Image analysis-based identification of high risk ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers.

IF 7.4 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
Dong Neuck Lee, Yao Li, Linnea T Olsson, Alina M Hamilton, Benjamin C Calhoun, Katherine A Hoadley, J S Marron, Melissa A Troester
{"title":"Image analysis-based identification of high risk ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancers.","authors":"Dong Neuck Lee, Yao Li, Linnea T Olsson, Alina M Hamilton, Benjamin C Calhoun, Katherine A Hoadley, J S Marron, Melissa A Troester","doi":"10.1186/s13058-024-01915-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast cancer subtypes Luminal A and Luminal B are classified by the expression of PAM50 genes and may benefit from different treatment strategies. Machine learning models based on H&E images may contain features associated with subtype, allowing early identification of tumors with higher risk of recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>H&E images (n = 630 ER+/HER2-breast cancers) were pixel-level segmented into epithelium and stroma. Convolutional neural network and multiple instance learning were used to extract image features from original and segmented images. Patient-level classification models were trained to discriminate Luminal A versus B image features in tenfold cross-validation, with or without grade adjustment. The best-performing visual classifier was incorporated into envisioned diagnostic protocols as an alternative to genomic testing (PAM50). The protocols were then compared in time-to-recurrence models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among ER+/HER2-tumors, the image-based protocol differentiated recurrence times with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.81 (95% CI: 1.73-4.56), which was similar to the HR for PAM50 (2.66, 95% CI: 1.65-4.28). Grade adjustment did not improve subtype prediction accuracy, but did help balance sensitivity and specificity. Among high grade participants, sensitivity and specificity (0.734 and 0.474, respectively) became more similar (0.732 and 0.624, respectively) in grade-adjusted models. The original and epithelium-specific images had similar performance and highest accuracy, followed by stroma or binarized images showing only the epithelial-stromal interface.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given low rates of genomic testing uptake nationally, image-based methods may help identify ER+/HER2-patients who could benefit from testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":49227,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research","volume":"26 1","pages":"177"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11616316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-024-01915-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast cancer subtypes Luminal A and Luminal B are classified by the expression of PAM50 genes and may benefit from different treatment strategies. Machine learning models based on H&E images may contain features associated with subtype, allowing early identification of tumors with higher risk of recurrence.

Methods: H&E images (n = 630 ER+/HER2-breast cancers) were pixel-level segmented into epithelium and stroma. Convolutional neural network and multiple instance learning were used to extract image features from original and segmented images. Patient-level classification models were trained to discriminate Luminal A versus B image features in tenfold cross-validation, with or without grade adjustment. The best-performing visual classifier was incorporated into envisioned diagnostic protocols as an alternative to genomic testing (PAM50). The protocols were then compared in time-to-recurrence models.

Results: Among ER+/HER2-tumors, the image-based protocol differentiated recurrence times with a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.81 (95% CI: 1.73-4.56), which was similar to the HR for PAM50 (2.66, 95% CI: 1.65-4.28). Grade adjustment did not improve subtype prediction accuracy, but did help balance sensitivity and specificity. Among high grade participants, sensitivity and specificity (0.734 and 0.474, respectively) became more similar (0.732 and 0.624, respectively) in grade-adjusted models. The original and epithelium-specific images had similar performance and highest accuracy, followed by stroma or binarized images showing only the epithelial-stromal interface.

Conclusions: Given low rates of genomic testing uptake nationally, image-based methods may help identify ER+/HER2-patients who could benefit from testing.

基于图像分析的高风险er阳性和her2阴性乳腺癌的识别。
背景:乳腺癌亚型Luminal A和Luminal B根据PAM50基因的表达进行分类,可能受益于不同的治疗策略。基于H&E图像的机器学习模型可能包含与亚型相关的特征,允许早期识别复发风险较高的肿瘤。方法:630例ER+/ her2型乳腺癌的H&E图像按像素水平分割为上皮和间质。利用卷积神经网络和多实例学习技术从原始图像和分割图像中提取图像特征。训练患者级别的分类模型,在十倍交叉验证中区分Luminal A和B图像特征,有或没有等级调整。表现最好的视觉分类器被纳入预期的诊断方案,作为基因组检测(PAM50)的替代方案。然后在复发时间模型中比较这些方案。结果:在ER+/ her2肿瘤中,基于图像的方案区分复发时间的风险比(HR)为2.81 (95% CI: 1.73-4.56),与PAM50的风险比(HR)相似(2.66,95% CI: 1.65-4.28)。等级调整不能提高亚型预测的准确性,但有助于平衡敏感性和特异性。在高等级的参与者中,在等级调整模型中,敏感性和特异性(分别为0.734和0.474)变得更加相似(分别为0.732和0.624)。原始图像和上皮特异性图像具有相似的性能和最高的准确性,其次是基质图像或二值化图像,仅显示上皮-基质界面。结论:鉴于全国基因组检测使用率较低,基于图像的方法可能有助于识别ER+/ her2患者,这些患者可能从检测中受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research, an international, peer-reviewed online journal, publishes original research, reviews, editorials, and reports. It features open-access research articles of exceptional interest across all areas of biology and medicine relevant to breast cancer. This includes normal mammary gland biology, with a special emphasis on the genetic, biochemical, and cellular basis of breast cancer. In addition to basic research, the journal covers preclinical, translational, and clinical studies with a biological basis, including Phase I and Phase II trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信