Palliative care in policy documents for adults with cancer and non-cancer diseases with potential palliative care needs: a document analysis.

IF 2.7 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Care and Social Practice Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26323524241296145
Anna O'Sullivan, Linnéa Carling, Joakim Öhlén, Stina Nyblom, Anneli Ozanne, Ragnhild Hedman, Carl-Johan Fürst, Cecilia Larsdotter
{"title":"Palliative care in policy documents for adults with cancer and non-cancer diseases with potential palliative care needs: a document analysis.","authors":"Anna O'Sullivan, Linnéa Carling, Joakim Öhlén, Stina Nyblom, Anneli Ozanne, Ragnhild Hedman, Carl-Johan Fürst, Cecilia Larsdotter","doi":"10.1177/26323524241296145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The inclusion of palliative care in policy has been encouraged internationally, and gradually implemented, including in Sweden. Care should be driven by policy; hence, examining how palliative care is included in national policy documents is paramount.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to examine how palliative care is included in national disease-specific policy documents for adults with chronic conditions, cancer and non-cancer, with potential palliative care needs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Document analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A document analysis of Swedish policy documents for different disease-specific groups with severe chronic conditions, cancer and non-cancer, was performed. In total, 96 documents were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>How palliative care was included in the policy documents varied from mentioning the term without explanation to detailed discussion regarding palliative care practice. Such discussion encompassed several conceptualisations of palliative care: defined through authorities' definitions; as care of dying persons; integrated with disease-specific care and treatment; limited to disease-specific medical treatments or based on detail regarding certain key elements of palliative care such as specialised palliative care and end-of-life conversations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There may be large variations in how palliative care is conceptualised in national disease-specific policy documents, as disclosed by this analysis of the Swedish case. Limiting palliative care to disease-specific medical treatments (most commonly palliative oncological treatments) or the care of dying persons limits its scope in ways contrary to current evidence supporting early integrated palliative care. The lack of palliative care recommendations adapted for each specific diagnosis indicates a gap in policy. To promote equal access to palliative care regardless of patients' diseases or medical conditions, the importance of how palliative care is included in national policy documents needs to be further acknowledged and discussed - with palliative care consistently included in such documents.</p>","PeriodicalId":36693,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","volume":"18 ","pages":"26323524241296145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11615978/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Care and Social Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524241296145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The inclusion of palliative care in policy has been encouraged internationally, and gradually implemented, including in Sweden. Care should be driven by policy; hence, examining how palliative care is included in national policy documents is paramount.

Objectives: This study aimed to examine how palliative care is included in national disease-specific policy documents for adults with chronic conditions, cancer and non-cancer, with potential palliative care needs.

Design: Document analysis.

Methods: A document analysis of Swedish policy documents for different disease-specific groups with severe chronic conditions, cancer and non-cancer, was performed. In total, 96 documents were analysed.

Results: How palliative care was included in the policy documents varied from mentioning the term without explanation to detailed discussion regarding palliative care practice. Such discussion encompassed several conceptualisations of palliative care: defined through authorities' definitions; as care of dying persons; integrated with disease-specific care and treatment; limited to disease-specific medical treatments or based on detail regarding certain key elements of palliative care such as specialised palliative care and end-of-life conversations.

Conclusion: There may be large variations in how palliative care is conceptualised in national disease-specific policy documents, as disclosed by this analysis of the Swedish case. Limiting palliative care to disease-specific medical treatments (most commonly palliative oncological treatments) or the care of dying persons limits its scope in ways contrary to current evidence supporting early integrated palliative care. The lack of palliative care recommendations adapted for each specific diagnosis indicates a gap in policy. To promote equal access to palliative care regardless of patients' diseases or medical conditions, the importance of how palliative care is included in national policy documents needs to be further acknowledged and discussed - with palliative care consistently included in such documents.

有潜在姑息治疗需求的成人癌症和非癌症疾病政策文件中的姑息治疗:一项文件分析。
背景:国际上鼓励将姑息治疗纳入政策,并逐步实施,包括在瑞典。护理应由政策驱动;因此,研究如何将姑息治疗纳入国家政策文件至关重要。目的:本研究旨在探讨如何将姑息治疗纳入具有潜在姑息治疗需求的成人慢性病、癌症和非癌症患者的国家疾病特定政策文件。设计:文档分析。方法:对瑞典针对不同疾病特异性人群(癌症和非癌症)的政策文件进行文献分析。总共分析了96份文件。结果:姑息治疗纳入政策文件的方式各不相同,从提及姑息治疗一词而不作解释到对姑息治疗实践进行详细讨论。这样的讨论包含了姑息治疗的几个概念:通过当局的定义来定义;照顾垂死的人;结合特定疾病的护理和治疗;仅限于特定疾病的医学治疗或基于姑息治疗的某些关键要素的细节,如专门的姑息治疗和临终对话。结论:正如对瑞典病例的分析所揭示的那样,在国家疾病特定政策文件中如何概念化姑息治疗可能存在很大差异。将姑息治疗局限于特定疾病的医学治疗(最常见的是姑息性肿瘤治疗)或临终者的护理,限制了其范围,与目前支持早期综合姑息治疗的证据相反。缺乏针对每种具体诊断的姑息治疗建议表明政策存在差距。为了促进平等获得姑息治疗,无论患者的疾病或医疗状况如何,需要进一步承认和讨论如何将姑息治疗纳入国家政策文件的重要性,并始终将姑息治疗纳入此类文件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative Care and Social Practice
Palliative Care and Social Practice Nursing-Advanced and Specialized Nursing
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信