Point-of-care testing improves care timeliness in the emergency department. A multicenter randomized clinical trial (study POCTUR).

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Antonio Leon-Justel, Carmen Navarro Bustos, Jose Angel Noval-Padillo, Salomon Martin Perez, Maria Dolores Aviles Gomez, Nelia Jimenez Valencia, Jose M Garrido Castilla, Miguel Diaz Muñoz, Maria A Rivera Vizcaino, Laura Alvarez Heredia, Emilia Gracia Moreno, Maria Esther Roldan Fontan, Caludio Bueno Mariscal, Juan Miguel Guerrero Montavez, Catalina Sanchez-Mora
{"title":"Point-of-care testing improves care timeliness in the emergency department. A multicenter randomized clinical trial (study POCTUR).","authors":"Antonio Leon-Justel, Carmen Navarro Bustos, Jose Angel Noval-Padillo, Salomon Martin Perez, Maria Dolores Aviles Gomez, Nelia Jimenez Valencia, Jose M Garrido Castilla, Miguel Diaz Muñoz, Maria A Rivera Vizcaino, Laura Alvarez Heredia, Emilia Gracia Moreno, Maria Esther Roldan Fontan, Caludio Bueno Mariscal, Juan Miguel Guerrero Montavez, Catalina Sanchez-Mora","doi":"10.1515/cclm-2024-1040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency department (ED) crowding is a widespread problem that positions patients at risk. The desire to improve the ED throughput requires novel approaches. Point-of-care testing (POCT) has emerged as useful technology that could contribute to create more efficient patient flow and better timeliness in the ED. The main objective of our study is to demonstrate, in a multicenter study, that POCT benefits care timeliness in the ED.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter and cluster randomized study. A total of 3,200 patients. We randomly assigned patients to a POCT group or Central Laboratory Group. The primary outcome was the ED time to clinical decision. The secondary outcome included the length of stay and the laboratory turnaround time. Readmission within the seven after discharge was also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary finding of this study is a strategy based on POCT that aims to significantly improve care timeliness in the ED. We found significant reductions in all outcomes regardless of presentation reason, patient disposition or hospital type. Time to clinical decision decreased by 75.2 min (205-129.8), length of stay by 77.5 min (273.1-195.6) and laboratory turnaround time by 56.2 min (82.2-26) in the POCT group. No increase in readmission was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our strategy represents a good approach to optimize timeliness in the ED. It should be seen as a starting point for further operational research focusing on POCT for improving throughput and reducing crowding in the ED.</p>","PeriodicalId":10390,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2024-1040","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Emergency department (ED) crowding is a widespread problem that positions patients at risk. The desire to improve the ED throughput requires novel approaches. Point-of-care testing (POCT) has emerged as useful technology that could contribute to create more efficient patient flow and better timeliness in the ED. The main objective of our study is to demonstrate, in a multicenter study, that POCT benefits care timeliness in the ED.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter and cluster randomized study. A total of 3,200 patients. We randomly assigned patients to a POCT group or Central Laboratory Group. The primary outcome was the ED time to clinical decision. The secondary outcome included the length of stay and the laboratory turnaround time. Readmission within the seven after discharge was also calculated.

Results: The primary finding of this study is a strategy based on POCT that aims to significantly improve care timeliness in the ED. We found significant reductions in all outcomes regardless of presentation reason, patient disposition or hospital type. Time to clinical decision decreased by 75.2 min (205-129.8), length of stay by 77.5 min (273.1-195.6) and laboratory turnaround time by 56.2 min (82.2-26) in the POCT group. No increase in readmission was found.

Conclusions: Our strategy represents a good approach to optimize timeliness in the ED. It should be seen as a starting point for further operational research focusing on POCT for improving throughput and reducing crowding in the ED.

即时检测提高了急诊科护理的及时性。多中心随机临床试验(POCTUR研究)。
目的:急诊科(ED)拥挤是一个普遍存在的问题,使患者处于危险之中。提高ED吞吐量的愿望需要新颖的方法。即时护理测试(POCT)已经成为一项有用的技术,有助于在急诊科创造更有效的病人流和更好的及时性。我们研究的主要目的是在一项多中心研究中证明POCT有利于急诊科的护理及时性。共有3200名患者。我们将患者随机分配到POCT组或中心实验室组。主要观察指标为急诊科到临床决定的时间。次要结果包括住院时间和实验室周转时间。同时计算出院后7天内的再入院率。结果:本研究的主要发现是一种基于POCT的策略,旨在显著提高急诊科的护理及时性。我们发现,无论出现原因、患者倾向或医院类型如何,所有结果都显著降低。POCT组临床决策时间缩短75.2 min(205-129.8),住院时间缩短77.5 min(273.1-195.6),实验室周转时间缩短56.2 min(82.2-26)。未发现再入院人数增加。结论:我们的策略是优化急诊科及时性的一个很好的方法。它应该被视为进一步的运营研究的起点,重点放在POCT上,以提高急诊科的吞吐量和减少拥挤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine
Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
16.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM) publishes articles on novel teaching and training methods applicable to laboratory medicine. CCLM welcomes contributions on the progress in fundamental and applied research and cutting-edge clinical laboratory medicine. It is one of the leading journals in the field, with an impact factor over 3. CCLM is issued monthly, and it is published in print and electronically. CCLM is the official journal of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM) and publishes regularly EFLM recommendations and news. CCLM is the official journal of the National Societies from Austria (ÖGLMKC); Belgium (RBSLM); Germany (DGKL); Hungary (MLDT); Ireland (ACBI); Italy (SIBioC); Portugal (SPML); and Slovenia (SZKK); and it is affiliated to AACB (Australia) and SFBC (France). Topics: - clinical biochemistry - clinical genomics and molecular biology - clinical haematology and coagulation - clinical immunology and autoimmunity - clinical microbiology - drug monitoring and analysis - evaluation of diagnostic biomarkers - disease-oriented topics (cardiovascular disease, cancer diagnostics, diabetes) - new reagents, instrumentation and technologies - new methodologies - reference materials and methods - reference values and decision limits - quality and safety in laboratory medicine - translational laboratory medicine - clinical metrology Follow @cclm_degruyter on Twitter!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信