Effectiveness of palliative hemostatic radiotherapy for hemoptysis: a prospective single-arm observation study.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Saif Aljabab, Ionut Busca, Yasir Alayed, Kristopher Dennis, Robert MacRae
{"title":"Effectiveness of palliative hemostatic radiotherapy for hemoptysis: a prospective single-arm observation study.","authors":"Saif Aljabab, Ionut Busca, Yasir Alayed, Kristopher Dennis, Robert MacRae","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used for malignancy-associated hemoptysis. This study aims to determine RT control probability, durability, and influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-institution prospective observational study included patients ≥18 years old with any lung malignancy and active hemoptysis. Hemoptysis severity was captured and monitored via Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and an in-house developed Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) tool. Patients were interviewed at enrollment, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment. Descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Cox regression models were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From April 2016 to November 2018, 41 patients were enrolled. One patient withdrew consent and was excluded. The median age was 68 years. Most patients were male (67%) with stage 4 (87.5%), lung primary (85%) disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2 (55%). The most common fractionation scheme (72.5%) was 2,000 cGy in 5 fractions. Eight patients (20%) passed away before 2-week assessment. Median follow-up was 6.1 months (range, 0.9-6.2 months). The 6-month overall survival (OS) rate was 26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 13-41%]. The 6-month bleeding-related survival (BRS) was 95% (95% CI: 80-99%), and the 6-month freedom from hemoptysis rate was 37% (95% CI: 18-57%). No patient received re-irradiation for their hemoptysis. On univariate analysis, ECOG status (P=0.01) and prior radiation (P=0.006) were strongly associated with freedom from hemoptysis survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Hemostatic RT remains an effective modality for controlling hemoptysis. The short interval high mortality rate post-RT challenges whether fractionated palliative RT should be used for this patient population. Conducting a large clinical trial with a hemoptysis PROM tool is necessary to identify hemostatic durability and influencing factors properly.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":"13 6","pages":"1343-1352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-45","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative radiotherapy (RT) is commonly used for malignancy-associated hemoptysis. This study aims to determine RT control probability, durability, and influencing factors.

Methods: This single-institution prospective observational study included patients ≥18 years old with any lung malignancy and active hemoptysis. Hemoptysis severity was captured and monitored via Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and an in-house developed Patient-Reported Outcome Measure (PROM) tool. Patients were interviewed at enrollment, 2 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months post-treatment. Descriptive statistics, the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method, the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Cox regression models were used.

Results: From April 2016 to November 2018, 41 patients were enrolled. One patient withdrew consent and was excluded. The median age was 68 years. Most patients were male (67%) with stage 4 (87.5%), lung primary (85%) disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥2 (55%). The most common fractionation scheme (72.5%) was 2,000 cGy in 5 fractions. Eight patients (20%) passed away before 2-week assessment. Median follow-up was 6.1 months (range, 0.9-6.2 months). The 6-month overall survival (OS) rate was 26% [95% confidence interval (CI): 13-41%]. The 6-month bleeding-related survival (BRS) was 95% (95% CI: 80-99%), and the 6-month freedom from hemoptysis rate was 37% (95% CI: 18-57%). No patient received re-irradiation for their hemoptysis. On univariate analysis, ECOG status (P=0.01) and prior radiation (P=0.006) were strongly associated with freedom from hemoptysis survival.

Conclusions: Hemostatic RT remains an effective modality for controlling hemoptysis. The short interval high mortality rate post-RT challenges whether fractionated palliative RT should be used for this patient population. Conducting a large clinical trial with a hemoptysis PROM tool is necessary to identify hemostatic durability and influencing factors properly.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信