Revitalizing faith: an inquiry into political Sufism and religious continuity in contemporary Kazakhstan.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-11-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1447966
Nodar Karimov, Risalat-Bibi Karimova, Khalminyam Massimova, Gulzhakhan Khajiyeva
{"title":"Revitalizing faith: an inquiry into political Sufism and religious continuity in contemporary Kazakhstan.","authors":"Nodar Karimov, Risalat-Bibi Karimova, Khalminyam Massimova, Gulzhakhan Khajiyeva","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1447966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The article embarks upon a study of political Sufism in contemporary Kazakhstan and patterns of religious continuity through an examination of Islamic manifestations that stretch back centuries, juxtaposed with the current state religious policy. It examines the role of the Muftiate's \"official Islam\" in shaping the life of religious communities, exploring the intricate interplay between religious identity, secularism, and public perception in the post-Soviet landscape. The author employed a multi-faceted research approach, integrating historical analysis, policy examination, and an ethnographic study of contemporary religious dynamics in the country. The historical analysis provides a foundation of the religious landscape, while policy analysis examines the state's contemporary role in shaping religious practices. Ethnography, focusing on groups such as the Jahriyya, Naqshbandiyya, and the Suhba, involves respondents from diverse regions of Kazakhstan, offering firsthand insights into the experiences and perceptions of Sufi communities at the grassroots level, which enriches the study with a contextual perspective. Notably, fieldwork surveys, where the author engaged with respondents, provide valuable insights into the diverse experiences shaping the dynamics of political Sufism and religious continuity. They involved a diverse group of respondents, including religious leaders, community members, and secular intellectuals, from multiple regions of Kazakhstan at both urban and rural levels. The article is of scientific and practical significance as it enhances understanding of religious dynamics in the country, offering policymakers, scholars, and practitioners valuable perspectives for informed decision-making and policy development. The research's limitations include its focus on specific Sufi groups within Kazakhstan, which may not represent the full spectrum of Islamic practices across the region. The recommendations emphasize the need for further analysis of how prioritizing doctrinal adherence over individual freedoms contributes to the erosion of authentic religious institutions and the politicization of Islam. It also recommends to investigate the roles of Sufi groups in filling spiritual and social vacuums, their potential for politicization, and how this interplay affects religious freedom and national identity in Kazakhstan. This is particularly significant given the state's efforts to appropriate Islamic traditions for ideological purposes, which has led to a separation between Islamic doctrine and its lived expressions. Finally, it emphasizes the need for further comparative research on Sufi movements across Central Asia to better understand how different state policies impact religious communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1447966"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11615719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1447966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article embarks upon a study of political Sufism in contemporary Kazakhstan and patterns of religious continuity through an examination of Islamic manifestations that stretch back centuries, juxtaposed with the current state religious policy. It examines the role of the Muftiate's "official Islam" in shaping the life of religious communities, exploring the intricate interplay between religious identity, secularism, and public perception in the post-Soviet landscape. The author employed a multi-faceted research approach, integrating historical analysis, policy examination, and an ethnographic study of contemporary religious dynamics in the country. The historical analysis provides a foundation of the religious landscape, while policy analysis examines the state's contemporary role in shaping religious practices. Ethnography, focusing on groups such as the Jahriyya, Naqshbandiyya, and the Suhba, involves respondents from diverse regions of Kazakhstan, offering firsthand insights into the experiences and perceptions of Sufi communities at the grassroots level, which enriches the study with a contextual perspective. Notably, fieldwork surveys, where the author engaged with respondents, provide valuable insights into the diverse experiences shaping the dynamics of political Sufism and religious continuity. They involved a diverse group of respondents, including religious leaders, community members, and secular intellectuals, from multiple regions of Kazakhstan at both urban and rural levels. The article is of scientific and practical significance as it enhances understanding of religious dynamics in the country, offering policymakers, scholars, and practitioners valuable perspectives for informed decision-making and policy development. The research's limitations include its focus on specific Sufi groups within Kazakhstan, which may not represent the full spectrum of Islamic practices across the region. The recommendations emphasize the need for further analysis of how prioritizing doctrinal adherence over individual freedoms contributes to the erosion of authentic religious institutions and the politicization of Islam. It also recommends to investigate the roles of Sufi groups in filling spiritual and social vacuums, their potential for politicization, and how this interplay affects religious freedom and national identity in Kazakhstan. This is particularly significant given the state's efforts to appropriate Islamic traditions for ideological purposes, which has led to a separation between Islamic doctrine and its lived expressions. Finally, it emphasizes the need for further comparative research on Sufi movements across Central Asia to better understand how different state policies impact religious communities.

复兴信仰:对当代哈萨克斯坦政治苏非主义和宗教连续性的探究。
本文开始研究当代哈萨克斯坦的政治苏非主义,并通过对几个世纪前伊斯兰教表现形式的考察,并与当前的国家宗教政策并列,研究宗教连续性的模式。它考察了穆夫提特的“官方伊斯兰教”在塑造宗教社区生活中的作用,探索了后苏联时期宗教认同、世俗主义和公众认知之间错综复杂的相互作用。作者采用了多方面的研究方法,将历史分析、政策考察和当代宗教动态的民族志研究结合起来。历史分析为宗教景观提供了基础,而政策分析则考察了国家在塑造宗教习俗方面的当代作用。民族志的重点是Jahriyya、Naqshbandiyya和Suhba等群体,涉及来自哈萨克斯坦不同地区的受访者,提供了对基层苏菲派社区经验和看法的第一手见解,从而丰富了背景视角的研究。值得注意的是,作者与受访者进行的实地调查,为塑造政治苏非主义和宗教连续性动态的不同经历提供了宝贵的见解。调查涉及来自哈萨克斯坦城市和农村多个地区的不同群体的答复者,包括宗教领袖、社区成员和世俗知识分子。这篇文章具有科学和现实意义,因为它增强了对该国宗教动态的理解,为决策者、学者和实践者提供了有价值的观点,有助于知情决策和政策制定。这项研究的局限性包括它关注的是哈萨克斯坦境内特定的苏菲派团体,这可能不能代表整个地区伊斯兰教实践的全部范围。这些建议强调有必要进一步分析,将坚持教义置于个人自由之上是如何导致真正的宗教机构受到侵蚀和伊斯兰教政治化的。它还建议调查苏菲派团体在填补精神和社会真空方面的作用,他们政治化的可能性,以及这种相互作用如何影响哈萨克斯坦的宗教自由和民族认同。这一点尤其重要,因为该国努力将伊斯兰传统用于意识形态目的,这导致了伊斯兰教义与其生活表达之间的分离。最后,它强调需要进一步对中亚苏菲派运动进行比较研究,以更好地了解不同的国家政策如何影响宗教社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信