Outcomes for older patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage who require admission to an Australian intensive care unit.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jeremy Sharman, Natasha Turner, Amalia Karahalios, Ben Sansom, Adam M Deane, Mark P Plummer
{"title":"Outcomes for older patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage who require admission to an Australian intensive care unit.","authors":"Jeremy Sharman, Natasha Turner, Amalia Karahalios, Ben Sansom, Adam M Deane, Mark P Plummer","doi":"10.1177/17511437241301916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced age is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, Australian data are lacking. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes for older patients admitted to an Australian intensive care unit for management of aneurysmal SAH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single centre retrospective observational study looking at adult patients admitted with aneurysmal SAH to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) over a 10-year period. Patients were grouped by age; <70 years, 70-79 years, ⩾80 years, and were of sufficient complexity to be unsuitable for our neurosurgical high-dependency unit. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital length of stay, and discharge destination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 372 patients admitted to ICU with aneurysmal SAH, 302 (82%) were younger (<70 years), 46 (12%) were septuagenarians and 24 (6%) were octogenarians. There were no differences between clinical or radiological grade of aneurysmal SAH between age cohorts. When compared to the patients younger than 70 years, there was increased odds of dying for those 70-79 and ⩾80 years (70-79: OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.93, 4.20 <i>p</i> = 0.077; ⩾80: OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.55, 10.35 <i>p</i> = 0.004). There were no associations between age and duration of admission. Only 6% of patients aged ⩾70 years were discharged home alive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It was uncommon for patients over 70 years of age who present with a SAH to be discharged home from hospital, and those aged ⩾80 are four times more likely to die in hospital than younger patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":" ","pages":"17511437241301916"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11613149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437241301916","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced age is an independent risk factor for poor outcomes following aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, Australian data are lacking. Our aim was to evaluate outcomes for older patients admitted to an Australian intensive care unit for management of aneurysmal SAH.

Methods: We conducted a single centre retrospective observational study looking at adult patients admitted with aneurysmal SAH to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU) over a 10-year period. Patients were grouped by age; <70 years, 70-79 years, ⩾80 years, and were of sufficient complexity to be unsuitable for our neurosurgical high-dependency unit. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were ICU and hospital length of stay, and discharge destination.

Results: Of 372 patients admitted to ICU with aneurysmal SAH, 302 (82%) were younger (<70 years), 46 (12%) were septuagenarians and 24 (6%) were octogenarians. There were no differences between clinical or radiological grade of aneurysmal SAH between age cohorts. When compared to the patients younger than 70 years, there was increased odds of dying for those 70-79 and ⩾80 years (70-79: OR 1.98, 95% CI 0.93, 4.20 p = 0.077; ⩾80: OR 4.01, 95% CI 1.55, 10.35 p = 0.004). There were no associations between age and duration of admission. Only 6% of patients aged ⩾70 years were discharged home alive.

Conclusion: It was uncommon for patients over 70 years of age who present with a SAH to be discharged home from hospital, and those aged ⩾80 are four times more likely to die in hospital than younger patients.

高龄蛛网膜下腔出血患者需要入住澳大利亚重症监护病房的结局。
背景:高龄是动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血(SAH)后预后不良的独立危险因素。然而,澳大利亚缺乏相关数据。我们的目的是评估在澳大利亚重症监护病房治疗动脉瘤性SAH的老年患者的结果。方法:我们进行了一项单中心回顾性观察性研究,观察了10年间入住重症监护病房(ICU)的动脉瘤性SAH成年患者。患者按年龄分组;结果:372例入住ICU的动脉瘤性SAH患者中,302例(82%)为年轻患者(p = 0.077;⩾80:10.35或4.01,95% CI 1.55, p = 0.004)。年龄和入院时间之间没有关联。只有6%的年龄大于或等于70岁的患者活着出院回家。结论:对于70岁以上的SAH患者来说,从医院出院的情况并不常见,而那些年龄大于或等于80岁的患者在医院死亡的可能性是年轻患者的四倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信