Scoping review meets expert interviews: Key issues of multimodal programs for workplace health promotion in long-term care facilities - "We can't just run a standard program".

IF 2.4 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Health Promotion Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-10-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.34172/hpp.42899
Judith Czakert, Anne Schirmaier, Sarah B Blakeslee, Wiebke Stritter, Anna K Koch, Christian Kessler, Georg Seifert
{"title":"Scoping review meets expert interviews: Key issues of multimodal programs for workplace health promotion in long-term care facilities - <i>\"We can't just run a standard program\"</i>.","authors":"Judith Czakert, Anne Schirmaier, Sarah B Blakeslee, Wiebke Stritter, Anna K Koch, Christian Kessler, Georg Seifert","doi":"10.34172/hpp.42899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Long-term care facility employees' workload escalation intensifies negative risk for (nursing) staff health, residents, and the economy. Workplace health promotion (WHP) has emerged as a vital approach with positive impacts on employee well-being. This Scoping Review focuses on multimodal WHP programs in long-term care facilities, emphasizing barriers, facilitators, and the integration of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search strategy from February to April 2023 in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) yielded 506 hits. Findings were enriched through semi-structured expert interviews. All data were analyzed with a deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven publications met inclusion criteria and eight experts were interviewed based on key topics of the included publications. The integration of the results showed that primary obstacles highlight structural challenges (time, finances, hierarchies) and team dynamics (lack of support, communication issues, low motivation), while effective communication, support from the management, and participatory engagement enhance program success. CIM approaches are not explicitly referenced as such, despite widespread use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An exclusive CIM-focus, with multimodal WHP programs for long-term care facilities is missing and should highlight the necessity of a multimethod approach intervention. While the need for further research about the specific topic of multimodal, CIM-based WHO programs in long-term care facilities - including cross-cultural and international comparisons - is apparent, an appropriate evaluation of complex interventions is challenging given the nature of multimodal WHP programs. A multi-method approach is therefore recommended as standard for further research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":46588,"journal":{"name":"Health Promotion Perspectives","volume":"14 3","pages":"221-237"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11612354/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Promotion Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.42899","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Long-term care facility employees' workload escalation intensifies negative risk for (nursing) staff health, residents, and the economy. Workplace health promotion (WHP) has emerged as a vital approach with positive impacts on employee well-being. This Scoping Review focuses on multimodal WHP programs in long-term care facilities, emphasizing barriers, facilitators, and the integration of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM).

Methods: Following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search strategy from February to April 2023 in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid), and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) yielded 506 hits. Findings were enriched through semi-structured expert interviews. All data were analyzed with a deductive-inductive qualitative content analysis.

Results: Eleven publications met inclusion criteria and eight experts were interviewed based on key topics of the included publications. The integration of the results showed that primary obstacles highlight structural challenges (time, finances, hierarchies) and team dynamics (lack of support, communication issues, low motivation), while effective communication, support from the management, and participatory engagement enhance program success. CIM approaches are not explicitly referenced as such, despite widespread use.

Conclusion: An exclusive CIM-focus, with multimodal WHP programs for long-term care facilities is missing and should highlight the necessity of a multimethod approach intervention. While the need for further research about the specific topic of multimodal, CIM-based WHO programs in long-term care facilities - including cross-cultural and international comparisons - is apparent, an appropriate evaluation of complex interventions is challenging given the nature of multimodal WHP programs. A multi-method approach is therefore recommended as standard for further research in this area.

范围审查与专家访谈:长期护理机构工作场所健康促进多模式方案的关键问题——“我们不能只运行一个标准方案”。
背景:长期护理机构员工工作量的增加加剧了(护理)员工健康、居民和经济的负面风险。工作场所健康促进(WHP)已成为对员工福祉产生积极影响的重要方法。本范围审查侧重于长期护理机构的多模式WHP计划,强调障碍、促进因素以及补充和综合医学(CIM)的整合。方法:遵循PRISMA-ScR指南,从2023年2月至4月在Medline (PubMed), EMBASE (Ovid)和CINAHL (EBSCOhost)中进行系统搜索策略,获得506个点击。通过半结构化的专家访谈丰富了调查结果。所有数据均采用演绎-归纳定性含量分析进行分析。结果:11篇文献符合入选标准,并根据入选文献的关键主题对8位专家进行了访谈。综合结果显示,主要障碍突出了结构性挑战(时间、资金、层级)和团队动力(缺乏支持、沟通问题、低动机),而有效的沟通、管理层的支持和参与性参与促进了项目的成功。尽管CIM方法被广泛使用,但并未明确引用。结论:缺乏针对长期护理设施的多模式WHP计划的专门关注,应该强调多方法干预的必要性。虽然显然需要进一步研究世卫组织在长期护理设施中多模式、基于免疫系统的规划的具体主题,包括跨文化和国际比较,但考虑到多模式卫生项目规划的性质,对复杂干预措施进行适当评估是具有挑战性的。因此,建议采用多方法方法作为这一领域进一步研究的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Promotion Perspectives
Health Promotion Perspectives PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信