"20 6","pages":"581-587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Hospitalized patients often experience disrupted sleep due to nighttime patient–staff interactions (PSIs). This study evaluates how PSIs impact sleep opportunities in neurology inpatients using electronic health record (EHR) data and introduces surrogate measures of sleep such as longest uninterrupted sleep opportunity (LUSO) and interruptive episodes.

Objective

To develop a methodology leveraging time-stamped EHR data to quantify and visualize the impact of PSIs on inpatient sleep opportunities.

Methods

We analyzed 3305 patient nights in an inpatient neurology unit, categorizing PSIs into six types: vital signs, neurological checks, medication administration, bedside diagnostic testing, off-unit diagnostic testing, and bed changes. We calculated LUSO and interruptive episodes and used a linear mixed model to assess the relationship between PSIs and LUSO.

Results

PSIs occurred in 92% of patient nights, averaging 2.81 interruptive episodes and 4.06 h of LUSO per night. Vital signs and medication administrations were the most frequent PSIs. Neurological checks and off-unit diagnostic testing were associated with the largest reductions in LUSO (approximately 40 min), followed by bed changes (−33.79 min).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the utility of LUSO and interruptive episodes as EHR-based measures to link PSIs to sleep opportunities. While vital signs and medications were the most frequent PSIs, neurological checks and off-unit testing were associated with the largest impact on reducing LUSO. The predominance of single-PSI interruptive episodes underscores that the bundling of PSIs is not occurring. These findings highlight that PSIs impact sleep opportunities in distinct ways, supporting the use of this methodology to evaluate and address EHR-linked disruptions to patient sleep.

利用电子健康记录评估医患互动对睡眠机会的影响。
背景:住院患者经常由于夜间医患互动(PSIs)而经历睡眠中断。本研究使用电子健康记录(EHR)数据评估psi如何影响神经内科住院患者的睡眠机会,并引入替代睡眠测量,如最长不间断睡眠机会(LUSO)和中断发作。目的:开发一种利用带时间戳的电子病历数据来量化和可视化psi对住院患者睡眠机会的影响的方法。方法:我们分析了某神经内科住院病房3305例患者的夜间数据,将psi分为6类:生命体征、神经学检查、给药、床边诊断测试、单元外诊断测试和床位更换。我们计算了LUSO和中断发作,并使用线性混合模型来评估psi和LUSO之间的关系。结果:92%的患者夜发生PSIs,平均每晚2.81次间断发作和4.06小时的LUSO。生命体征和药物管理是最常见的psi。神经学检查和非单元诊断测试与最大的LUSO减少(约40分钟)相关,其次是换床(-33.79分钟)。结论:本研究证明了LUSO和间断发作作为基于ehr的措施将PSIs与睡眠机会联系起来的效用。虽然生命体征和药物是最常见的psi,但神经学检查和非单元测试对减少LUSO的影响最大。单psi中断发作的优势强调了psi捆绑没有发生。这些发现强调psi以不同的方式影响睡眠机会,支持使用该方法来评估和解决与ehr相关的患者睡眠中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
Journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children. Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信